If you OC well however, I suppose you could hit 3.6 with your P4. If so, the X1950 could be used well....
Dude does not know squat. Do not give him any crazy ideas about OC, he will only break his PC.
To OP: Dude, do not OC anything. Really.
oh come on! I OWN a prescott p4 2.4 ghz. I hit 3.0 with stock. I've heard that Northwoods are similar to my p4, so i offered my own opinion.
Granted, my knowledge was based on my 0.9 micron P4, compared to the 1.3 micron; so I agree, 3.6 is pushing it. But 3.0 is much more realistic...
The main reason I suggested OCIng at all is due to the P4 OC guide in the stickies.
Northwood was a much better and more efficient use of the Netburst architecture than Prescott could ever hope to be. Going to 3.6ghz on a Northwood with the stock cooler is perfectly reasonlable. If Intel had stuck with Northwood, increased the Cache to 2MB, upped the FSB to 1066 and gone to 65nm i reckon it would be competitive agaisnt K8. Especially if in Dual Core format, would be much better than the Pentium D series.
Then again, that is all just my opinion and speculation.
well, I really cant comment on that as I dont know that much about Northwood besides the fact that its a older micron process...
It has less Pipelines to process information through (20vs30) and used quite a lot less heat. I'm sure someone like Jack could give you a mroe detailed comparison.
really? Besides the die shift, what were the (atleast supposed) improvements with prescott from Northwood? I would expect to have a significant improvement in other areas if they were to go from 20 to 30...
Not so sure about improvements, overall it was a less efficient use of Netburst mhz for mhz than Northwood. Only thing it was better at was media enconding probably because of the larger L2 Cache size (1mb vs 512kb)