Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

3DMark06 Score Post Them Here

Tags:
Last response: in CPUs
Share
February 11, 2007 7:29:18 AM

Hey post your 3DMark06 scores everyone and see how your running against other people my score is in my links below along with some other pictures as well.

Thank you in advanced


-Walker

More about : 3dmark06 score post

February 11, 2007 11:29:46 AM

No pics, but

10270 3D Marks at default settings 1280x1024
Related resources
February 11, 2007 2:37:57 PM



not bad for a single 7900GS
February 11, 2007 8:17:54 PM

it's 4431 :/ 

February 12, 2007 9:37:26 AM

Ah don't worry about it, you've made me feel better anyway that there's someone else with a normal system as opposed to one of these uber-rigs (I'm not bitter.... honest :p )
a b à CPUs
February 12, 2007 10:27:08 AM

Wow, yet again another e-penis measuring contest :roll: . It just sucks that I can't measure up, and I still come to prove it.

Here it is:

My Pathetic Score

Now that the shame is over with, we really need to get beyond this.
February 12, 2007 11:10:44 AM

Quote:
Wow, yet again another e-penis measuring contest :roll: . It just sucks that I can't measure up, and I still come to prove it.

Here it is:

My Pathetic Score

Now that the shame is over with, we really need to get beyond this.


Theres nothing wrong with 6.5k. I ran +-5k wth my old pentium d 7600 rig, maxed out both on watercooling.

Now i run 13720 w/ moderate overclock.
March 3, 2008 2:27:52 AM

Here's somethin to make all you ATi/AMD fans fairly proud.... 11,586 on my rig... I'm fairly pleezed

BTW the 3870 crossfire setup is berry nice, berry nice indeed. Crysis at high everything but shaders @ 1680x1050... Even tho COD4 looks better

edit: turned off a couple background programs n got 12073 :) 
March 3, 2008 2:42:48 AM

14,506. Default settings 1280x1024.

8800GTS 512mb at 775/1880/1050

E8400 4Ghz.

(Pre-overclock was 12310)
March 3, 2008 3:29:41 AM



Not bad for a poor little Phenom
a b à CPUs
March 3, 2008 4:03:59 AM

17,000

Pentium 100
256k ram

Who cares?
March 3, 2008 4:08:16 AM

lolz... JumpingJack was still here a year ago..

Too bad he left THGF... or it wouldn't be in its current state...
March 3, 2008 6:30:02 AM

beurling said:
14,506. Default settings 1280x1024.

8800GTS 512mb at 775/1880/1050

E8400 4Ghz.

(Pre-overclock was 12310)


Very nice... are you running XP? I wonder what I would get with XP.
March 3, 2008 6:32:57 AM


How do ya like them apples... not much to brag about. I would like 20+ on same hardware. I am waiting for new GPU coolers... but not sure if I want to go much higher with E8400 as I've heard it breaks down and you never achieve the volts you had before at 4.0ghz.
March 3, 2008 7:34:37 AM

this thread started 02-11-2007...hehe
March 3, 2008 7:41:37 AM

7000+ is good for now. My 8800 GT muscles me through games with good frame rate's and I'm playing at 1680x1050. I will upgrade system when a good video card is just not cutting it and my apps become slow, but my system is still smooth as silk.




" alt="" class="imgLz frmImg " />
a b à CPUs
March 3, 2008 8:20:14 AM

13,117

1280 x 1024
Default settings

8800GTS 640 660/1535/935
Q6600 @3.6Ghz
March 3, 2008 8:40:17 AM

16,280 default settings 1280x1024

1x 8800GTX at 756/1782/2160 (1.36v)
q6600 at 3.74GHz 416*9 (1.438v)
Vista 32bit Ultimate
EK Waterblocks
BlackIce 360GTX Rad
laing D5 Vario pump

Suicide run at 4.22GHz and GTX at 801/1839/2214 17,830 with ONE 8800GTX
March 3, 2008 8:40:48 AM

March 3, 2008 9:26:05 AM

steffato said:
16,280 default settings 1280x1024

1x 8800GTX at 756/1782/2160 (1.36v)
q6600 at 3.74GHz 416*9 (1.438v)
Vista 32bit Ultimate
EK Waterblocks
BlackIce 360GTX Rad
laing D5 Vario pump

Suicide run at 4.22GHz and GTX at 801/1839/2214 17,830 with ONE 8800GTX


Hay did you volt mod your 8800GTX? And hows it you know what your GPU voltage is? If I wanted to OC my E6600 to 3.8 I could but that would require over 1.56 volts to do it, I am still sane though. :D 


By systemlord at 2007-12-10
March 3, 2008 10:16:32 AM

steffato said:
16,280 default settings 1280x1024

1x 8800GTX at 756/1782/2160 (1.36v)
q6600 at 3.74GHz 416*9 (1.438v)
Vista 32bit Ultimate
EK Waterblocks
BlackIce 360GTX Rad
laing D5 Vario pump

Suicide run at 4.22GHz and GTX at 801/1839/2214 17,830 with ONE 8800GTX

Utter madness!! I think you could call that a commendable effort! :lol: 
I doubt i'll even get close to that with my system (I am adding another GTX tonight) using SLi'd GTXs!
March 3, 2008 10:28:14 AM

Yup, I have voltmoded it. It is an A2 revision and requires a bit more voltage than A3 revisions. All GTX are supposed to run at 1.30volts stock and Ultra's at 1.35V. Memory voltage is supposed to be at 1.95volts. Mine though was 1.28v at idle and 1.23 at load. Now it is 1.39v idle and 1.36v load. You can find guides all over the net on how to do it. The voltage then is measured at another point on the PCB. My memory was at 1.91 and I raised its voltage to 1.95 exactly. Mine has Samsung 1ns chips and they don't gain anything over 1.95v. Just heat. However, if your board has Hynix chips it can benefit from even higher voltage. Whatever you do, don't mess with Vdroop mods. The same applies to your motherboard. There is an Intel paper describing exactly what Vdrrop is supposed to do and you shouldn't mess with it.

Last point, don't raise your GTX voltage without proper cooling. Stock nVidia cooler is not suitable.
March 3, 2008 11:24:08 AM

omg epeen 3dmark06 scores!!!!!!!
March 3, 2008 12:09:06 PM

8800GTX in SLI and 8800GTX Single scores listed below:

17,759..., and 15,782

March 3, 2008 2:17:36 PM

March 3, 2008 2:30:22 PM

hughyhunter said:
Very nice... are you running XP? I wonder what I would get with XP.


Running Vista 64 (See sig)
March 3, 2008 4:29:42 PM

steffato said:
16,280 default settings 1280x1024

1x 8800GTX at 756/1782/2160 (1.36v)
q6600 at 3.74GHz 416*9 (1.438v)
Vista 32bit Ultimate
EK Waterblocks
BlackIce 360GTX Rad
laing D5 Vario pump

Suicide run at 4.22GHz and GTX at 801/1839/2214 17,830 with ONE 8800GTX


beurling said:
Running Vista 64 (See sig)


Very good scores!
March 3, 2008 5:17:05 PM

Vista64 Ultimate
Stock settings Q6600/8800GTX

3dmark score - 11227

SM 2.0 score - 4628
SM 3.0 score - 4950
CPU Score - 3319
a c 123 à CPUs
March 3, 2008 5:38:50 PM

grieve said:
Vista64 Ultimate
Stock settings Q6600/8800GTX

3dmark score - 11227

SM 2.0 score - 4628
SM 3.0 score - 4950
CPU Score - 3319



I get the same with a stock Q6600 and a HD2900Pro 1GB. Mine was 11400 max under Vista Premium 32bit. Need to OC the card. Have the Q6600 OC'ed to 3GHz but haven't tested it yet.
March 3, 2008 6:05:49 PM

jimmysmitty said:
I get the same with a stock Q6600 and a HD2900Pro 1GB. Mine was 11400 max under Vista Premium 32bit. Need to OC the card. Have the Q6600 OC'ed to 3GHz but haven't tested it yet.


your getting 11400, stock settings, vista and a HD2900Pro 1GB??? Seems kinda odd you would be higher then my 8800GTX.

March 3, 2008 6:23:20 PM

3Dmark 06' (free version) score: 12,670

e6550 @ 3.15GHz 1800FSB
evga 8800gt 512 @ 700/1000
2gigs Crucial Ballistics 5,5,5,15 DDR2-800 @ DDR2-900


not too shabby for what i'm workin with! :sol: 
March 3, 2008 6:27:26 PM

grieve said:
Vista64 Ultimate
Stock settings Q6600/8800GTX

3dmark score - 11227

SM 2.0 score - 4628
SM 3.0 score - 4950
CPU Score - 3319

This does seem a tad bit low to me... you should go to task manager and end all processes under username and then try running it again. This may give you a few hundred points more.

What is your memory timings set at? Auto or manually set?

He does have a 1GB card... that might make up for the difference. He may have a stock overclocked one too.
March 3, 2008 7:12:15 PM

It isnt low, it is in the top 200,000 out of 3million for similar machines (average). If i OC the processor to only 2.7 i get around 11,900
March 3, 2008 7:17:15 PM

killing all Apps gains like 30 points and the memory timmings are cas4 but dont know the rest off the top of my head as i am @ work.
a c 123 à CPUs
March 3, 2008 7:33:52 PM

grieve said:
your getting 11400, stock settings, vista and a HD2900Pro 1GB??? Seems kinda odd you would be higher then my 8800GTX.


Thats what I have woundered. But the memory probably helps and its GDDR4 so its a bit speedier.

hughyhunter said:
This does seem a tad bit low to me... you should go to task manager and end all processes under username and then try running it again. This may give you a few hundred points more.

What is your memory timings set at? Auto or manually set?

He does have a 1GB card... that might make up for the difference. He may have a stock overclocked one too.


I might try that and OC and disable SpeedStep and C1E cuz the way 3DMark06 goes I think it runs my CPU at 2GHz instead of the full all out 3GHz. I have my memory at cas5 but might try for cas4. Just got it stable @ 3GHz a few weeks ago with a 1:1 FSB/memory ratio.

People never believe that I can play Crysis @ 1280x1024 at very high but I can. I usually lower shadows and water since they dont matter. Crysis is a video memory hungry due to the large textures at that quality so extra video memory cuts some FPS lag by being able to load more.
March 3, 2008 7:35:50 PM

The bottom line is he is getting 400 more points about because his card is probably overclocked from the factory, has 1GB of memory and he probably has a better mobo for bandwidth and that's why he score's a little better. Everybody scores differently. I score a few hundred points below people that have the same hardware and o'c that I do... it's just because they are doing things a bit more right than I am.
Tweak your bios and o'c then come back and share your adventures. I'm interested to see if you guys with the Q6600 and 8800 series cards can get close to steffato but on air! :bounce: 
March 3, 2008 7:37:06 PM

13686

E6600 @ 3.4 ghz
XFX 8800 GT @ 702 / 1020
2GB Kingston DDR-2 667
- turned off desktop icons, shutdown any programs running
also disabled a few services, disabled internet...
March 3, 2008 7:37:30 PM

12,500

(3.6GHz cpu o/c 8800GT standard)
a c 123 à CPUs
March 3, 2008 8:48:53 PM

hughyhunter said:
The bottom line is he is getting 400 more points about because his card is probably overclocked from the factory, has 1GB of memory and he probably has a better mobo for bandwidth and that's why he score's a little better. Everybody scores differently. I score a few hundred points below people that have the same hardware and o'c that I do... it's just because they are doing things a bit more right than I am.
Tweak your bios and o'c then come back and share your adventures. I'm interested to see if you guys with the Q6600 and 8800 series cards can get close to steffato but on air! :bounce: 


Actually thats the card at stock 600/1850(925) which is the stock for the Sapphire Radeon HD2900Pro 1GB's. I have an P5K-E WiFi/AP and Intel chipsets have mostly been known to have better bandwidth especially memory than NVidias.

I did a little tweaking just now since I got home (was at work) and tried again. Turned off SpeedStep and C1E also set my memory timings to cas4 so they are 4-4-4-12(considering I have the same memory as the Corsair PC2-6400 but higher voltage for PC2-8500) and OC'ed my card using AMDGPUTool to 800/2200(1100). My score was 12320 3DMarks so almost 1k more.

Here is a link for some proofage:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5556544

Makes me happy :bounce:  that I can keep up with the 8800 series and helps me acknowledge that this was a good buy especially since I only paid $219 for it. I got it right before I finalized my purcahse and was going with a HD2900XT 1GB for $400 then I saw this right as it popped up.

I think the HD2900Pro/XT series has potential just needs the drivers to go with it. I am tempted to flash it with a HD2900XT BIOS or even a stable custom BIOS but am a little antsy. I still think the 512bit memory bus is very underused by the drivers cuz I remember going from 128bit to 256bit and I was never able to go back to 128bit. So maybe after a few more driver revisions they will be taking more advantage of the memory bus and we will see more improvements.
March 3, 2008 9:47:40 PM

when I do a very small OC to 2.7GHZ i get the following:
Q6600/8800GTX Vista64 Ultimate

3DMark Score - 11954 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score - 4909 Marks
SM 3.0 Score - 5115 Marks
CPU Score - 3793 Marks

a c 123 à CPUs
March 3, 2008 9:53:22 PM

grieve said:
when I do a very small OC to 2.7GHZ i get the following:
Q6600/8800GTX Vista64 Ultimate

3DMark Score - 11954 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score - 4909 Marks
SM 3.0 Score - 5115 Marks
CPU Score - 3793 Marks


Thats not bad. Try 3GHz and see if it pushes above mine. I noticed your SM 2.0 is better than mine but my SM 3.0 is better than yous. My CPU score is a little less than 500 more than yours. More than likely due to the OC and maybe your RAM timings. What are they set at BTW?

I understand why you would wounder how I could keep up with your machine especially since you paid quite a bit for that GTX so it should perform good.

But for the OC on the CPU if it is a G0 you shouldn't have to raise the CPU voltage at all to hit 3GHz stable. I have mine set at 1.25 and it runs at 1.224 when it is under load and at 3GHz.

Try that and let us know what happens.
March 4, 2008 1:10:57 AM

My rig before this one was:

4600+ x2
4X512GB pc3200
EVGA 8800GT

I tried everything to score over 10k with that rig. I was around 9980 in 3Dmark06. I had the cpu overclock to 2.94ghz, 8800GT set to 730/1000 (never was quite able to get it that high after that day) and still couldnt get it above that score. I would wait a few hours and bump it up to 3ghz and higher memory on the gpu and it wouldnt pass the benchmark. I wish I could still mess with that thing.
!