I think PCIe 2.0 is already on its way (meaning we will see it sometime mid or end of this year) i somewhat doubt that there will be any performance cards for AGP. Maybe some mid range cards though.
the outlook also didn't look too bright for the future of AGP back on the move to PCI-E, yet you still see top end cards ported to AGP...
I think there will be DX10 AGP cards, however they will be few and far between, and nowhere near as fast as their PCI-E counterparts. I predict it will also be some time before you see them, probably around 6 months after the release of its PCI-E counterpart. Take for example the X1950. after being out for some time, they finally released its AGP cousin, however diluted.
HOWEVER, I do not believe it is cool if they do. the longer legacy devices are kept around, the slower it is for better technologies to progress and the more things are bloated down to support dying tech. how much more effort does it take to make a PCI-PCI-E bridge and plug something into a 1x slot?
In all due respect, PCI should have died last year. Serial and Parallel should have died in the home (still needed for some schools, fabrication and industrial applications) 5 years ago, and IDE should be on its last legs. AGP also has no right to continue in my opinion as there is next to no support for it anymore. aside from ASRock, there is no more support for AGP mobo's left in the enthusiast market. better performance can be had going with a cheap mobo and proc upgrade than continuing to extend the life of a dead standard. If DX10 is something that is appealing to you, save yer $$ and get an upgrade worthwhile.
the outlook also didn't look too bright for the future of AGP back on the move to PCI-E, yet you still see top end cards ported to AGP...
I think there will be DX10 AGP cards, however they will be few and far between, and nowhere near as fast as their PCI-E counterparts. I predict it will also be some time before you see them, probably around 6 months after the release of its PCI-E counterpart. Take for example the X1950. after being out for some time, they finally released its AGP cousin, however diluted.
That's not a very pretty picture so like I said, the outlook does not look bright.
And georgelawton's right. The AGP version of the X1950Pro isn't a diluted version of it's PCI-E cousin. Ditto for the 7600GT and it's AGP variant.
I would say no, but I'd hate to repeat history. The 6800 was "definitely (according to some) the end", then we got the 7800. That was an overpriced last flail at a dying market, until we got the 7600GT, and more recently the X1950.
Will you ever get an 8800GTX on AGP? No, probably not. Will you, sometime in the future, get an 8300GS(or equivalent)? Quite possible, in my opinion.
I doubt many manufacturers will bother. Dx10 requires having Vista which costs as much as $200(legally ) just for premium, depending if you buy retail or oem.
For the most part, any gamers who aren't willing or financially able to upgrade from an old agp mobo+ card also probably aren't going to be willing to spend the cash to upgrade to vista either, so there isn't going to be a huge demand in the marketplace.
With PCIe 2.0 coming out in the very near future, I think Agp is in it's final days. Even if someone decides to come out with an agp dx 10 card, it will most likely be done as an afterthought, and will end up being a low- end watered down version of whats available on pcie 2.0.
I would say the only light is dim and not worth considering.
I expect low end DX10 cards for the proffesional workstation market.
Even then it might be the last of a generation, and very expensive for what you get.
Something to consider is the effect of the bus on communications. Considering aall the things expected from DX10 itself a bridge and the limited access of AGP may remove alot of benefits.
I thought having a DX 10 card with DX 10 drivers from the manufactuer will work in XP.
Dx10 is Vista only. You can run a dx10 card with xp (like everyones been doing with the 8800s) but you cant use any dx10's features without vista.
Also, you can run a dx9 card in vista no problem, but you wont be able to play any dx10 versions of games or play any games at all that are dx10 only (which don't exist yet anyway.)
According to microsoft, dx10 was created to work with the new driver model that comes with Vista, and they are unable (or unwilling) to tweak things to make dx10 run on xp. Theres no such thing as a dx10 driver for xp.
I think it unlikely that there will be any AGP DX10 cards and if so they will be very expensive.
I mean I can't talk because I'm currently using AGP and at only 4x at that due to my 4 year old machine.
But seriously, it's time to upgrade, I know I will be at some time this year. Possibly when R600 and Nvidias next gen DX10 (presumably 8900 series if they follow their naming scheme) come out.
Are you sure PCIe 1.0 cards will work in a mobo with PCIe 2.0 slots?
Quote :
When asked about the cost effectiveness of PCIe 2.0, a PCI-SIG representative claimed "A PCI Express 1.1 x8 link (8 lanes) yields a total aggregate bandwidth of 4GBytes/s, which is the same bandwidth obtained from a PCI Express 2.0 x4 link (4 lanes) that adopts the 5GT/s signaling technology. This can result in significant savings in platform implementation cost while achieving the same performance level. Backward compatibility is retained as existing 2.5 GT/S adapters can plug into 5.0 GT/S slots and will run at the slower rate. Conversely, new PCIe 2.0 adapters running at 5.0 GT/S can plug into existing PCIe slots and run at the slower rate of 2.5 GT/S." Both 2.5GT/s and 5GT/s signaling are retained in the 2.0 specification
Yep ,,They sure will...
Look , they are selling every agp x1950pro they make, its always out of stock !!! they sell out in a hour !!!!!!! and thats just a x1950pro ..
DX-10 card will sell 2x times faster , why , it just will..
AGP people are power hungry , even if they can't use it fully !
Its just a fast power fix ...
AGP people will buy without giving it much thought...
That makes them the #1 best customer !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
no i doubt they will. i don't see much reason them carrying it on. dx10 is just the excuse they need to not produce an AGP card. since dx9 agp cards were available people expect dx9 cards to still be produced but with dx10 it is almost a get out of jail card for the manufacturers. might be wrong but that is how it seems.
oh and thank god so far in this thread nobody has said that agp will be a bottleneck due to the card being so powerful. that usually creeps into these threads.
Well I kinda infered AGP would be a bottleneck, but for the non-traditional things (like physics, procedural stuff, replication, etc.), not for the usual graphics stuff. Also not sure what latency would add.
hah, im not sure of that but i know one thing and that is it'll be a long way off before game devs actually make use of dx10 capabilities.
for things other than the typical output only side of gfx cards perhaps the duplex nature of the pci-e will finally show a few more of the benefits people have been going on about since its inception.
still, i have little hope of people being forward thinking and reckon there will be nothing stopping DX10 AGP cards other than how to fit all those molex connectors onto the cards themselves
I hope there are no AGP DX10 cards. It's time to phase AGP out. I bit the bullet and upgraded. Consumers pay more for AGP cards anyhow. I'm afraid the AGP format is going nowhere and I hope it stays that way. PCI Express FTW!
can't see AGP dying just yet. no further development yes, dying out no. high end card are not the bread and butter of gfx card maekrs and neither i would think is PCi-e just yet.
this is always gives a good indication of what hardware people have.
According to microsoft, dx10 was created to work with the new driver model that comes with Vista, and they are unable (or unwilling) to tweak things to make dx10 run on xp.
It's there way of getting people to buy vista. I'm sure if they wanted to, they could do it for xp.
Anyone hear if their are plans for an AGP card with Direct X 10.
Just let AGP die already.
In fact, the floppy drive needs to die as well.
What about serial and parallel ports as well? I think USB, SATA and firewire have pretty much taken control of any external peripheral connections by this point...
Does any AGP video card actually max out the bandwith of 8x AGP?
I don't really care either way if they make a DX10 card for AGP. By the time the games are "DX10 Only" they will be rolling out the succesor to the PCI-e slot. I mean, there are hardly any games that are even "DX9 Only". That all being said, I am still running an AGP x800gto, and I am quite happy with the performance. I have not had a reason to go spend a small fortune trying to upgrade my whole system to take advantage of DX10 or PCI-E.
Really, its all just a ploy to get you all to spend money on Vista. Which is funny to me, because I think Windows XP is a very good and stable OS, figuring you know how to do simple things like remove spyware, clean your registry, defrag, etc... In fact, I haven't had a system generated crash for over a year or so. The only time I have crashed is when I tried to OC my cpu a little to hard. So way to go, Vista people.
I am going to have to completely agree with this post. There really isn't a reason to go to vista at this point. XP provides some great features that are also available on vista now. Everyone is telling you that its pertinent to upgrade to vista, or the world will come to a screeching halt. I'm sorry...no it won't. Maybe once games play really well on vista with the hardware that is SUPPOSED to be vista-ready, (and they have patched most of the initial major issues...i.e. SP1) I will go ahead and upgrade. I did the same thing from W2k when XP came out...I waited and was happy I did.
although people have said the same about 98 and 2k, is this actually going be the OS that no one wants to change from. have microsoft made too good an OS. after all, it has been around for 5-6 years and i personally have not been clammering for a new one.
what is do you think, XP too good or vista not good enough?
I have always been one of those people to say, "If it ain't broke...".
That being said, I haven't even seen Vista in action. It may be cool and new stuff is always exciting, but I just don't feel the need... yet. I am sure there will be a day when I actually get Vista. But for me, it's not an option until I fully upgrade my system. I know it would run on my current PC, but it is going to run worse than XP. And everything I play runs great, so why waste the money? There isn't even any DX10 games yet (that I am aware of). You would think they would want to have one or two at Vista launch. Other than DX10, what are the other big improvements of Vista?
I really am curious, though... Does any card actually max out AGP 8x bandwith? :?:
tbh, i have only seen one person argue with me on this one so this is my opinon. gfx cards do not decide how much the bandwidth is used. that is the CPU and the game itself. the gfx card renders the info it is given. so no, IMO no matter how powerful gfx cards get, until games need more info sent from the CPU to the gfx card it will never saturate it.
As far as i know there will not be any DX10 AGP cards made.AGP is dying and all the new technology is being designed and built around PCI EXPRESS.As far as video cards are concerned anyways.Sorry to burst your bubble of hope.
However, being that it is the INQ and that TGGA suspects they will be low-end (8300-8400s) I'll stick with my original assessment that the outlook still does not look bright.
As far as i know there will not be any DX10 AGP cards made.AGP is dying and all the new technology is being designed and built around PCI EXPRESS.As far as video cards are concerned anyways.Sorry to burst your bubble of hope.
Considering most recent and "high" end AGP cards are just PCI-E cards with bridge chips for AGP, surely this is irrelevant.
Synergy6
Sure,but the newest and greatest that are coming out right now require a wider bandwidth than agp provides.So I don't believe we'll see and agp version of the 8800gtx or gts.
Sure,but the newest and greatest that are coming out right now require a wider bandwidth than agp provides.So I don't believe we'll see and agp version of the 8800gtx or gts.
Dahak
lol, most noobish and dumbass comment of the year unless you can back that up. lol, STFU.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.