Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (
More info?)
Ok, now I see.
Make sure that the settings under Computer configuration|Administrative
Templates|System|Group Policy are not set to apply GPOs even if nothing
changes. They would be the * policy processing policies in the list.
--
Derek Melber
BrainCore.Net
derekm@braincore.net
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:b7dd01c4378f$41151c10$a001280a@phx.gbl...
> Derek,
>
> It's true, it's good thing, the policy is succefully
> applying, but every 7 minutes??? this makes the apps and
> services that I'm running in the server to work very slow
> in the cycle of the 7 minutes.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >I thought you were getting an error every 7 minutes? The
> message you just
> >typed indicated the GPO applied successfully?
> >
> >What am I missing?
> >
> >--
> >Derek Melber
> >BrainCore.Net
> >derekm@braincore.net
> ><anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >news:b74b01c43783$cdd183c0$a001280a@phx.gbl...
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Thanks Derek, There are no Error codes in the event,
> >> just this event that says This:
> >>
> >> "Security policy in the Group policy objects are applied
> >> successfully."
> >>
> >> this adds too much load to the server and the other
> >> services suffers for this behavior. how I can change
> this??
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >what is the error associated with the number?
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Derek Melber
> >> >BrainCore.Net
> >> >derekm@braincore.net
> >> >"Angelo" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> >> message
> >> >news:ab8c01c436b1$c6310870$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm Having Problems with a DC here. I'm Getting the
> >> SceCli
> >> >> 1704 event exacly every 7 minutes, and I don't know
> wich
> >> >> could be the problem. it's clear that the server is
> >> >> unnecesary applying group policy every 7 minutes wich
> >> also
> >> >> causes that the server at those times to be extremely
> >> >> slow. I don't know where to check, can anyone know
> about
> >> >> this issue??
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >.
> >> >
> >
> >
> >.
> >