Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > New problem to do with E6600, one core is constantly on 100%

New problem to do with E6600, one core is constantly on 100%

Forum Overclocking : CPUs - New problem to do with E6600, one core is constantly on 100%

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Hey, as you can see from the previous thread I fixed the problem with windows not recognizing both my cores but now I have a new issue. In task manager and CPU history the first core onthe left is constnatly on 90-100%?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

This is a picture to show what I mean, this is when the computer is just idling or browsing

http://img406.imageshack.us/img406 [...] oad8ly.jpg

Reply to YellowJello

How many programs do have running at start-up?
Have you done a virus scan or checked for ad-ware?

Reply to jitpublisher

I literelly just formatted, there is nothing installed. Also this has happened twice now, first time it happened I formatted again and it is still happening, very few programs are starting up when booting.

Reply to YellowJello

http://img260.imageshack.us/img260 [...] oad4sh.jpg

I'm installing windows updates right now so it will have a bit of load on it, but nothing like that is happening on the left. As you can see nothing is using any time except for the updater.

Reply to YellowJello

Do you have that stupid Windows recovery program program running?
Especially if this a new installation, it could be running making the "mirror image" of your system.

Reply to jitpublisher

Well how would I know? I haven't heard of it or noticed it before so I doubt it.

Reply to YellowJello

Contol panel, System, System Restore.

Reply to jitpublisher

It was running but disabling it had no effect.

Reply to YellowJello

I found this, don't really know WHAT it is but this could be the trouble.

"What is mscorsvw.exe and why is it eating up my CPU? What is this new CLR Optimization Service?
Short version:

mscorsvw.exe is precompiling .NET assemblies in the background. Once it's done, it will go away. Typically, after you install the .NET Redist, it will be done with the high priority assemblies in 5 to 10 minutes and then will wait until your computer is idle to process the low priority assemblies. Once it does that it will shutdown and you won't see mscorsvw.exe. One important thing is that while you may see 100% CPU usage, the compilation happens in a process with low priority, so it tries not to steal the CPU for other stuff you are doing. Once everything is compiled, assemblies will now be able to share pages across different processes and warm start up will be typically much faster, so we're not throwing away your cycles."

Reply to jitpublisher

Yeah that's not it, I think that was just a file that was installing .NET via windows update.

Maybe some more information here?

Name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Description: x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
Manufacturer : GenuineIntel
Version : Model 15, Stepping 6
DataWidth : 32 Bits
Socket Designation : Socket 775
Type : Central Processor
CPU Id : BFEBFBFF000006F6
CPU Family : Unknown
CPU Stepping : 6
Load Percentage : 85 %
Max ClockSpeed : 2395 MHz
Current ClockSpeed : 2395 MHz
Voltage : 1.3 V
External Clock : 266 MHz
Upgrade Method : ZIF Socket
L2 Cache Size : 4096 Kb
Display Availability : Running/Full Power
PowerManagement Supported : false
Status : OK

Name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Description: x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
Manufacturer : GenuineIntel
Version : Model 15, Stepping 6
DataWidth : 32 Bits
Socket Designation : Socket 775
Type : Central Processor
CPU Id : BFEBFBFF000006F6
CPU Family : Unknown
CPU Stepping : 6
Load Percentage : 0 %
Max ClockSpeed : 2395 MHz
Current ClockSpeed : 2395 MHz
Voltage : 1.3 V
External Clock : 266 MHz
Upgrade Method : ZIF Socket
L2 Cache Size : 4096 Kb
Display Availability : Running/Full Power
PowerManagement Supported : false
Status : OK

Reply to YellowJello

Well, since you are currently updating and loading new software, wait till you are completely done, then give it a few and see if the usage goes down. It could be an IRQ conflict with a card in your system, or a program stuck in a loop. I don't see anything right off either that would keep the one core so high.

Reply to jitpublisher

that is it. it shows in task manager it is eating 59%of your cpu

Reply to triggerhappy

Quote :

Yeah that's not it, I think that was just a file that was installing .NET via windows update.

Maybe some more information here?

Name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Description: x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
Manufacturer : GenuineIntel
Version : Model 15, Stepping 6
DataWidth : 32 Bits
Socket Designation : Socket 775
Type : Central Processor
CPU Id : BFEBFBFF000006F6
CPU Family : Unknown
CPU Stepping : 6
Load Percentage : 85 %
Max ClockSpeed : 2395 MHz
Current ClockSpeed : 2395 MHz
Voltage : 1.3 V
External Clock : 266 MHz
Upgrade Method : ZIF Socket
L2 Cache Size : 4096 Kb
Display Availability : Running/Full Power
PowerManagement Supported : false
Status : OK

Name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Description: x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
Manufacturer : GenuineIntel
Version : Model 15, Stepping 6
DataWidth : 32 Bits
Socket Designation : Socket 775
Type : Central Processor
CPU Id : BFEBFBFF000006F6
CPU Family : Unknown
CPU Stepping : 6
Load Percentage : 0 %
Max ClockSpeed : 2395 MHz
Current ClockSpeed : 2395 MHz
Voltage : 1.3 V
External Clock : 266 MHz
Upgrade Method : ZIF Socket
L2 Cache Size : 4096 Kb
Display Availability : Running/Full Power
PowerManagement Supported : false
Status : OK



I'm with JPub, since the screenshot of your running processes only showed mscorsvw.exe is the only thing other than the idle thread using CPU cycles. Maybe you could do another screenshot of your running processes, this time sort the CPU usage column to have the highest use items at the top. Click the CPU column title like three times and it will sort them in descending order. This will help determine for sure which process is using the most CPU resources. If your convinced that it's not mscorsvw.exe, then wait to take the screenshot until something besides it and the idle process show up at the top of the list. Other than that, here is the link that JITPub and I found:

http://blogs.msdn.com/davidnotario [...] 12838.aspx

Reply to techgeek

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/6360/another9ow.jpg

This picture is me idling, you can see my processes and CPU usage, as you can see I am getting 99% idle and one core still being fully used.

That file was from when I was updating the .NET framework, it isn't htere anymore.

Reply to YellowJello

Are you using a static IP address, and do you have your firewall installed yet?

Reply to jitpublisher

I'm using a router via ethernet cable but can put it wireless any time, windows firewall is turned off and i'm just using the router. I do not think my IP is static.

Reply to YellowJello

If you unplug your internet connection, does it still do the same thing?

Reply to jitpublisher

Quote :

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/6360/another9ow.jpg

This picture is me idling, you can see my processes and CPU usage, as you can see I am getting 99% idle and one core still being fully used.

That file was from when I was updating the .NET framework, it isn't htere anymore.



Now I believe something weird is occurring. Core 0 is nearly used up entirely while the other is idling, and you don't have any processes using up the CPU cylces. When I run a process (UD) which uses all up the resources of one core, even though it is singlethreaded, it distributes the load slightly like 80-20 (that's on individual cores). With yours it's like running the one at nearly 100% while showing that the idle process is running at 97%. This lead me to believe that Windows is still seeing your CPU as a single core in some manner. There is no way that it should be showing 97% on the idle thread and have one core used up like that, it should be saying like 50% on the idle thread.

Now you mentioned that you "solved" a problem where Windows wasn't recognizing it as dual core. If this isn't something to do with a conflict of some type, this maybe something to do with your original problem. Could you provide a link to the other post you mention.

Reply to techgeek

Hmmm. Can you give us a list of all the hardware in your system?

Reply to jitpublisher

what if you checked show processes from all users?

Reply to triggerhappy

Show proccess changes nothing.

I haven't installed everything just incase but right now i've got

8800 GTS
1gb DDR2 400 mhz
MSI P965 NEO-F
Maxtor 6Y200P0

That's about it.

Reply to YellowJello

Have you installed graphics drivers, if not install them and see if that changes anything. Maybe without drivers the CPU is having to handle the desktop display under Standard VGA adapter.

EDIT: Never mind, I just looked back at your first screenshot, I see the nVidia System Tray icon.

Reply to techgeek

I don't know if this would help but maybe try shutting down proccess that don't include the actual o.s. could an improperly seated cpu cause something like this?

Reply to triggerhappy

I was thinking it coudl be that too but I put everything together again and nothing changed.

Reply to YellowJello

To be honest, I imagine that most of us are in the dark on this one. For myself, I have never seen a problem like this one, especially not when the system is new and just had Windows installed (ie no chance for spyware/virus). It seems to me that it would be something hardware related. He also mentioned that on previous install attempt, Windows would not recognize the other core. Hey Yellow could you provide a link to the other thread where you had the above mentioned problem. Maybe that could shed some light on this problem, honestly I think the two are related.

Reply to techgeek

I'm thinking of doing this, making an nLite unattended windows install that will make it think I have a multiproccesor pc instead of stand like before, I guess this is where the porlbme is stemming from

Right now it says I have a MPS Multiprocessor PC, should it be ACPI?

Reply to YellowJello

I think that must be the prolbme, MPS says it applys to non APCI computers, but every modern computer supposrts APCI?

Reply to YellowJello

flash to newest bios and install the xp hotfix for dual core cpu's. if that doesnt work then rma the cpu and mobo.

Reply to eagles453809

I thought the dual core hot fix only applied when cool and quiet was being used?

Reply to YellowJello

im not sure, you may be right. worth a try though at this point right?

Reply to eagles453809

... look at this link.

http://blogs.msdn.com/davidnotario [...] 12838.aspx

It looks like your dotnet is screwed up. He addresses two possibilities for why your process is eating all the CPU time. COnsidering it seems he helped write the program its quite likely he knows what he is talking about...

Reply to kamel5547

Decided to RMA the motherboard and processor, tried everything including that link and no difference. Lets hope Ebuyer are quick about it and replace it.

Reply to YellowJello

Something was deffintely wrong with the hardware I think, windows installed 3x faster on this AMD 64 3200+ than my E6600 :/

Reply to YellowJello
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > New problem to do with E6600, one core is constantly on 100%
Go to:

There are 1132 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them