Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (
More info?)
>>> Salut/Hi Bruce Chambers,
>>>
>>> le/on Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:38:55 -0700, tu disais/you said:-
>>>
>>>> It's claimed to be, but I'm skeptical. It may lack most of the
>>>> built-in spyware, but it's still a huge security whole. You'll still
>>>> be giving everyone else with Kazaa direct access to your hard drive.
>>>> Are you really that willing to trust the whole world with the
>>>> contents of your hard drive?
>>>
>>> What? Including Mbongo Mbongo in Uganda, who has no electricity, and
>>> has never heard of computers. Don't you think you're being a _touch_
>>> careless in
>>> your use of language?
>>>>
>>>> Also remember, the primary purpose of both Kazaa and Kazaa Lite is to
>>>> facilitate the illegal distribution of copyrighted materials. The
>>>> people who are in the habit of such distribution would be completely
>>>> without integrity,
>>>
>>> Hmm, Bruce, that's rather an extreme view.
>>>
>>> I guess 90% of the population would regard copying a pop record
>>> illegally as
>>> being entirely different from snooping through private papers.
>>>
>>> In fact I believe that statistically, something like 90% of employees
>>> have no sense of wrong in "relieving" their employer of paper, writing
>>> material etc, nor in making private phone calls/emails on company
>>> time. They do not regard such as theft (in the case of office
>>> material) or dishonestly obtaining services. I'm not saying I agree
>>> with them, merely trying to show
>>> you that your view is somewhat eccentric.
>>>
>>>> and so cannot be trusted not to include viruses,
>>>> worms, Trojans, and more with anything they "share."
>>>
>>> If they did, it would be more likely that they did so in ignorance
>>> rather than malice. There are many differing views of what is honest
>>> and what is dishonest.
>>>
>>> That said, I've no intention of using or having anything to do with
>>> Kazaa. --
>>> All the Best
>>> Ian Hoare
>>>
http://www.souvigne.com
>>> mailbox full to avoid spam. try me at website
Colin Barnhorst wrote:
>> Then why the comment?
The post could very easily been answerd without the pontificating. IMHO