Password Policy

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (More info?)

Within my domain i have several password policies in effect. I need to
change a password on one account that has been inadvertly changed. However
doing this will defy the passwod policy in place for the domian. Can I 1
change the policy in Gtoup policy wait for replication to occur and then
change the password. Then chnage the policy back. Is their an alternative.

George

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (More info?)

Where are your various password policies linked at within the domain
structure? You can have only one password policy for a domain.

Intrigued,

Ken

"George Schneider" <GeorgeSchneider@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:CA828B44-F754-4D97-A46C-C3937ADF6C3E@microsoft.com...
> Within my domain i have several password policies in effect. I need to
> change a password on one account that has been inadvertly changed.
> However
> doing this will defy the passwod policy in place for the domian. Can I 1
> change the policy in Gtoup policy wait for replication to occur and then
> change the password. Then chnage the policy back. Is their an
> alternative.
>
> George

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy (More info?)

I figured out what I needed to do. Thanks anyways.

"Ken B" wrote:

> Where are your various password policies linked at within the domain
> structure? You can have only one password policy for a domain.
>
> Intrigued,
>
> Ken
>
> "George Schneider" <GeorgeSchneider@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:CA828B44-F754-4D97-A46C-C3937ADF6C3E@microsoft.com...
> > Within my domain i have several password policies in effect. I need to
> > change a password on one account that has been inadvertly changed.
> > However
> > doing this will defy the passwod policy in place for the domian. Can I 1
> > change the policy in Gtoup policy wait for replication to occur and then
> > change the password. Then chnage the policy back. Is their an
> > alternative.
> >
> > George
>
>
>