Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.security (More info?)
I have a remote machine running 2003 Server. The only access I have with
this machine is through Terminal services via the internet. It has two
network interfaces with 5 IP addresses (.80, .82, .83) and (.81, .84). I
have opened port 3389 on both interfaces. However I only have access on .83:
The others are all blocked by ICS.
When I look at the PfFirewall log for blocked accesses it looks like the
terminal services client are using a random external port with an internal
port of 3389. The external port being blocked Example of log entries:
2005-03-06 10:16:43 DROP TCP x.x.x.173 x.x.x.81 1318 3389 48 S 715726595 0
65535 - - -
2005-03-06 10:19:05 DROP TCP x.x.x.173 x.x.x.80 1329 3389 48 S 3884051858 0
65535 - - -
2005-03-06 10:35:57 DROP TCP x.x.x.173 x.x.x.82 1373 3389 48 S 714900859 0
65535 - - -
specific IP addresses removed out for security reasons.
What is actually going on and how can I fix this so the terminal services
client can access the server from all ip addresses rather than just the .83
IP address?
> I have a remote machine running 2003 Server. The only access I have with
> this machine is through Terminal services via the internet. It has two
> network interfaces with 5 IP addresses (.80, .82, .83) and (.81, .84). I
> have opened port 3389 on both interfaces. However I only have access on .83:
> The others are all blocked by ICS.
>
> When I look at the PfFirewall log for blocked accesses it looks like the
> terminal services client are using a random external port with an internal
> port of 3389. The external port being blocked Example of log entries:
>
> 2005-03-06 10:16:43 DROP TCP x.x.x.173 x.x.x.81 1318 3389 48 S 715726595 0
> 65535 - - -
>
> 2005-03-06 10:19:05 DROP TCP x.x.x.173 x.x.x.80 1329 3389 48 S 3884051858 0
> 65535 - - -
>
> 2005-03-06 10:35:57 DROP TCP x.x.x.173 x.x.x.82 1373 3389 48 S 714900859 0
> 65535 - - -
>
> specific IP addresses removed out for security reasons.
>
> What is actually going on and how can I fix this so the terminal services
> client can access the server from all ip addresses rather than just the .83
> IP address?
>
>
> --
> Mark Turner
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.