Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 2000/NT > Windows 2000/NT General Discussion > Windows 2000 security vulnerability solution

Windows 2000 security vulnerability solution

Forum Windows 2000/NT : Windows 2000/NT General Discussion - Windows 2000 security vulnerability solution

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.security (More info?)

 

Hi,

We ran a security vulnerability test on our servers using nessus tool. We
could not find solution for several vulnerabilities that were found. I just
would like to know what would be the solution for the vulnerabilities which
we found.

1. LDAP allows anonymous binds
2. Oracle tnslsnr security Count
3. ShowCode possible Count - Windows NT box
4. SSH protocol versions supported Count
5. NFS export
6. nfsd service Count


For now, I think this should suffice. So, if you have the answer, kindly let
me know.

thanks in advance

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.security (More info?)

 

As concerns point 1., I believe you are running MS Window 2k.
Windows 2k3 comes with stricter security as to (almost) disable
anonymous binds completely.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.security (More info?)

 

Thanks barabba, but we are running 2000 boxes, and the upgrade to 2003 as of
now does not fall under our plan. So, I would like to know how to disable
these in Windows 2000 servers. I thank u again, but if you have any ideas how
to disable these in Win2K servers, please let me know.


"barabba72@hotmail.com" wrote:

> As concerns point 1., I believe you are running MS Window 2k.
> Windows 2k3 comes with stricter security as to (almost) disable
> anonymous binds completely.
>
>

Reply to Neil
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 2000/NT > Windows 2000/NT General Discussion > Windows 2000 security vulnerability solution
Go to:

There are 466 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them