Yeah I replied to this in the other thread;
CLICKY
I don't think this will be a GF8600, I think it's slated to be a GF8300-8400 more than anything. Likely won't game better than the GF7800GS or X1950P that are out there now. To me it's geared at the HTPC and OEM upgrade market.
We'll see, but I still think this is a counter-productive action and a step back from where ATi and nV want to go, and it's likely more of a PR thing to be able to say "AGP DX10" etc. But that would be like ATi crowing about the X1300 on PCI, who cares, even for servers. Heck even PCI makes more sense because of those st00pid eMachine rigs that have no AGP or PCI slot, but overall AGP should just be dropped. This is just another driver problem to add to the list of many IMO, why would you even want to intro AGP to the DX10 driver crew? Don't they have enough work?