Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)
Hi,
Is there a limit on how many files there can be within a folder (not
including sub-folders)?
Recently I was helped in recategorization and archiving data on one machine
and some folders would really take an exceedingly long time to even open up
and reveal their contents - some of these folders contained over 2500 files
(mostly Word documents, HTMLs and MHTMLs).
Even selecting sequential multiple files would take minutes just for all the
highlighting to appear! It seemed to take ages just to redistribute a great
many files in new folders after a re-categorization.
That PC is exceedingly fast otherwise and reverted back to shape after the
archival operation was over. The job was done okay but it just had me
wondering. I work with a great many files too often but these are archived
on a regular basis so have not encountered this phenomenon before.
Regards and thanks in advance for any illumination.
"S_Nyaya" <satyanyaya@orion.nebula> wrote in message
news:ebFBqxvGFHA.2936@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Is there a limit on how many files there can be within a folder (not
> including sub-folders)?
>
> Recently I was helped in recategorization and archiving data on one
> machine
> and some folders would really take an exceedingly long time to even open
> up
> and reveal their contents - some of these folders contained over 2500
> files
> (mostly Word documents, HTMLs and MHTMLs).
>
> Even selecting sequential multiple files would take minutes just for all
> the
> highlighting to appear! It seemed to take ages just to redistribute a
> great
> many files in new folders after a re-categorization.
>
> That PC is exceedingly fast otherwise and reverted back to shape after the
> archival operation was over. The job was done okay but it just had me
> wondering. I work with a great many files too often but these are archived
> on a regular basis so have not encountered this phenomenon before.
>
> Regards and thanks in advance for any illumination.
>
> Satyanyaya
>
>
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)
Hi,
Thanks for the pointers. I appreciate it a lot.
Regards.
Satyanyaya
"S_Nyaya" <satyanyaya@orion.nebula> wrote in message
news:ebFBqxvGFHA.2936@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Is there a limit on how many files there can be within a folder (not
> including sub-folders)?
>
> Recently I was helped in recategorization and archiving data on one
> machine
> and some folders would really take an exceedingly long time to even open
> up
> and reveal their contents - some of these folders contained over 2500
> files
> (mostly Word documents, HTMLs and MHTMLs).
>
> Even selecting sequential multiple files would take minutes just for all
> the
> highlighting to appear! It seemed to take ages just to redistribute a
> great
> many files in new folders after a re-categorization.
>
> That PC is exceedingly fast otherwise and reverted back to shape after the
> archival operation was over. The job was done okay but it just had me
> wondering. I work with a great many files too often but these are archived
> on a regular basis so have not encountered this phenomenon before.
>
> Regards and thanks in advance for any illumination.
>
> Satyanyaya
>
>
>
>
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)
In news:ebFBqxvGFHA.2936@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl,
S_Nyaya <satyanyaya@orion.nebula> typed:
> Is there a limit on how many files there can be within a folder
> (not
> including sub-folders)?
FAT32 has a 64K limit on the number of entries. That's *entries*,
not files and folders, because files and folders with long file
names take multiple entries.
There's no limit for NTFS.
--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)
Ken Blake wrote:
> FAT32 has a 64K limit on the number of entries. That's *entries*,
> not files and folders, because files and folders with long file
> names take multiple entries.
Out of curiousity: How many entries will a long file name take? Two? More,
depending on the length of the filename?
I actually stumbled across this limitation just the other week, and I
couldn't get more than 65534 files (all short filenames) in a folder.
> Ken Blake wrote:
>> FAT32 has a 64K limit on the number of entries. That's
>> *entries*,
>> not files and folders, because files and folders with long
>> file
>> names take multiple entries.
>
> Out of curiousity: How many entries will a long file name take?
> Two?
> More, depending on the length of the filename?
At least two, but it depends upon the length of the filename.
--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup
> I actually stumbled across this limitation just the other week,
> and I
> couldn't get more than 65534 files (all short filenames) in a
> folder.
>Ken Blake wrote:
>> FAT32 has a 64K limit on the number of entries. That's *entries*,
>> not files and folders, because files and folders with long file
>> names take multiple entries.
>
>Out of curiosity: How many entries will a long file name take? Two? More,
>depending on the length of the filename?
From two to thirteen, depending on the length of the filename.
>I actually stumbled across this limitation just the other week, and I
>couldn't get more than 65534 files (all short filenames) in a folder.
Those files must all have had names fitting the DOS 8.3 spec. In that
case they take only a single directory entry.
BTW: An earlier post in this thread said that NTFS has no
files-per-folder limit. That's true, but there is a limit of
4,294,967,295 files per volume. See
http://www.microsoft.com/resources [...] l_tdrn.asp for FAT32 and NTFS limits.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)
Tim Slattery wrote:
>> I actually stumbled across this limitation just the other week, and I
>> couldn't get more than 65534 files (all short filenames) in a folder.
> Those files must all have had names fitting the DOS 8.3 spec.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.