X1950XT(beats X1900XT)
http://www.overclockercafe.com/Reviews/VGA/HIS_X1950XT_IceQ3/index.htm
Is this a reliable article, because I'm sure these cards have 3 times the pipelines listed in the spec table......
It gets confusing now on just what is a pipeline. The X19xx series feature a 3:1 ALU to texture unit ratio so the X1950XT is 16 pixel pipelines but 48 pixel shaders. The Pro is 12 pipelines but 36 pixel shaders. So ATI's marketing will say they have 36 or 48 shader processors, which should not be confused with pixel pipelines. But at the same time, in comparisons you can't just look at the X19xx's as 12 or 16 pipe cards like in the old days.
No, you're right, just read about this elsewhere. Well, my dilemma is this really(without trying to duplicate a thread I started earlier
).....
I was going to buy an 8800 GTX, but cancelled my order to wait for R600. Spending that kind of money I want to be sure I have the best available, so some DX10 benchmarks will come in handy, as there should be a few DX10 games out in March.
I just need a card to last until then (so 3 months max) that will allow me to play games at high settings at 1280 x 1024. Obviously the cheaper the better, and I've narrowed the choice to:
512MB MSI 7900 GTO £163;
256MB Sapphire X1950Pro £127;
256MB Sapphire X1950XT £165.
The X1950Pro seems best value, but I also have to consider the prospects for resale, and here in the UK on EBay there isn't one X1950Pro for sale (although I suppose they are quite new aren't they?). Getting the X1950Pro would allow me to minimise potential losses, but the GTO might sell best to the uninitiated who think that 512MB makes it the best..... what do you think?