Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (
More info?)
"Robert Nagle" <idiotprogrammer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fbef97c.0407031245.5ca7bc07@posting.google.com...
>
> Conceivably I could wait up to 6 months if the price drops are
> expected to be substantial.
>
> I haven't settled on an exact price range, but it's probably between
> 750-1500.
> If anyone wants to recommend specific features/models for that price
> range, here are my preferences:
>
> live alone in an apartment; size or bulkiness is not that big of a
> deal; more interested in fidelity (However, people in apartments move
> often, so it would be good if it doesn't weigh a ton). . .
> I'm guessing that I'm in the range for conventional CRT 36 inch, 4/3.
At this point, I tend to recommend standard analog (non-HD) CRTs if you're
looking for anything less than about 26", and 4:3 HD sets (CRT direct view)
for 27" to perhaps 32" (it just adds a couple hundred $ to the price of an
analog set of the same size). Anything much above that and the price is
getting such that most likely this will be a bit of an investment, in which
case it's more worthwhile looking for a 16:9 HD set.
The best balance of affordability with picture quality in sizes under 40" is
still usually direct-view CRT. But they are heavy and bulky -- think 150lbs
or so for the 30-34" sets. For larger sizes, the best price/performance
ratio is rear-projection CRT. These tend to require more setup and
calibration than most other technologies, are large and bulky, and can be
suceptible to burn in, but are otherwise a good choice.
Most every other technology is, at present, going to cost more than your
price range.
DLP may come down in price over the next year, but I'm not sure when or how
much. Perhaps by the holiday season these will be in a more interesting
price range and be a better choice. The newer models are claiming some
improvements in contrast and black levels as well, though the largest
improvements will be in more expensive models rather than the cheaper one.
This is the only technology that I'd necessarily recommend waiting for price
drops and quality improvements in the near term. This technology seems to be
displacing rear projection LCD and LCDOS in many manufacturers' lineups (at
least for the time being), and with new chips (some lower cost and slightly
better quality than previous generations, others substantially better
quality) and more competitors making sets, prices on DLPs could really come
down noticeably, while narrowing the quality gap in DLPs weaker areas. DLP
sets are also quite light and compact (some newer models may be as little as
7" deep, and they can be set on an appropriate sized table top or stand).
Direct-view LCD and plasma are way too expensive for what you get, in my
opinion, unless you absolutely need the flatness.
I'm not sure that I'd recommend front-projection setups for most users. They
can be great in some circumstances, if you know what you're doing as far as
setup, limitations, etc., or if you spend enough (they're not necessarily
cheaper than other types of TV), but probably not the best choice for the
average viewer.
Other than waiting for the DLPs to drop in price, you might want to consider
a slightly smaller 4:3 HD CRT (maybe 30") to last for the next few years,
but not spend so much that you'd feel bad about replacing it before too
long.