Archived from groups: microsoft.public.security,alt.os.security,microsoft.public.win2000.security,comp.security,comp.security.misc (More info?)
I'm working for a company that is considering purchasing GFI Languard
PSC. I would like to hear experiences (positive and negative) from users
who have used this product.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.security,alt.os.security,microsoft.public.win2000.security,comp.security,comp.security.misc (More info?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Clarke,
Although I liked the fancy interface, and the ability to link to
BugTraq or CERT when a vulnerability was detected, I don't think that
LanGuard lives up to even nmap (http://insecure.org/nmap/), due to
one simple reason: LanGuard produces false results. This is quite a
problem. As I was helping to secure a friend's server, LanGuard could
not be convinced that POP3 wasn't running on the server. It wasn't.
In the end, even though we had our shiny new LanGuard, we ended up
using trusty nmap. If you really want a GUI, you can always use
NmapFE (nmap Front End).
Hope that helps some,
- - ds
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.