Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Advice for AGP 9800 Pro upgrade

Advice for AGP 9800 Pro upgrade

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Advice for AGP 9800 Pro upgrade

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

I'm trying to decide whether it's worth upgrading my current GPU. I'm not interested in a full upgrade at the moment, so I want to know how much better performance, if any, I can get for a ~$150 investment into, say, a 7600GS.

My gaming right now is mostly Civ4 (which is somewhat unstable on my current setup), but I'd like to be able to tackle Oblivion and NWN2.

I'm also worried that an upgrade will force me to upgrade my PSU, as well.

Current setup:

Asus A8V Deluxe 939
Athlon 64 3000 single-core
Seasonic Super Silencer 300 (80%+ efficiency)
Audigy 2ZS Platinum
Compro VideoMate TV/FM card
2 SATA HDD's, 7000RPM
Bunch of USB things
9800 Pro + Arctic Silencer

(You can see why I'm not looking at a full upgrade, because I'd need to upgrade almost everything on this list).

I'm looking at the Gigabyte 7600GS because I'm led to believe by other posts here and elsewhere that my mobo isn't very happy with Radeon GPU's. Also, I'm assuming that Gigabyte's fanless setup is not only silent, but also draws less power (no extra fan to power).

However, the AGP platform analysis article seems to hint that the 9700 Pro was reasonably competitive. In fact, for Oblivion it scores 13.2 vs. the 7800GS's 20.0, which the article states is "relatively close." How "close" in real terms is that? Is the difference even less when talking about a 9800Pro vs. 7600GS?

In short, what do I get if I buy a 7600GS? More stability? Much better graphics? Somewhat better graphics? No noticeable difference at all?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

For around $150, you should be looking at these...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814143046
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814161064
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814150210
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814131036
The X1650XT and 7600GT are pretty equal in performance with a slight edge going to the 7800GS.

and for a bit more, this $199 X1950pro can't be beat.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 814131035R

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

Quote :

I want to know how much better performance, if any, I can get for a ~$150 investment into, say, a 7600GS.



For $150 you can do better than a 7600GS

Quote :

I'm led to believe by other posts here and elsewhere that my mobo isn't very happy with Radeon GPU's.


I wouldn't worry about that. Either ATI or Nvidia cards will be fine.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

Will one of these cards make Oblivion playable? Somewhat enjoyable, even?

Will I need to upgrade my PSU?

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

The X1650XT is the best AGP Oblivion card for $150. Like kaotao said, pretty equal to a 7600GT, but it's ahead in Oblivion.

For $150 AR, go with this one. Only thing in AGP that will beat it is a X1950 pro for $200.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814161064

300W PSU though, ouch. Better check the amps of the 12v rail.

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

Yes. The X1950pro would be good for Oblivion. Compared to what you have now, it'd be much more playable with anyone of those cards. ATI cards seem to do better with Oblivion than Nvidia though.

You're most likely going to have to upgrade your PSU. Definitely for the X1950pro which recomends a 450W PSU with 30a on the 12v rail.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

Power consumption:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/v [...] 0xt_4.html

Oblivion results:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/v [...] xt_14.html

I'd assume no 300W will be enough for the X1650XT either.

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

Thanks, Pauldh and kaokao!

I've never given real thought to PSU's, so how do I "check the rails"? The only number I've ever seen in Everest is something like 11.xx? on the 12V rail, I have no idea what that means and no idea how to get Amps, either.

Help?

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

Thanks for that link to the power consumption charts, Pauldh. I'm glad to know the information is out there.

As someone who tries to conserve power, this entire thing is giving me pause... I especially don't like knowing that a GPU upgrade will cause my idling power consumption to go up, since... isn't that the point of idling? Anyway, lots of good info to chew on. Thanks, forum residentz!!!! :)

EDIT: I looked up the power consumption of the 9800 Pro on that same site... looks like ALL of the cards you point to use less power than the one I've got running now. Of course, there's the ecological damage of buying a new card to begin with... but... must... play... Oblivion...! :twisted:

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

Here's another link I think you'll find useful.

http://forumz.tomshardware.com/har [...] 98276.html

Reply to kaotao

the problem with the 9800 is that it has much older technology and will probably get raped if you want oblivion to look good. Get the 7600 or the 7800

Reply to eviltwin17
- 0 +

If you're already running a 9800 Pro, power wise going to an X800 series line will easily stay in your power handling zone and give you literally twice the performance the 9800 Pro does.

I have a 9800 Pro and an X850 Pro, you'll be amazed at the difference in performance between the two.

Reply to 4ryan6

The x1950 pro won't help him much with that CPU. If he upgrades his CPU, then the x1950 pro will be SCREAMING.

If he want's to upgrade his video card only, probably go with the 7600GT, or 7800 GS.

Reply to bjmarler
- 0 +

No, even with his current CPU, the X1950pro will make a HUGE difference.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

luv the PSU calculator, it's fun and gives the illusion of precision :). It recommended under 300 W. But one thing I hadn't realized is that PSU's lose power capacity over time. Mine is > 2 yrs old? Oy.

Thanks everyone!

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

Glad to help. :)

Reply to kaotao

itll be a huge difference, yes, but the card will be quite handicapped. that was demonstrated in the toms hardware review of older agp systems. with a low processor, you can get pretty close performance with a lower card.

however though, if you're stuck on a 300 watt PSU, you ain't going nowhere. when i first upgraded my old compy from a 9600pro to an x800xl i had a 400 watt power supply. that lasted a few months before the PSU died and fried the card. i also had 2 hard drives, 2 optical drives, a tv tuner, and power hungry p4, but i think that its a lesson worth passing on.

if you're gonna upgrade the GPU, upgrade your PSU too. a good 500 watt unit can easily be had for $100 and it will give you some peace of mind.

Reply to pottymonster
- 0 +

ouch that 3000+ is the worst part. at only 1.8 ghz. Try OC it to 2.1ghz and get yourself a at x800gt. newegg has open boxed ones for $75. I ran mine on a 250w PSU. GL!

Reply to tekzor
- 0 +

An A64 3000+ @ stock 1.8GHz has more gaming power than a P4 3.2 C or E, or a XP3200+. It would perform closer to Cleeve's 3400+ (part 2) than to his XP2500+ (part 1).
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/0 [...] age10.html

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

Quote :

An A64 3000+ @ stock 1.8GHz has more gaming power than a P4 3.2 C or E, or a XP3200+. It would perform closer to Cleeve's 3400+ (part 2) than to his XP2500+ (part 1).
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/0 [...] age10.html



hes not using a 1950 card :)

x800gt+3000@2.1ghz will give better fps then 1.8ghz

Reply to tekzor
- 0 +

Quote :

An A64 3000+ @ stock 1.8GHz has more gaming power than a P4 3.2 C or E, or a XP3200+. It would perform closer to Cleeve's 3400+ (part 2) than to his XP2500+ (part 1).
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/0 [...] age10.html



hes not using a 1950 card :)

x800gt+3000@2.1ghz will give better fps then 1.8ghz
? Say what? That makes no sense. He isn't using a X800GT either, and really they are not a very good buy now anyway. Not to mention it would be the Oblivion bottleneck big time even with a 1.8GHz A64.

A X1650XT and a 1.8GHz A64 @ 1.8GHz will easily beat a X800GT and any CPU. He's talking Oblivion, why recommend he OC his CPU and go with a card that can't do HDR in a game that is extremely GPU intensive outside?

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

Hey all, I love being the "client" here and getting all of your professional advice :)

Castigate me all you want, but ultimately I went for the Gigabyte 6600GS because (1) it was a few bucks cheaper; (2) it uses a lot less energy; and (3) I don't want to feel back chucking it later.

I might just wait another 1 year or so before really playing Oblivion to the max... I made the decision long ago never to be on the cutting edge, I'm now realizing I can't even afford being in the big middle!

Anyway, a real upgrade would take me to a completely different socket, so I'd have to scrap my mobo and CPU. My system is 2 yrs old and I budgeted/planned for it to last at least 3.

Gaming is the devil's work, anyway :evil:

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

Quote :

The x1950 pro won't help him much with that CPU. If he upgrades his CPU, then the x1950 pro will be SCREAMING.



That is incorrect. Any Athlon64 will see a colossal boost with an X1950 PRO.

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

Quote :

I went for the Gigabyte 6600GS



Ew. If you wanted a cheapOblivion card, an X700 would have been ALOT better than a 6600 GS...

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

Doh! I thought you wanted to upgrade.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

Quote :

Doh! I thought you wanted to upgrade.


Uh oh. Are you saying that the 6600GS isn't even better than a 9800 Pro? I guess that was the question I led off with... Argh.

Except for that first AGP card analysis, I haven't been able to compare apples with oranges -- the 9800 Pro is such an old card that the VGA charts don't allow me to compare results.

Some d00d on the Newegg reviews claimed he had Oblivion running with this card... I'll cross my fingers?

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

Newegg reviews suck. That is not an upgrade.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

Oh no, a 6600 was not a good choice; you downgraded. Cancel the order if you still can.

For $100 you could have a X1650 pro with GDDR3 memory: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814102057

It would be a real upgrade and a pretty decent Oblivion card on the cheap. It also uses less power than the X1650XT.

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

Quote :


Some d00d on the Newegg reviews claimed he had Oblivion running with this card... I'll cross my fingers?



Oh, you can run it. But you can also run it on a 9800 PRO, probably a bit better than it will on a plain jane 6600...

Actually, the Oblivion engine favors Ati cards so much, it might run better on a 9800 PRO than even a 6600 GT...

Did you mean 6800 GS? Because I don't think there is a 6600 GS...

Reply to Cleeve
- 0 +

Quote :

Oh no, a 6600 was not a good choice. Cancel the order if you still can. For $100 you could have a X1650 pro with GDDR3 memory: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814102057

It would be a real upgrade and a pretty decent Oblivion card on the cheap.



Agreed. For the love of all that is good and decent, cancel the order man.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

I fear he/she meant this card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814143056

I don't see any 6800GS AGP's on Newegg.

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

That's exactly what I thought. I couldn't find any 6800GS' on newegg.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

8O so sad it's almost funny. Kinda like "upgrading" from a GF4ti4600 to an FX5200. :roll:

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

Quote :

8O so sad it's almost funny. Kinda like "upgrading" from a GF4ti4600 to an FX5200. :roll:



Well ya, getting newer model is often confused with getting better performances.....

Reply to fatcat
- 0 +

typo ! typo!

Gigabyte 7600GS

:oops:

I'm glad I'm at least amusing you :) mock the n00b! :) :)

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

Quote :

8O so sad it's almost funny. Kinda like "upgrading" from a GF4ti4600 to an FX5200. :roll:



Well ya, getting newer model is often confused with getting better performances.....
The good ole 5200>4600 so it must be better logic. We have had many laughs about that in the past.

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

Man, what a difference between "6" and "7". Anyway, I have the Gigabyte 7600GS on order, I know it'll raise hell in my box (passive cooling) tho to be honest I'm kinda looking forward to finding out how well the heatsink works and how good the ventilation turns out to be in there (Antec SLK3700 BQE). I also made use of the one-time $15 rebate from PayPal, which more than compensated for shipping.

Quote :

The good ole 5200>4600 so it must be better logic


... tho in this case, "7" is definitely better than "6", it seems!

Jeez, one typo and you look like a complete moron! Now that I've corrected myself, maybe I'm just a half-wit?

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

Quote :

typo ! typo!

Gigabyte 7600GS

:oops:

I'm glad I'm at least amusing you :) mock the n00b! :) :)


:wink: Oh, No, not mocking you. I hate seeing anyone get ripped off. Especially anyone smart enough to look for help before buying. But going 9800 pro to GF6600 is kinda amusing in a smack-your-head(while muttering "why do we bother" ) kind of way.

But 7600GS is alot better so I don't feel bad for ya. Oblivion is not it's strong point, and the X1650 pro would have been better and cheaper. But otherwise it's a decent card(pretty much equal to X1650 pro) that uses very little power. I have one myself in the system we use most because of the silent cooler and low power consumption/heat. Granted, in my system (total non-gamer but runs all the time in out family room), it's overkill even. An old AIW 128 pro has been serving well up to the 7600GS upgrade.

Reply to pauldh
- 0 +

Thanks, Pauldh

Quote :

I hate seeing anyone get ripped off. Especially anyone smart enough to look for help before buying.


I've been shopping this choice for, like, 4 months now so I'm not going in completely uninformed. The problem with all the charts and graphs is, as I explained, that nothing out there compares MY card with the NEW card. I have to make guesses. For example, for a while I thought the X800 was the same as the 9800, so when doing a GPU comparison I thought to myself, this 9800's pretty good! Then I read the first AGP article which made the 9700 Pro sound viable, so I kept think, this is pretty good!

Anyway, the problem with having 2-3 year cycles is that it becomes impossible to do a "how much better is this?" comparison, unless a kind forum denizen or five help straighten you out :)

Reply to pamewan
- 0 +

Quote :

typo ! typo!

Gigabyte 7600GS

:oops:

I'm glad I'm at least amusing you :) mock the n00b! :) :)



Ok that's more like it. Like Pauldh said, the x1650pro would have been a little better for Oblivion, but still not a bad choice. :)

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

Hey, my 7600GS is in a SLK3700 also, but it's an older bronze model. I like those cases. Mine was built to be quiet as the system it replaced was hot and loud. It has a Nexus power supply and Nexus low RPM fan in it, so It's quieter than stock but also moving less air. Anyway, I tested the rig and that passive 7600GS could loop 3dmarks for 30 minutes without any issues. Like I said it's not a gaming system so that was the extent of my gpu stress testing. But I think you will be fine.

This is the heatsink on mine:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814150170

Reply to pauldh

Sorry to post on the OP's thread but I have the same question. I'm looking to upgrade my ATI Radeon Pro 128mb and would like some advice. Here is my system...

AMD XP Barton 2500+ (locked and currently am not OC'ing)
Abit NF7-S v2
1 Gb PC3200 DDR Ram (2x 512)
Antec Truepower 430w PSU
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb
Antec Super Lanboy case

I recently purchased Vanguard however it runs like a dog on my system. I have to run it with the lowest settings and it doesn't look very good which is why I'm hoping a modest upgrade in the video card and possibly an additional 1 Gb of RAM will help me.

From what I've read in this thread and Tom's article of newer video cards running on older AGP systems, it seems my choices are GeForce 7600GS 512mb, GeForce 7600GT 256mb, GeForce 7800GS 256mb, ATI X1650XT 256mb, or ATI X1950Pro 256/512mb. I don't want to spend much more than $200 however I do want to get the best bang for my buck. What is confusing me are the specs between each as I don't know what is considered to be better, eg. more video RAM, more pixel pipelines, faster memory, etc.

Thanks for your help!

Reply to Gooter74
- 0 +

In that price range you should be looking at the cards I recomended on page 1 of this thread...



If you decide to go with the lesser 7600GS, don't bother with spending the extra money for the 512MB version, as it will only amount to maybe a couple more FPS.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

If you decide on going with the X1950pro, you're going to have to get a new PSU as yours only has 20amps on the 12v rail. It's recomended you have a 450W PSU with 30amps on the 12v rail. Your current PSU should be fine for the other cards listed.

Reply to kaotao

Quote :

In that price range you should be looking at the cards I recomended on page 1 of this thread...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814143046
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814161064
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814150210
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814131036
The X1650XT and 7600GT are pretty equal in performance with a slight edge going to the 7800GS.

and for a bit more, this $199 X1950pro can't be beat.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 814131035R



If you decide to go with the lesser 7600GS, don't bother with spending the extra money for the 512MB version, as it will only amount to maybe a couple more FPS.

Ok, I'll take the x1950Pro out of the equation but I'm still confused as to why one of the remaining 4 are better than the others. The 7800GS/256 is better than the X1650XT/256 and 7600GT/256?

Thanks

Reply to Gooter74
- 0 +

They're all pretty close performance wise. If it were me, I'd go for the X1650XT.

Reply to kaotao
- 0 +

Unlock the darn thing and convert it to a 9800xt. At that point it won't be too far behind a 7600gs ot x1650 pro. You might find some new life in the thing. Until it cooks, you can postpone the jump to a new board.

Reply to s4fun
- 0 +

Quote :

AMD XP Barton 2500+ (locked and currently am not OC'ing)
Abit NF7-S v2


Not OC'in an XP2500+ on an NF7 rev 2.0? Are you aware that is a crime around here? :wink:

I actually have an NF7 Rev 2 and an NF7-S rev 2, both with mobile XP2500+. One does 2.4GHz and one does 2.6GHz, but I run the 2.4GHz one at stock XP2500+ speeds because it's in a quiet HTPC. Stinks yours is a locked chip, but it should still be able to run 2.2GHz (11*200) either at stock voltage or a slight boost to 1.7v. Anyway, that combo of yours is built to OC. Pair it at 2.2GHz with a new GPU and you'll see quite a boost over what you are running now.

I just purchased the His X1650XT IceQ Turbo to replace a 9800 pro myself in the HTPC. IMO, although it trades blows with the 7600GT and 7800GS, it's the best card of the three. My upgrade was for Oblivion, so it was an easy choice (not to mention I'm a sucker for the iceQ cooling solution), which my 9800 pro also had on it.

Anyway, I agree with Kaotao, all three about equal, but my buck would go (and did just go) toward the X1650XT for $150 AR. Link:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814161064

I'm not sure about which of the three takes your game though so you may want to check into that before deciding. Chances are the X1950 pro would win reguardless, but if it's an NV favoring game, the 7600GT/7800GS may beat the X1650XT. If it's a game like Oblivion or NFS:Carbon, the X1650XT would win.

Reply to pauldh

Well, I'm not very technical savy when it comes to OC'ing so I never bothered trying. However, I think I will try so I can squeeze some more power out of my system before having to upgrade. I'll have to post a separate thread on how to OC. :)

Reply to Gooter74
- 0 +

Just pay a visit to the OCing section in the forumz.

Reply to kaotao
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Advice for AGP 9800 Pro upgrade
Go to:

There are 705 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them