I am configuring a new computer and am uncertain whether the Asus P5W DH Deluxe or the P5B Deluxe (not WiFi) is the better choice. I've read the TechReport comparison, which was helpful, but am not sure how important the ability to set the multiplier is. I'd appreciate comments.
My primary need for speed is image processing, particularly raw conversion with Nikon Capture and other raw converters and editing with Photoshop CS2.
I want the system to be both quiet and fast. I'd like to achieve 3.6 MHz on the E6700 (or Xeon 3070). I think that quad core would not offer noticeable advantage for my applications, but maximizing memory will. I will run Windows XP, probably for at least two years before considering Vista.
This will be my first experience with overclocking, so I am uncertain how important some o/c features are.
The configuration I am looking at is this:
o Antec P180B case
o SeaSonic S12 Energy Plus SS-650HT PSU
o Asus P5W DH Deluxe or P5B Deluxe (no WiFi)
o E6700 or Xeon 3070
o Tuniq Tower 120
o 4 GB PC6400 (DDR2-800) RAM, Cas4
o 150 GB Raptor as boot drive, 320 GB Seagate 7200.10 as scratch and work drive, two Samsung 400 GB drives in RAID 0 for data
o Floppy drive, 18x DVD RW (both IDE)
o Gigabyte GV-NX76T256D-RH GeForce 7600GT 256MB fanless video card
As I understand it, the pros and cons of the two motherboards as they might affect me are:
P5W Pros:
o Marginally faster
o Better second GigE port
With only three 3.0 Gb/s SATA ports through the ICH7R, I would have to run on of the hard drives (probably the Seagate) through a 1.5 Gb/s SATA port. I'm not sure whether that will have a measurable effect or not.
P5B Deluxe Pros:
o Can change multiplier of processor downwards
o ICH8R supports 4 3.0 Gb/s hard drives
How useful is it likely to be to be able to reduce the multiplier on the E6700? At the default of 10, FSB of 360 would give me 3.6 MHz and be comfortably within DDR2-800 specs. A multiplier of 9 with FSB of 400 would give the same 3.6 result, with memory still within specs. I do not have a clear understanding of how useful that second option might be and would appreciate guidance.
Thanks!
Guy
My primary need for speed is image processing, particularly raw conversion with Nikon Capture and other raw converters and editing with Photoshop CS2.
I want the system to be both quiet and fast. I'd like to achieve 3.6 MHz on the E6700 (or Xeon 3070). I think that quad core would not offer noticeable advantage for my applications, but maximizing memory will. I will run Windows XP, probably for at least two years before considering Vista.
This will be my first experience with overclocking, so I am uncertain how important some o/c features are.
The configuration I am looking at is this:
o Antec P180B case
o SeaSonic S12 Energy Plus SS-650HT PSU
o Asus P5W DH Deluxe or P5B Deluxe (no WiFi)
o E6700 or Xeon 3070
o Tuniq Tower 120
o 4 GB PC6400 (DDR2-800) RAM, Cas4
o 150 GB Raptor as boot drive, 320 GB Seagate 7200.10 as scratch and work drive, two Samsung 400 GB drives in RAID 0 for data
o Floppy drive, 18x DVD RW (both IDE)
o Gigabyte GV-NX76T256D-RH GeForce 7600GT 256MB fanless video card
As I understand it, the pros and cons of the two motherboards as they might affect me are:
P5W Pros:
o Marginally faster
o Better second GigE port
With only three 3.0 Gb/s SATA ports through the ICH7R, I would have to run on of the hard drives (probably the Seagate) through a 1.5 Gb/s SATA port. I'm not sure whether that will have a measurable effect or not.
P5B Deluxe Pros:
o Can change multiplier of processor downwards
o ICH8R supports 4 3.0 Gb/s hard drives
How useful is it likely to be to be able to reduce the multiplier on the E6700? At the default of 10, FSB of 360 would give me 3.6 MHz and be comfortably within DDR2-800 specs. A multiplier of 9 with FSB of 400 would give the same 3.6 result, with memory still within specs. I do not have a clear understanding of how useful that second option might be and would appreciate guidance.
Thanks!
Guy