Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > CPU Scaling with 8800 GTS & GTX

CPU Scaling with 8800 GTS & GTX

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - CPU Scaling with 8800 GTS & GTX

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
duffsr   02-19-2007 at 08:57:26 PM

http://legionhardware.com/document.php?id=618

Very interesting comparison of the 8800 GTS and GTX when paired with everything from a 3800 X2 to a 3.3GHz C2D.

All tests done at 1600x1200 16AA 16AF. Some games show No CPU dependance whatsoever.

I found it interesting. Enjoy.

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
mpjesse   02-19-2007 at 09:16:46 PM
- 0 +

Indeed... just goes to show it's the game that matters and not the CPU. The whole "you need a bad ass CPU for a 8800 GTX" myth is definitely debunked. It's all about the game.

Reply to mpjesse
krisz   02-19-2007 at 09:57:16 PM
- 0 +

That's good news definitely.

Reply to krisz
prozac26   02-19-2007 at 09:58:26 PM
- 0 +

Quote :

Indeed... just goes to show it's the game that matters and not the CPU. The whole "you need a bad ass CPU for a 8800 GTX" myth is definitely debunked. It's all about the game.


Some people still have thick skulls though....

Reply to prozac26
duffsr   02-19-2007 at 10:48:02 PM
- 0 +

Also amazing how well the GTS fairs at 1600x1200 with 16AA and 16AF. Thats well beyond the scope of where most computer users, most gamers even. Of course these are current games only, non-dx10, and this is the 640mb version of the GTS.

I always enjoy these type of comparisons that show how real-world combinations will handle various hardware. Probably not easy to put together.

Reply to duffsr
Xazax310   02-19-2007 at 11:10:27 PM
- 0 +

Well, its nice to see SOMEONE do an article right. Not just "show casing" off only Core 2 duo's on the 8800's series but using even AMD's low end Dual cores.

Reply to Xazax310
krisz   02-20-2007 at 12:18:20 AM
- 0 +

Quote :

Well, its nice to see SOMEONE do an article right. Not just "show casing" off only Core 2 duo's on the 8800's series but using even AMD's low end Dual cores.


My thoughts exactly. :)

Reply to krisz
Dr_asik   02-20-2007 at 01:24:04 AM
- 0 +

Well, when they're on to prove how relevant CPUs are in terms of gaming performance, they bench at 800x600, and now for this test they run absolute graphical torture with crazy levels of AA, AF and resolution.

Most people will find that their computer "sweet spot" in terms of performance, where neither the CPU or the GPU is acting as a bottleneck, is somewhere around 1024x768 - 1280x1024 with modest levels of AA and AF.

So, ok, cool test, but practically what does it mean?

Reply to Dr_asik
duffsr   02-20-2007 at 02:45:29 AM
- 0 +

Quote :

Well, when they're on to prove how relevant CPUs are in terms of gaming performance, they bench at 800x600, and now for this test they run absolute graphical torture with crazy levels of AA, AF and resolution.

Most people will find that their computer "sweet spot" in terms of performance, where neither the CPU or the GPU is acting as a bottleneck, is somewhere around 1024x768 - 1280x1024 with modest levels of AA and AF.

So, ok, cool test, but practically what does it mean?



What it practically means is that the compromise is gone. I don't have to wonder how much I need to get what I considerable fps with my setup. I can see the difference between my OCd 4800+ and a a C2D with a GTS and GTX.

Basically, it tells me my 22" 1680x1050 (~10% less pixels then 16x12) will play everything fine with 16aa and 16af with a GTS. I'm going for one of the 320MB overclocked evga's from newegg for $299.

Really i believe this to be the most relavent tests with practical uses I've seen ever.

Reply to duffsr
zoltric   02-20-2007 at 11:06:07 AM
- 0 +

why would you pay 300 for a 320mb card. when you can get the 640 gts for 369 after 30$ rebate.. do your homework :-). 70 dollars more gets you a much better card. Plus you never go for the first inexpensive model they release after the big dogs. for the simple fact it was probably not well thought out and just released to satisfy the needs of people who want a dx10 card with the most recent release of vista.

Reply to zoltric
rosu9801   02-20-2007 at 11:34:51 AM
- 0 +

The overclocked 320MB cards seem to out perform the non-clocked 640MB cards in resolutions under 19x12 =).

Guru3d Article

Since for example my screen maxes out at 1280x1024 why should i get a 640MB card?

I myself are gonna get the XFX XXX 320MB card. =)

Reply to rosu9801
duffsr   02-20-2007 at 01:51:37 PM
- 0 +

Quote :

The overclocked 320MB cards seem to out perform the non-clocked 640MB cards in resolutions under 19x12 =).

Guru3d Article

Since for example my screen maxes out at 1280x1024 why should i get a 640MB card?

I myself are gonna get the XFX XXX 320MB card. =)



Hence, why spend $60+ more, have to deal with crappy rebates, not be overclocked with warranty, and get beat for less than 300?

Reply to duffsr
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > CPU Scaling with 8800 GTS & GTX
Go to:

There are 665 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.270 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Topics
See all relatives topics
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
How do I win badges?