Hi,
Ive recently upgraded my video card and monitor and would like to know if i should be using the regular dvi cable or should i go for dvi-d if possible to connect my video card to the monitor. the different cables are just confusing me. any help would be appreciated to get the best out of the 24 inch widescreen.
thanks in advance for your help
congradualations on the monitor, many people dream to get the 2407
But doesn't the 2407 has two ports? I think you are supposed to connect both dvi ports, I don't know which would be better, but generally using the one that came with the screen is better, but I think checking out that link from track would be the best way to find out. And does the 2407 work with any other gfx cards? Because if it only fails to work with the gts, maybe the drivers don't support it (highly unlikely to be a problem) or there is a problem with the gts. Try switching monitors and switching gfx cards, because if you still get problems with trying both methods, then try different cables. All I can really say
Ok, than it is their 30" that has two dvi ports, and as I thought, usually using the provided cable works best
Just two questions, does the 2407 have hdcp support or no, and do you need a hdmi connecter for hdcp. Once I get the money, I want to get a big 24" monitor or 23" (just want the 1920*1200 resolution) and I have heard the 2407 probably one of the best on the market, plus I will be getting either an 8800gtx, an r600 or whatever the new best card on the market is, so I just want to know this now, it would help me out a lot
It is HDCP, and it will work over the DVI port...no HDMI on the monitor, and not needed....unless you want to hook up a cable box or dvd player with HDMI, then obviously you can't.
EDIE: Last I looked the price came down since they released the 27" at CES too. It's $674 now, I paid $719 in October or so.
Thanks guys for the help. im upgrading from my samsung syncmaster 191t, so im expecting a major difference , should i keep the 191t as a second monitor? since the 8800 has two outputs?
It is HDCP, and it will work over the DVI port...no HDMI on the monitor, and not needed....unless you want to hook up a cable box or dvd player with HDMI, then obviously you can't.
EDIE: Last I looked the price came down since they released the 27" at CES too. It's $674 now, I paid $719 in October or so.
ehh, not really worth it, the 2407 is more than enough for the gts, especially with high amounts of aa and hdr, plus, I see no need, the 2407 is massive and it would just be weird to game with a 2407 and a 191t
It is HDCP, and it will work over the DVI port...no HDMI on the monitor, and not needed....unless you want to hook up a cable box or dvd player with HDMI, then obviously you can't.
EDIE: Last I looked the price came down since they released the 27" at CES too. It's $674 now, I paid $719 in October or so.
you are aware of dvi to hdmi cables, right?
just making sure...
Sure, but when you throw HDCP into the mix...not all consumer electronics devices will WORK properly with an HDMI to DVI cable. I have two here that DON'T. They will only play unprotected content.
I think that whoever can afford stuff like blue-ray or other high-def content that need the hdmi port, getting a monitor with a hdmi port should be the least of their problems, especially when there are some pretty cheap ones
It is HDCP, and it will work over the DVI port...no HDMI on the monitor, and not needed....unless you want to hook up a cable box or dvd player with HDMI, then obviously you can't.
EDIE: Last I looked the price came down since they released the 27" at CES too. It's $674 now, I paid $719 in October or so.
you are aware of dvi to hdmi cables, right?
just making sure...
Sure, but when you throw HDCP into the mix...not all consumer electronics devices will WORK properly with an HDMI to DVI cable. I have two here that DON'T. They will only play unprotected content.
sure they will. DVI is just as capable of HDCP as HDMI is. cables don't do anything to the HDCP stream... or in other words, there's no such thing as an "HDCP" approved DVI or HDCP capable. the standard only applies to hardware. the only real difference between hdmi and DVI is...
the connector
hdmi can carry an audio signal
otherwise, the video signal sent over hdmi and DVI is identical. hdcp is encoded into the video signal. hdmi is capable of higher bandwidth, but that has nothing to do with the video signal being transmitted.
I think that whoever can afford stuff like blue-ray or other high-def content that need the hdmi port, getting a monitor with a hdmi port should be the least of their problems, especially when there are some pretty cheap ones
right. the trick is making sure the display is HDCP enabled. believe it or not, not all are. my 42 inch sony hdtv has an hdmi port, but no hdcp support!!!!!!!!!
I know that, because when I tried finding a hdcp supported monitor on newegg, I set the search to only find monitors with a hdmi port, yet only 1 of them actually supported hdcp
Use the standard DVi cable will be fine...I thought about the Dell but I went with the Gateway 24 inch 1080p and Hdcp supported monitor($679) at BB,and I love it! It has just one Dvi and 2 component no HDMI. There are no high end video cards yet that have hdmi so wouldnt worry about it. 1920 x 1200 is friking awesome with my evga superclocked 8800 gts. Well worth the money on both counts! I do like the look fo the Dell monitors though.
...correct its 1080p ready as its advertised. All monitors should be 1080p at 1920 x 1200 but only Gateways is advertised as such that Ive seen so far, I have yet to see it yet hooked to a 1080p source, but games like Company of Heroes and BF 2142 look perfect!
The number 1080 represents 1,080 lines of vertical resolution,[1] while the letter p stands for progressive scan or non-interlaced. 1080p is considered an HDTV video mode. The term usually assumes a widescreen aspect ratio of 16:9, implying a horizontal (display) resolution of 1920 dots across and a frame resolution of 1920 × 1080 or about 2.07 million pixels
-wikipedia
Don't believe me? Google 1080p and see the results
But that's completely useless, because you always want to run lcd's at their natural resolutions, you'd want to keep the 16:9 ratio, and not change that. I think considering the 2407 is only 650 on dell's site right now, that would have been the better deal.
Aside from all the 1080p talk here, both monitors are great purchases if you want a bright HD image for gaming or movies via DVI. I bought the Gateway because Best Buy is right down the road and they had 2 on the shelf. Im sure the Dell is just as good with an equal set up as mine. If you can afford it go for it, hopefully all new games coming will support 1920 x 1200,Im looking forward to Crysis , World in Conflict and Graw 2 to start.. with Vista and Direct x 10...
right... but i'm pretty sure that display supports 1920x1080. so it should be able to do 1080 without having to change the aspect ratio. i could be wrong though....
i'm pretty sure i'm not because my 19 widescreen LCD has a native res. of 1440x900, which, as you know is a little better than 720p. but my hdtv OTA receiver hooked up to it looks completely normal.... no stretching or anything. so clearly that display is capable of 1280x720.
so... i'm pretty sure that 24 incher can do 1920x1080.
They are all capable, but you generally want to run lcd's at their natural resolution, as they use crystals instead of electrons, so changing the resolution in generall is not a good idea. Here's an excellent deal on a 10080p plasma 42", only 1200, very nice deal right there if you can afford it
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6889187013
Doesnt the Dell30" just have 1xDVI (dual link) input, same as the Dell 24"? Only difference is you need 2x DVI (dual link) at the gpu end, the 24" doesnt.
What other people have forgotten to specify is to make sure you are using 1x DVI (dual link) cable to get 1920x1200 resolution as a single link cable will stop you at 1920x1080. Dual link does not imply that it is like the dell30" setup, the 30" needs 2xDVI Dual link (splitter @gpu end), you dont need 2x duallink, only 1x duallink.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.