dougie

Distinguished
May 6, 2004
11
0
18,510
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Hi,

I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about if
I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98 before
xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp pro
to recognise that I have a license for both?

thanks

--
___,
\o
| |>
/ \ . l
____________o
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Formatting the drive defeats the purpose of upgrading because it destroys
everything on the drive. All you have to do is start Win98 and at the
desktop insert the XP cd. When the XP splash screen appears, select
install. That's it. All your files and settings will be preserved.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42202c82$0$5186$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Hi,
>
> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about
> if I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98
> before xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow
> xp pro to recognise that I have a license for both?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> ___,
> \o
> | |>
> / \ . l
> ____________o
>
 

Philo

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
465
0
18,780
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42202c82$0$5186$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Hi,
>
> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about
if
> I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98 before
> xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp pro
> to recognise that I have a license for both?
>


it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade of
win98

backup and data you need first...
then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
(you will get the option to format the drive)

during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
verification
but win98 does not need to be installed first..

believe me, i have done many upgrades
and a clean install is the way to go...
"inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
problems
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

dougie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about if
> I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98 before
> xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp pro
> to recognise that I have a license for both?
>
> thanks
>


Should it become necessary, sometime in the future, it's quite
possible to perform a clean installation using the Upgrade CD, provided
you have the true installation CD for the earlier OS.

Simply boot from the WinXP Upgrade CD. You'll be offered the
opportunity to delete, create, and format partitions as part of the
installation process. The Upgrade CD checks to see if a qualifying OS
is installed, and, if it finds none, it asks you to insert the
installation media (CD) of that OS. Unfortunately, an OEM
"Recovery/Restore" CD will not work for this purpose; you must have a
true installation CD, complete with the "\Win98" folder and *.cab
files, or the "\i386" folder of WinNT/2K.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 

jt

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
253
0
18,780
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about if
>I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98 before
>xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp pro
>to recognise that I have a license for both?
>
>thanks

You have several practical (although perhaps not strictly legal)
options when using the XP Pro upgrade disk.

1) A true upgrade to your Win 98 computer in which case you simply
stick in the XP Pro upgrade disk and proceed. Not advised.

2) A clean install of XP Pro to the old Win 98 computer, in which case
the best option is to simply Fdisk the Win 98 OS into oblivion
beforehand. Keep reading...

3) A clean install of XP Pro to a *new* computer, different from your
old Win 98 computer. In this case simply stick a virgin hard drive
into your new machine and install away. Keep reading...

For cases 2 and 3, the XP Pro "upgrade" installation will ask for a
Win 98 install CD for proof of ownership. Note that a Win 98 SE
upgrade CD will suffice for such proof.

If you want to do case 2 or 3 but you don't have a Win 98 install disk
for proof, then you can try to borrow one. Otherwise, you will have
to install XP Pro onto a system with Win 98 OS installed. If you are
building a new computer for your XP Pro system then simply clone your
working Win 98 hard drive and install the clone in the new computer.
It doesn't matter that your cloned drive might not actually boot to
Win 98 on your new computer (hardware conflicts etc). All that
matters is that the Win 98 OS is on the drive. Be warned, however,
that if you attempt to do a *clean* install of XP Pro using your XP
Pro *upgrade* CD onto a Win 98 computer that has more than one hard
drive partition available (C and D partitions for example), XP Pro
will *insist* on creating a dual boot system. Therefore, for the
special case detailed in this paragraph, simply make sure that the
drive with Win 98 on it has only one partition and that there is only
one hard drive in the new system when you attempt your clean install
using your XP Pro upgrade disk.

JT
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Check here http://www.webtree.ca/windowsxp/upgrade_tips.htm

--

Harry Ohrn MS-MVP [Shell/User]
www.webtree.ca/windowsxp


"dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42202c82$0$5186$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Hi,
>
> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about
if
> I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98 before
> xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp pro
> to recognise that I have a license for both?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> ___,
> \o
> | |>
> / \ . l
> ____________o
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Hi, Philo.

> it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade
> of
> win98

An upgrade from one version of Windows (Win98) to another (WinXP) is an
"upgrade", but not an "in-place upgrade".

An "in-place upgrade" is what we might call an upgrade from one version
(WinXP) to the same version (WinXP). See KB article 315341 for instructions
for doing this.
How to perform an in-place upgrade (reinstallation) of Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q315341

We frequently recommend an in-place upgrade when a user needs to reinstall
WinXP without destroying the existing Registry. The Registry is contained
in several files within the \Windows folder. It holds a lot of critical
information about the existing WinXP installation, including entries for all
the installed applications, users, etc. A "clean install" erases the
existing Registry and creates a new, empty one, with none of that history or
other information. A reformat, of course, would do that and much more. But
an in-place upgrade will reinstall WinXP itself while leaving most of the
Registry intact, preserving the installed applications and data, plus most
of the user's "tweaks". The in-place upgrade reinstalls the version that is
on the WinXP CD-ROM used, so a visit to Windows Update is urged -as soon as
the proper protection (firewall, antivirus, etc.) are in place - to be sure
that SP2 and any later updates are (re)installed.

> and a clean install is the way to go...
> "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
> problems

I agree with this (if we delete "inplace"). While many (most?) users have
success with an upgrade from Win98 to WinXP, others report - as you said -
that the "migration" of drivers and applications is less than 100%
successful. Many upgraders experience nagging minor hassles later and end
up doing a clean install after all. As you said, an upgrade from Win98 to
WinXP requires only that the Win98 CD be inserted momentarily to verify that
the upgrade is permissible.

Dougie, you can boot into Win98, then insert the WinXP CD-ROM and upgrade
that way, as Colin suggested. Or you can boot from the WinXP CD and choose
to upgrade; this way, the Win98 drivers (which WinXP cannot use) never get
loaded and don't have to be migrated to the WinXP version. (I've never
actually done a Win98-WinXP upgrade, so this advice is based on theory, not
on my own experience.)

RC
--
R. C. White, CPA
San Marcos, TX
rc@corridor.net
Microsoft Windows MVP

"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:O9fjzgAHFHA.4084@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
> "dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:42202c82$0$5186$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about
> if
>> I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98
>> before
>> xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp
>> pro
>> to recognise that I have a license for both?
>
> it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade
> of
> win98
>
> backup and data you need first...
> then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
> (you will get the option to format the drive)
>
> during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
> verification
> but win98 does not need to be installed first..
>
> believe me, i have done many upgrades
> and a clean install is the way to go...
> "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
> problems
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

philo wrote:

>
>
>
> it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade of
> win98
>


On what specific data do you base this assertion? WinXP is designed to
install and upgrade the existing operating system while simultaneously
preserving your applications and data, and translating as many
personalized settings as possible. The process is designed to be, and
normally is, quite painless.

Some people will always recommend that you perform a clean
installation, rather than upgrade over an earlier OS. For the most
part, I feel that these people, while well-meaning, are living in the
past, and are basing their recommendation on their experiences with
older operating systems.

WinXP is designed to install and upgrade the existing operating
system while simultaneously preserving your applications and data, and
translating as many personalized settings as possible. The process is
designed to be, and normally is, quite painless. That said, things
can go wrong, in a small number of cases. If your data is at all
important to you, back it up before proceeding.


> backup and data you need first...


Always a good idea. Things can go wrong, in a small number of cases.
If the data is at all important, it should be backed up before proceeding.


> then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
> (you will get the option to format the drive)
>


Again, why? The OP'd probably save a lot of time by upgrading his PC
to WinXP, rather than performing a clean installation, if he's no
hardware or software incompatibilities, and if his current OS has no
problems. Microsoft has greatly improved (over earlier versions of
Windows) WinXP's ability to smoothly upgrade an earlier OS.



> during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
> verification
> but win98 does not need to be installed first..
>


Correct.

> believe me, i have done many upgrades
> and a clean install is the way to go...
> "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
> problems
>


Only if one hasn't properly prepared the system for the upgrade, or if
there are underlying hardware and/or software incompatibilities.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

In news:g67121p2u9517fsf1vcsmsiemc9qkruie0@4ax.com,
JT <nomail@ever.com> typed:

> "dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some
>> info
>> about if I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely
>> reinstall win98 before xp pro or can i simply copy a few files
>> across from win 98 to allow xp pro to recognise that I have a
>> license for both?
>>
>> thanks
>
> You have several practical (although perhaps not strictly
> legal)
> options when using the XP Pro upgrade disk.
>
> 1) A true upgrade to your Win 98 computer in which case you
> simply
> stick in the XP Pro upgrade disk and proceed. Not advised.


Not advised by you, but advised by many of us.
Unlike with previous versions of Windows, an upgrade to XP
replaces almost everything, and usually works very well.



My recommendation is to at least try the upgrade, since it's much
easier than a clean installation. You can always change your mind
and reinstall cleanly if problems develop.



However, don't assume that doing an upgrade relieves you of the
need to backup your data, etc. before beginning. Before starting
to upgrade, it's always prudent to recognize that things like a
sudden power loss can occur in the middle of it and cause the
loss of everything. For that reason you should make sure you have
backups and anything else you need to reinstall if the worst
happens.


--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

That is always an option after the OP tries an upgrade. He can always
convert to NTFS afterwards.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:O9fjzgAHFHA.4084@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
> "dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:42202c82$0$5186$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about
> if
>> I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98
>> before
>> xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp
>> pro
>> to recognise that I have a license for both?
>>
>
>
> it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade
> of
> win98
>
> backup and data you need first...
> then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
> (you will get the option to format the drive)
>
> during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
> verification
> but win98 does not need to be installed first..
>
> believe me, i have done many upgrades
> and a clean install is the way to go...
> "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
> problems
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

He cannot do a clean install if his XP is an upgrade edition and his Win98
was preinstalled or he does not have a retail cd to use during the
installation. Just saying do a clean install without checking his
preparation could cause the OP to not have a functioning computer anymore.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:O9fjzgAHFHA.4084@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
> "dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:42202c82$0$5186$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about
> if
>> I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98
>> before
>> xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp
>> pro
>> to recognise that I have a license for both?
>>
>
>
> it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade
> of
> win98
>
> backup and data you need first...
> then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
> (you will get the option to format the drive)
>
> during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
> verification
> but win98 does not need to be installed first..
>
> believe me, i have done many upgrades
> and a clean install is the way to go...
> "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
> problems
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

dougie,
I did not see it mentioned yet, but you should go to Microsoft's
compatibility page, and make sure that your PC is capable of handling XP.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/evaluation/sysreqs.mspx

1. I would recommend that you have 512 MB of RAM on your PC, for XP.
2. Either way you chose to upgrade, clean install or upgrade over present
OS, make sure that you back up all your important data, such as email
messages and other data files. Just in case things go wrong.
3. You should check all your hardwares' manufacturer sites and make sure
that there is an upgrade drivers for XP. Such as printers, scanners, modems,
digital cameras, network equipment, etc... If they don't have the XP
drivers, sometimes Win2000 drivers may work, if available.

--

Add MS to your News Reader: news://msnews.microsoft.com
Rich/rerat

(RRR News) <message rule>
<<Previous Text Snipped to Save Bandwidth When Appropriate>>
>
> "dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:42202c82$0$5186$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about
> if
>> I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98
>> before
>> xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp
>> pro
>> to recognise that I have a license for both?
>
> it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade
> of
> win98
>
> backup and data you need first...
> then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
> (you will get the option to format the drive)
>
> during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
> verification
> but win98 does not need to be installed first..
>
> believe me, i have done many upgrades
> and a clean install is the way to go...
> "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
> problems
 

Philo

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
465
0
18,780
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"R. C. White" <rc@corridor.net> wrote in message
news:%238dhekBHFHA.3200@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi, Philo.
>
> > it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace"
upgrade
> > of
> > win98
>
> An upgrade from one version of Windows (Win98) to another (WinXP) is an
> "upgrade", but not an "in-place upgrade".
>
> An "in-place upgrade" is what we might call an upgrade from one version
> (WinXP) to the same version (WinXP). See KB article 315341 for
instructions
> for doing this.
> How to perform an in-place upgrade (reinstallation) of Windows XP
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q315341
>
> We frequently recommend an in-place upgrade when a user needs to reinstall
> WinXP without destroying the existing Registry. The Registry is contained
> in several files within the \Windows folder. It holds a lot of critical
> information about the existing WinXP installation, including entries for
all
> the installed applications, users, etc. A "clean install" erases the
> existing Registry and creates a new, empty one, with none of that history
or
> other information. A reformat, of course, would do that and much more.
But
> an in-place upgrade will reinstall WinXP itself while leaving most of the
> Registry intact, preserving the installed applications and data, plus most
> of the user's "tweaks". The in-place upgrade reinstalls the version that
is
> on the WinXP CD-ROM used, so a visit to Windows Update is urged -as soon
as
> the proper protection (firewall, antivirus, etc.) are in place - to be
sure
> that SP2 and any later updates are (re)installed.
>
> > and a clean install is the way to go...
> > "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
> > problems
>
> I agree with this (if we delete "inplace"). While many (most?) users have
> success with an upgrade from Win98 to WinXP, others report - as you said -
> that the "migration" of drivers and applications is less than 100%
> successful. Many upgraders experience nagging minor hassles later and end
> up doing a clean install after all. As you said, an upgrade from Win98 to
> WinXP requires only that the Win98 CD be inserted momentarily to verify
that
> the upgrade is permissible.
>
> Dougie, you can boot into Win98, then insert the WinXP CD-ROM and upgrade
> that way, as Colin suggested. Or you can boot from the WinXP CD and
choose
> to upgrade; this way, the Win98 drivers (which WinXP cannot use) never get
> loaded and don't have to be migrated to the WinXP version. (I've never
> actually done a Win98-WinXP upgrade, so this advice is based on theory,
not
> on my own experience.)
>
thank you for the clarification

at any rate, i have performed many XP installs
and upgrading an existing win98 installation
is just plain looking for trouble
 

Philo

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
465
0
18,780
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"Bruce Chambers" <bruce_a_chambers@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:evevosBHFHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> philo wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace"
upgrade of
> > win98
> >
>
>
> On what specific data do you base this assertion? WinXP is designed to
> install and upgrade the existing operating system while simultaneously
> preserving your applications and data, and translating as many
> personalized settings as possible. The process is designed to be, and
> normally is, quite painless.
>
> Some people will always recommend that you perform a clean
> installation, rather than upgrade over an earlier OS. For the most
> part, I feel that these people, while well-meaning, are living in the
> past, and are basing their recommendation on their experiences with
> older operating systems.
>
> WinXP is designed to install and upgrade the existing operating
> system while simultaneously preserving your applications and data, and
> translating as many personalized settings as possible. The process is
> designed to be, and normally is, quite painless. That said, things
> can go wrong, in a small number of cases. If your data is at all
> important to you, back it up before proceeding.
>
>
> > backup and data you need first...
>
>
> Always a good idea. Things can go wrong, in a small number of cases.
> If the data is at all important, it should be backed up before proceeding.
>
>
> > then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
> > (you will get the option to format the drive)
> >
>
>
> Again, why? The OP'd probably save a lot of time by upgrading his PC
> to WinXP, rather than performing a clean installation, if he's no
> hardware or software incompatibilities, and if his current OS has no
> problems. Microsoft has greatly improved (over earlier versions of
> Windows) WinXP's ability to smoothly upgrade an earlier OS.
>
>
>
> > during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
> > verification
> > but win98 does not need to be installed first..
> >
>
>
> Correct.
>
> > believe me, i have done many upgrades
> > and a clean install is the way to go...
> > "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
> > problems
> >
>
>
> Only if one hasn't properly prepared the system for the upgrade, or if
> there are underlying hardware and/or software incompatibilities.


first off...
a direct upgrade of win98 to XP *can* certainly work...
but it is less likely to.

win9x opertating systems
are quite different from NT-based operating systems
and only *rarely* would use the same drivers.
and yes, the drivers are supposed to be replaced during an upgrade...
but in actual practice there are often compromises made that leave one with
an unsatable
system

to upgrade win95 to win98 for example is quite safe

to upgrade win2k to XP is quite safe...

but it's not a good practice to attempt an upgrade from a win9x based OS to
an NT based OS
(regarless of what Microsoft has designed for)

FWIW: i have done well over 500 installations (of various operating
systems... not all microsoft)
for people over the last few years and have just wasted too much time
attempting to repair
bad upgrades!

OTOH: clean installs have worked fine virtually 100% of the time
( the ones that had problems, were typically minor and easy to fix)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

And then there is the issue of motherboard drivers as well.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"Bruce Chambers" <bruce_a_chambers@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:evevosBHFHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> philo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade
>> of
>> win98
>>
>
>
> On what specific data do you base this assertion? WinXP is designed to
> install and upgrade the existing operating system while simultaneously
> preserving your applications and data, and translating as many
> personalized settings as possible. The process is designed to be, and
> normally is, quite painless.
>
> Some people will always recommend that you perform a clean
> installation, rather than upgrade over an earlier OS. For the most part,
> I feel that these people, while well-meaning, are living in the past, and
> are basing their recommendation on their experiences with older operating
> systems.
>
> WinXP is designed to install and upgrade the existing operating
> system while simultaneously preserving your applications and data, and
> translating as many personalized settings as possible. The process is
> designed to be, and normally is, quite painless. That said, things
> can go wrong, in a small number of cases. If your data is at all
> important to you, back it up before proceeding.
>
>
>> backup and data you need first...
>
>
> Always a good idea. Things can go wrong, in a small number of cases. If
> the data is at all important, it should be backed up before proceeding.
>
>
>> then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
>> (you will get the option to format the drive)
>>
>
>
> Again, why? The OP'd probably save a lot of time by upgrading his PC to
> WinXP, rather than performing a clean installation, if he's no hardware or
> software incompatibilities, and if his current OS has no problems.
> Microsoft has greatly improved (over earlier versions of Windows) WinXP's
> ability to smoothly upgrade an earlier OS.
>
>
>
>> during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
>> verification
>> but win98 does not need to be installed first..
>>
>
>
> Correct.
>
>> believe me, i have done many upgrades
>> and a clean install is the way to go...
>> "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
>> problems
>>
>
>
> Only if one hasn't properly prepared the system for the upgrade, or if
> there are underlying hardware and/or software incompatibilities.
>
>
> --
>
> Bruce Chambers
>
> Help us help you:
> http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
> You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
> both at once. - RAH
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

I agree with Ken. Do a virus scan and remove any spyware, defrag, and then
upgrade.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"Ken Blake" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
news:uZBz93BHFHA.3312@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> In news:g67121p2u9517fsf1vcsmsiemc9qkruie0@4ax.com,
> JT <nomail@ever.com> typed:
>
>> "dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info
>>> about if I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely
>>> reinstall win98 before xp pro or can i simply copy a few files
>>> across from win 98 to allow xp pro to recognise that I have a
>>> license for both?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>
>> You have several practical (although perhaps not strictly legal)
>> options when using the XP Pro upgrade disk.
>>
>> 1) A true upgrade to your Win 98 computer in which case you simply
>> stick in the XP Pro upgrade disk and proceed. Not advised.
>
>
> Not advised by you, but advised by many of us.
> Unlike with previous versions of Windows, an upgrade to XP replaces almost
> everything, and usually works very well.
>
>
>
> My recommendation is to at least try the upgrade, since it's much easier
> than a clean installation. You can always change your mind and reinstall
> cleanly if problems develop.
>
>
>
> However, don't assume that doing an upgrade relieves you of the need to
> backup your data, etc. before beginning. Before starting to upgrade, it's
> always prudent to recognize that things like a sudden power loss can occur
> in the middle of it and cause the loss of everything. For that reason you
> should make sure you have backups and anything else you need to reinstall
> if the worst happens.
>
>
> --
> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
> Please reply to the newsgroup
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

It depends on whether motherboard drivers are available to the OP on a cd.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:ucW0iLCHFHA.2740@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
> "R. C. White" <rc@corridor.net> wrote in message
> news:%238dhekBHFHA.3200@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> Hi, Philo.
>>
>> > it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace"
> upgrade
>> > of
>> > win98
>>
>> An upgrade from one version of Windows (Win98) to another (WinXP) is an
>> "upgrade", but not an "in-place upgrade".
>>
>> An "in-place upgrade" is what we might call an upgrade from one version
>> (WinXP) to the same version (WinXP). See KB article 315341 for
> instructions
>> for doing this.
>> How to perform an in-place upgrade (reinstallation) of Windows XP
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q315341
>>
>> We frequently recommend an in-place upgrade when a user needs to
>> reinstall
>> WinXP without destroying the existing Registry. The Registry is
>> contained
>> in several files within the \Windows folder. It holds a lot of critical
>> information about the existing WinXP installation, including entries for
> all
>> the installed applications, users, etc. A "clean install" erases the
>> existing Registry and creates a new, empty one, with none of that history
> or
>> other information. A reformat, of course, would do that and much more.
> But
>> an in-place upgrade will reinstall WinXP itself while leaving most of the
>> Registry intact, preserving the installed applications and data, plus
>> most
>> of the user's "tweaks". The in-place upgrade reinstalls the version that
> is
>> on the WinXP CD-ROM used, so a visit to Windows Update is urged -as soon
> as
>> the proper protection (firewall, antivirus, etc.) are in place - to be
> sure
>> that SP2 and any later updates are (re)installed.
>>
>> > and a clean install is the way to go...
>> > "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
>> > problems
>>
>> I agree with this (if we delete "inplace"). While many (most?) users
>> have
>> success with an upgrade from Win98 to WinXP, others report - as you
>> said -
>> that the "migration" of drivers and applications is less than 100%
>> successful. Many upgraders experience nagging minor hassles later and
>> end
>> up doing a clean install after all. As you said, an upgrade from Win98
>> to
>> WinXP requires only that the Win98 CD be inserted momentarily to verify
> that
>> the upgrade is permissible.
>>
>> Dougie, you can boot into Win98, then insert the WinXP CD-ROM and upgrade
>> that way, as Colin suggested. Or you can boot from the WinXP CD and
> choose
>> to upgrade; this way, the Win98 drivers (which WinXP cannot use) never
>> get
>> loaded and don't have to be migrated to the WinXP version. (I've never
>> actually done a Win98-WinXP upgrade, so this advice is based on theory,
> not
>> on my own experience.)
>>
> thank you for the clarification
>
> at any rate, i have performed many XP installs
> and upgrading an existing win98 installation
> is just plain looking for trouble
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Or insert the cd and run the upgrade advisor from the splash screen.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"RRR_News" <rrr_news@isp.com> wrote in message
news:uQ17F0BHFHA.1172@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> dougie,
> I did not see it mentioned yet, but you should go to Microsoft's
> compatibility page, and make sure that your PC is capable of handling XP.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/evaluation/sysreqs.mspx
>
> 1. I would recommend that you have 512 MB of RAM on your PC, for XP.
> 2. Either way you chose to upgrade, clean install or upgrade over present
> OS, make sure that you back up all your important data, such as email
> messages and other data files. Just in case things go wrong.
> 3. You should check all your hardwares' manufacturer sites and make sure
> that there is an upgrade drivers for XP. Such as printers, scanners,
> modems,
> digital cameras, network equipment, etc... If they don't have the XP
> drivers, sometimes Win2000 drivers may work, if available.
>
> --
>
> Add MS to your News Reader: news://msnews.microsoft.com
> Rich/rerat
>
> (RRR News) <message rule>
> <<Previous Text Snipped to Save Bandwidth When Appropriate>>
>>
>> "dougie" <queanbeyan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:42202c82$0$5186$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have xp pro upgrade package from win 98 and would like some info about
>> if
>>> I need to reformat my hdd - do i need to completely reinstall win98
>>> before
>>> xp pro or can i simply copy a few files across from win 98 to allow xp
>>> pro
>>> to recognise that I have a license for both?
>>
>> it's best to do a clean install of XP rather than do an "inplace" upgrade
>> of
>> win98
>>
>> backup and data you need first...
>> then bootup with the XP cd and do a clean install
>> (you will get the option to format the drive)
>>
>> during the install, you will need to insert your win98 cd for product
>> verification
>> but win98 does not need to be installed first..
>>
>> believe me, i have done many upgrades
>> and a clean install is the way to go...
>> "inplace" upgrades of win9x , though they can work...often tend to have
>> problems
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

philo wrote:


>
> first off...
> a direct upgrade of win98 to XP *can* certainly work...
> but it is less likely to.
>

Again, what documentation or evidence can you provide to support this
claim? *Why* is it less likely to work? Nothing you've said below even
applies.


> win9x opertating systems
> are quite different from NT-based operating systems


Obviously.


> and only *rarely* would use the same drivers.


That should read "never..."


> and yes, the drivers are supposed to be replaced during an upgrade...


Not only "supposed to be," but have to be, if the device is to work
under the new operating system. WinXP won't even attempt to use the
Win9x device drivers, even if the files do remain on the hard drive.
The worst problem the Win9x drivers can cause is a the waste of a small
amount of hard drive space.


> but in actual practice there are often compromises made that leave one with
> an unsatable
> system
>


"Unsatable?" Does an upgrade somehow make the computer hungry? (And
the correct word would be "insatiable.") If you mean "unstable," this
would occur only if the original OS were problematic to start with, if
other installed applications were incompatible with the new OS, or if
the hardware platform were incompatible, defective, or sub-standard.


> to upgrade win95 to win98 for example is quite safe
>


Assuming there are no problems with the original OS, that all of the
Win95 device drivers were compatible with Win98 (which was often not the
case, if memory serves), other installed applications were compatible
with the new OS, and if the hardware platform is compatible,
non-defective, and not sub-standard, and there is no malware installed.


> to upgrade win2k to XP is quite safe...
>


Again, assuming there are no problems with the original OS, that all of
the Win2K device drivers were compatible with WinXP (or were replaced by
WinXP-specific drivers), other installed applications were compatible
with the new OS, and if the hardware platform is compatible,
non-defective, and not sub-standard, and there is no malware installed.

Do you notice a trend, yet? Any upgrade can be problem-free, if the
underlying hardware is fully compatible with the new OS, if the existing
applications are fully compatible, and if the computer user properly
prepares and plans for the upgrade. Conversely, any upgrade over a
problematic OS, onto incompatible, defective, or sub-standard hardware
is likely to fail.


> but it's not a good practice to attempt an upgrade from a win9x based OS to
> an NT based OS


Again, can you produce any industry white-papers to this affect? On
what do you base your opinion?


>
> FWIW: i have done well over 500 installations (of various operating
> systems... not all microsoft)


Relevance? What percentage of these were properly prepared and
performed upgrades? What percentage were ill-prepared and poorly
performed upgrades? What, specifically, went "wrong" in the majority of
cases? What single common factor applies universally, to lead you to
summarily conclude that all upgrades are "bad?"


> for people over the last few years and have just wasted too much time
> attempting to repair
> bad upgrades!
>

Well, obviously, an improperly performed upgrade can cause problems.
But how many properly executed upgrades have caused problems, though?




--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:eEEGeSCHFHA.2276@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
> "Bruce Chambers" <bruce_a_chambers@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
> news:evevosBHFHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > philo wrote:
[snip]
>
> FWIW: i have done well over 500 installations (of various operating
> systems... not all microsoft)
> for people over the last few years and have just wasted too much time
> attempting to repair
> bad upgrades!
>
> OTOH: clean installs have worked fine virtually 100% of the time
> ( the ones that had problems, were typically minor and easy to fix)
>


check here for instructions on how to be more successful with your upgrades
http://www.webtree.ca/windowsxp/upgrade_tips.htm

--

Harry Ohrn MS-MVP [Shell/User]
www.webtree.ca/windowsxp
 

Philo

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
465
0
18,780
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"Bruce Chambers" <bruce_a_chambers@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23JkgX8DHFHA.2420@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> philo wrote:
>
>
> >
> > first off...
> > a direct upgrade of win98 to XP *can* certainly work...
> > but it is less likely to.
> >
>
> Again, what documentation or evidence can you provide to support this
> claim? *Why* is it less likely to work? Nothing you've said below even
> applies.
>
>
> > win9x opertating systems
> > are quite different from NT-based operating systems
>
>
> Obviously.
>
>
> > and only *rarely* would use the same drivers.
>
>
> That should read "never..."
>
>
Nope, i once could not find an XP or win2k driver for a modem...
and tried a win98 driver...it worked fine.
Note: that was a one time only experience!

> > and yes, the drivers are supposed to be replaced during an upgrade...
>
>
> Not only "supposed to be," but have to be, if the device is to work
> under the new operating system. WinXP won't even attempt to use the
> Win9x device drivers, even if the files do remain on the hard drive.
> The worst problem the Win9x drivers can cause is a the waste of a small
> amount of hard drive space.
>
>
> > but in actual practice there are often compromises made that leave one
with
> > an unsatable
> > system
> >
>
>
> "Unsatable?" Does an upgrade somehow make the computer hungry? (And
> the correct word would be "insatiable.") If you mean "unstable," this
> would occur only if the original OS were problematic to start with, if
> other installed applications were incompatible with the new OS, or if
> the hardware platform were incompatible, defective, or sub-standard.
>
>
you know darn well that's a typo. *unstable*

> > to upgrade win95 to win98 for example is quite safe
> >
>
>
> Assuming there are no problems with the original OS, that all of the
> Win95 device drivers were compatible with Win98 (which was often not the
> case, if memory serves), other installed applications were compatible
> with the new OS, and if the hardware platform is compatible,
> non-defective, and not sub-standard, and there is no malware installed.
>
>
> > to upgrade win2k to XP is quite safe...
> >
>
>
> Again, assuming there are no problems with the original OS, that all of
> the Win2K device drivers were compatible with WinXP (or were replaced by
> WinXP-specific drivers), other installed applications were compatible
> with the new OS, and if the hardware platform is compatible,
> non-defective, and not sub-standard, and there is no malware installed.
>
> Do you notice a trend, yet? Any upgrade can be problem-free, if the
> underlying hardware is fully compatible with the new OS, if the existing
> applications are fully compatible, and if the computer user properly
> prepares and plans for the upgrade. Conversely, any upgrade over a
> problematic OS, onto incompatible, defective, or sub-standard hardware
> is likely to fail.
>
>
> > but it's not a good practice to attempt an upgrade from a win9x based OS
to
> > an NT based OS
>
>
> Again, can you produce any industry white-papers to this affect? On
> what do you base your opinion?
>

> >
> > FWIW: i have done well over 500 installations (of various operating
> > systems... not all microsoft)
>
>
> Relevance? What percentage of these were properly prepared and
> performed upgrades? What percentage were ill-prepared and poorly
> performed upgrades? What, specifically, went "wrong" in the majority of
> cases? What single common factor applies universally, to lead you to
> summarily conclude that all upgrades are "bad?"
>

Note: none of my statements have been an opinion. I have emperical results
for
anything I have posted. If I've ever posted on usenet something that I have
not personally
tested I've said so. Now, to answer your question...I did not want to imply
that I've attempted 500
upgrades of win98 to XP...I just wanted to say that I have a lot of
experience with installing operating systems in general...and of the many
installs i've performed...maybe only 50 involved an upgrade of win98 to XP.

The first time I did it (my own system)...I thought...well why not just take
the easy route and just directly
upgrade the win98 to XP? I checked compatability and uninstalled one app
that was questionable...
then did the upgrade. It all was quite simple and painless and seemed to all
go well. *However*
even though the win98(se) installation had been working well ...my XP
experience was not a good one. There were occasional crashes and subtle
system instabilites
which led me to question whether or not XP was really as good as I was told.
Anyway...since I has already backed up my data, I decided to just do a fresh
install , then reinstall all the same apps...That was two years ago or so
and my XP installation
has been rock stable.

Anyway...since i am an experimentor by nature...I have done perhaps 20 or so
direct upgrades of win98 to XP on either test machines...or for other
people...and found
approx half of them to be less than desirable . Although for the most part,
the upgrade
did work...the system was not as stable as it was after I formatted the
drive and just did a clean
install. After that, I decided to just stick to clean installs and have had
virtually no problems since.
That's why I always recommend a clean install.

Additionally: How likely is it that the win98 installtion is 100 % trouble
free?
Doing a fresh install of XP pretty much eliminates that unknown.
Also, with a clean install, the drive is formatted again...and if there were
any drive problems...
that should also be taken care of.

Plus, it turns out that to do a completely fresh installation really does
not take all that long...
even including re-installing the apps.

I still recall the time I had spent over 4 hours trying to rid someone's
machine that was plagued
with viruses...And ending up just formatting the drive and reinstalling
their apps...all
within 90 minutes!


for more reading see this:
http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/windowsxp_sg_9xupgrade.asp

Note: on google, if you look for problems upgrading from Win98 to XP
you will get thousands of hits. Most of the experts advise to perform a
clean install.
 

Philo

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
465
0
18,780
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"Harry Ohrn" <harry---@webtree.ca> wrote in message
news:%23XLVQVEHFHA.3628@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> "philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:eEEGeSCHFHA.2276@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "Bruce Chambers" <bruce_a_chambers@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:evevosBHFHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > philo wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > FWIW: i have done well over 500 installations (of various operating
> > systems... not all microsoft)
> > for people over the last few years and have just wasted too much time
> > attempting to repair
> > bad upgrades!
> >
> > OTOH: clean installs have worked fine virtually 100% of the time
> > ( the ones that had problems, were typically minor and easy to fix)
> >
>
>
> check here for instructions on how to be more successful with your
upgrades
> http://www.webtree.ca/windowsxp/upgrade_tips.htm
>


I assure you I've read and followed advice even more stringent that listed
on that site!
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

I'll just bet you have.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:uSuj3jEHFHA.3416@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
> "Harry Ohrn" <harry---@webtree.ca> wrote in message
> news:%23XLVQVEHFHA.3628@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> "philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:eEEGeSCHFHA.2276@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> >
>> > "Bruce Chambers" <bruce_a_chambers@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:evevosBHFHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> > > philo wrote:
>> [snip]
>> >
>> > FWIW: i have done well over 500 installations (of various operating
>> > systems... not all microsoft)
>> > for people over the last few years and have just wasted too much time
>> > attempting to repair
>> > bad upgrades!
>> >
>> > OTOH: clean installs have worked fine virtually 100% of the time
>> > ( the ones that had problems, were typically minor and easy to fix)
>> >
>>
>>
>> check here for instructions on how to be more successful with your
> upgrades
>> http://www.webtree.ca/windowsxp/upgrade_tips.htm
>>
>
>
> I assure you I've read and followed advice even more stringent that listed
> on that site!
>
>
 

Philo

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
465
0
18,780
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

"Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst(nojunk)@msn.com> wrote in message
news:uVyjMwEHFHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> I'll just bet you have.
>
>
yes,
before i did the first upgrade i had done a lot of reading.
from the time XP first came out...until I actually took the plunge...was
about 6 months.
no i did not spend the entire time reading...but I did do a lot of it.

Now that said...how many upgrades have you performed?
have the systems you've upgraded *ever* crashed?

I'd like to hear your results.

If you have done a lot of upgrades...
and they have all worked 100% then all I can say is...that's great...
but it does not always work out that way.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Hundreds and no crashes. I simply prepared well first and did not attempt
upgrades to any systems that were not certified by the manufacturer's for
XP. I also ran the Upgrade Advisor and resolved issues before attempting to
proceed. All were straightforward retail cd upgrades. I got the same
results from upgrading Win 2000 Pro systems to XP Pro.

--
Colin Barnhorst [MVP Windows - Virtual Machine]
(Reply to the group only unless otherwise requested)
"philo" <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:%23Nyzw5EHFHA.2136@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>
> "Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst(nojunk)@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:uVyjMwEHFHA.3376@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> I'll just bet you have.
>>
>>
> yes,
> before i did the first upgrade i had done a lot of reading.
> from the time XP first came out...until I actually took the plunge...was
> about 6 months.
> no i did not spend the entire time reading...but I did do a lot of it.
>
> Now that said...how many upgrades have you performed?
> have the systems you've upgraded *ever* crashed?
>
> I'd like to hear your results.
>
> If you have done a lot of upgrades...
> and they have all worked 100% then all I can say is...that's great...
> but it does not always work out that way.
>
>