Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > X2 6000 review? Benchmarks?

X2 6000 review? Benchmarks?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - X2 6000 review? Benchmarks?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

has anyone seen anything on this?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Quote :

has anyone seen anything on this?



It should be about 7-10% faster than FX62.

Reply to BaronMatrix

And still not as fast as a Core 2

Reply to mesarectifier

Quote :

And still not as fast as a Core 2



I'm sure the thread would do without you mentioning that.

Reply to BaronMatrix

Quote :

And still not as fast as a Core 2


Doesnt matter if its priced competatively. If its cheap enough, then it will be the better value, if not C2D will.

Reply to turpit

if it is so, then won't the question be about future compatibility, I mean about future upgrades... etc :roll:

Reply to zarooch

Quote :

if it is so, then won't the question be about future compatibility, I mean about future upgrades... etc :roll:



That will be one of several questions. At the rate CPU advancement and price drops are proceeding right now, socket upgradabilty may fall in relevance over the coming 18 months. If you can get both a new mobo and CPU at an attractive price, while still making use of all other existing hardware, then the question (in part) becomes one of willingness to reload the OS/software.

Reply to turpit

Quote :

has anyone seen anything on this?



On the TomsHardware "Price/Performance" charts is should score almost exactly at 2.0 or so for a performance index

This makes it about 3% faster than an E6600 ($331) and about 6% slower than an E6700 ($518)

I would thus expect this to be about a $399 or so part based upon it's performance.

Reply to the_vorlon

Quote :

has anyone seen anything on this?



It should be about 7-10% faster than FX62.

Really? I was thinking around 5% tops, as it's only 7% quicker in pure clockspeed, and most applications don't scale linearly with clockspeed. How you estimated up to 10% from a 7% clockspeed bump is beyond me, maybe AMD put some banned performance enhancing drugs into these chips. :wink: :lol:

Reply to epsilon84

Quote :


Really? I was thinking around 5% tops, as it's only 7% quicker in pure clockspeed, and most applications don't scale linearly with clockspeed. How you estimated up to 10% from a 7% clockspeed bump is beyond me, maybe AMD put some banned performance enhancing drugs into these chips. :wink: :lol:


It should scale worse than expected because the memory divider should cause it to run DDR2-800 at ~750MHz.

Reply to accord99

Quote :

has anyone seen anything on this?

It'll be fast enough.....that's all you need to know. Right Baron? :D

Reply to 1Tanker

Quote :

has anyone seen anything on this?

It'll be fast enough.....that's all you need to know. Right Baron? :D

But wait, theres more! If you compare it to an AMD processor you bought 2 years ago, it's MUCH FASTER, and that is ALL THAT MATTERS... to Baron... :wink:

Reply to epsilon84
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > X2 6000 review? Benchmarks?
Go to:

There are 749 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them