XP SP2 policy Execptions

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (More info?)

I have configured lots of exceptions in the GPO (prior to distibuting the SP
itself), while this was much easier than anticipated there is one glaring
error on MS's part: You can't edit the exception entries!!

Having added the following (and another 20+ similair entries):

12345:TCP:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24:enabled:My Custom App

I can't go back and edit it to add another subnet (or correct spelling
errors etc etc)...


I can think of no technical reason why this functionality would not have
been added, it must be an oversight - either way it's a pain in the arse!

Is there any way of editing the strings by other means???




__
Matt

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (More info?)

Hi Matt

This behaviour seems consistent with the way all policies of this type have
been implemented. "Run only allowed Windows Applications" is an example.

I don't know of another way to edit these strings. They're stored in the
appropriate .pol file and it's not straight text.

Kind regards
--
Mark Renoden [MSFT]
Windows Platform Support Team
Email: markreno@online.microsoft.com

Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email
me; I'll post a response back to the group.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Matt (IS Team)" <matt.groves@magnetic-SPAM-TRAP-north.com> wrote in message
news:%235kZhBalEHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
> I have configured lots of exceptions in the GPO (prior to distibuting the
> SP itself), while this was much easier than anticipated there is one
> glaring error on MS's part: You can't edit the exception entries!!
>
> Having added the following (and another 20+ similair entries):
>
> 12345:TCP:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24:enabled:My Custom App
>
> I can't go back and edit it to add another subnet (or correct spelling
> errors etc etc)...
>
>
> I can think of no technical reason why this functionality would not have
> been added, it must be an oversight - either way it's a pain in the arse!
>
> Is there any way of editing the strings by other means???
>
>
>
>
> __
> Matt
>