Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Starting Windows 2000 hangs on new install.

Tags:
  • Windows 2000
  • Hard Drives
  • Windows
Last response: in Windows 2000/NT
Share
Anonymous
April 5, 2004 7:52:52 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
Machine spec:
AMD XP2400 processor,
Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
330w PSU,
Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
floppy or HD fine.
I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
but don't recall seeing any solution.
Please help.
Regards,
Kevin.

More about : starting windows 2000 hangs install

April 7, 2004 7:38:31 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards, extra
hardware
and or with a single DDR?

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
> hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
> completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
> Machine spec:
> AMD XP2400 processor,
> Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> 330w PSU,
> Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
> change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
> floppy or HD fine.
> I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
> but don't recall seeing any solution.
> Please help.
> Regards,
> Kevin.
>
>
Anonymous
April 19, 2004 4:09:12 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only card being the
Matrix G400 graphics card.
I've tried swapping every system component individually for a replacement -
except for the processor (expensive !). The same result every time - the
system hangs when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes. With a
fresh install, this is as far as I can get - the install hasn't completed
sufficiently to give me any 'recovery' options.
I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron 650 - and it
worked fine ! Problem with that is that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough
performance for the video editing I'm planning to do.
After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went back to the
XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I also tried installing
Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame
the processor.
Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the XP2400 which
doesn't happen with a different processor or op system ?
I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully appreciated.
Kevin.

DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards, extra
| hardware
| and or with a single DDR?
|
| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
|| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
|| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
|| Machine spec:
|| AMD XP2400 processor,
|| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|| 330w PSU,
|| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
|| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
|| floppy or HD fine.
|| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
|| but don't recall seeing any solution.
|| Please help.
|| Regards,
|| Kevin.
Related resources
April 20, 2004 12:36:59 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

If I understand correctly;
Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more hardware
'fault' tolerant)
If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu, or possibly
bios update required.
What is the mobo?

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only card being
the
> Matrix G400 graphics card.
> I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
replacement -
> except for the processor (expensive !). The same result every time - the
> system hangs when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes. With a
> fresh install, this is as far as I can get - the install hasn't completed
> sufficiently to give me any 'recovery' options.
> I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron 650 - and it
> worked fine ! Problem with that is that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough
> performance for the video editing I'm planning to do.
> After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went back to the
> XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I also tried installing
> Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame
> the processor.
> Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the XP2400 which
> doesn't happen with a different processor or op system ?
> I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully appreciated.
> Kevin.
>
> DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
> | Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards, extra
> | hardware
> | and or with a single DDR?
> |
> | "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> | news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> || I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
> || hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
> || completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
> || Machine spec:
> || AMD XP2400 processor,
> || Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> || 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> || 330w PSU,
> || Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> || The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
> || change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
> || floppy or HD fine.
> || I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
> || but don't recall seeing any solution.
> || Please help.
> || Regards,
> || Kevin.
>
>
Anonymous
April 20, 2004 1:43:59 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-7VRXP (I
have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my original post which is still
at the foot of this thread. Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB
and multiplier in the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus clock. Since
then I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB
(effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100
MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every
time - problem persists.
M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web site.
Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
Kevin.

DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
| If I understand correctly;
| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu, or
| possibly bios update required.
| What is the mobo?
|
| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only card
|| being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
| replacement -
|| except for the processor (expensive !). The same result every time -
|| the system hangs when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes.
|| With a fresh install, this is as far as I can get - the install
|| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery' options.
|| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron 650 -
|| and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the Duron 650
|| doesn't give enough performance for the video editing I'm planning
|| to do.
|| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went back to
|| the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I also tried
|| installing Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400 fine, so I'm not
|| inclined to blame the processor.
|| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the XP2400
|| which doesn't happen with a different processor or op system ?
|| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully appreciated.
|| Kevin.
||
|| DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards,
||| extra hardware
||| and or with a single DDR?
|||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
|||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
|||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
|||| Machine spec:
|||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||| 330w PSU,
|||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
|||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
|||| floppy or HD fine.
|||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
|||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||| Please help.
|||| Regards,
|||| Kevin.
April 24, 2004 3:44:49 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

Sorry missed the line about mobo;
With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg cpu.
If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to enable boot
from cd in bios) and repair.
Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
Good luck

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-7VRXP (I
> have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my original post which is
still
> at the foot of this thread. Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB
> and multiplier in the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus clock. Since
> then I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB
> (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100
> MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every
> time - problem persists.
> M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web site.
> Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
> Kevin.
>
> DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
> | If I understand correctly;
> | Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
> | With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
> | hardware 'fault' tolerant)
> | If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu, or
> | possibly bios update required.
> | What is the mobo?
> |
> | "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> | news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> || I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only card
> || being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
> || I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
> | replacement -
> || except for the processor (expensive !). The same result every time -
> || the system hangs when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes.
> || With a fresh install, this is as far as I can get - the install
> || hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery' options.
> || I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron 650 -
> || and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the Duron 650
> || doesn't give enough performance for the video editing I'm planning
> || to do.
> || After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went back to
> || the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I also tried
> || installing Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400 fine, so I'm not
> || inclined to blame the processor.
> || Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the XP2400
> || which doesn't happen with a different processor or op system ?
> || I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully appreciated.
> || Kevin.
> ||
> || DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
> ||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards,
> ||| extra hardware
> ||| and or with a single DDR?
> |||
> ||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> ||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> |||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
> |||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
> |||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
> |||| Machine spec:
> |||| AMD XP2400 processor,
> |||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> |||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> |||| 330w PSU,
> |||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> |||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
> |||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
> |||| floppy or HD fine.
> |||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
> |||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
> |||| Please help.
> |||| Regards,
> |||| Kevin.
>
>
Anonymous
April 24, 2004 2:08:17 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

DL <> wrote:
| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and multiplier
switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz and it still works fine.
Solid processor, that Duron.
| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes properly so
they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card' drivers. I have now tried
installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess what ? - no change.
| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg cpu.
I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the settings forcing the
correct FSB and multiplier. I've even tried underclocking the XP2400 a bit.
Still no change - works fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000
startup.
| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to enable
| boot from cd in bios) and repair.
Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after the 'Starting
Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to the Duron 650 to get that
to finish again.
| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way things are
going I might be better off using this PC as landfill and 'cover everything'
with concrete !
| Good luck
I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I could do with
some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I don't really want to have to
spend the rest of my life trying to edit video on a Duron 650.
Thanks for the help.
Kevin.

| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
|| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my original
|| post which is still at the foot of this thread. Originally I left
|| the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier in the 'auto' setting,
|| as was the memory bus clock. Since then I've tried slowing things
|| down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due
|| to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus
|| clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time - problem
|| persists.
|| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web site.
|| Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
|| Kevin.
||
|| DL <> wrote:
||| If I understand correctly;
||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
||| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu, or
||| possibly bios update required.
||| What is the mobo?
|||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only card
|||| being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|||| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
|||| replacement - except for the processor (expensive !). The same
|||| result every time - the system hangs when the 'Starting Windows'
|||| progress bar completes. With a fresh install, this is as far as I
|||| can get - the install
|||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery' options.
|||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron 650 -
|||| and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the Duron 650
|||| doesn't give enough performance for the video editing I'm planning
|||| to do.
|||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went back
|||| to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I also
|||| tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400 fine, so
|||| I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
|||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the
|||| XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor or op
|||| system ?
|||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully appreciated.
|||| Kevin.
||||
|||| DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards,
||||| extra hardware
||||| and or with a single DDR?
|||||
||||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
|||||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
|||||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
|||||| Machine spec:
|||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||||| 330w PSU,
|||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
|||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
|||||| floppy or HD fine.
|||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
|||||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||||| Please help.
|||||| Regards,
|||||| Kevin.
April 25, 2004 12:48:27 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one I had
trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem, even using OTT
coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!

When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being correctly
identified

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> DL <> wrote:
> | Sorry missed the line about mobo;
> No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
> | With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
> Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and multiplier
> switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz and it still works
fine.
> Solid processor, that Duron.
> | Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
> Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes properly so
> they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card' drivers. I have now tried
> installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess what ? - no change.
> | Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg cpu.
> I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the settings forcing
the
> correct FSB and multiplier. I've even tried underclocking the XP2400 a
bit.
> Still no change - works fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000
> startup.
> | If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to enable
> | boot from cd in bios) and repair.
> Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after the 'Starting
> Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to the Duron 650 to get that
> to finish again.
> | Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
> That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way things are
> going I might be better off using this PC as landfill and 'cover
everything'
> with concrete !
> | Good luck
> I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I could do
with
> some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I don't really want to have
to
> spend the rest of my life trying to edit video on a Duron 650.
> Thanks for the help.
> Kevin.
>
> | "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> | news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> || Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
> || GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my original
> || post which is still at the foot of this thread. Originally I left
> || the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier in the 'auto' setting,
> || as was the memory bus clock. Since then I've tried slowing things
> || down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due
> || to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus
> || clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time - problem
> || persists.
> || M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web site.
> || Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
> || Kevin.
> ||
> || DL <> wrote:
> ||| If I understand correctly;
> ||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
> ||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
> ||| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
> ||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu, or
> ||| possibly bios update required.
> ||| What is the mobo?
> |||
> ||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> ||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only card
> |||| being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
> |||| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
> |||| replacement - except for the processor (expensive !). The same
> |||| result every time - the system hangs when the 'Starting Windows'
> |||| progress bar completes. With a fresh install, this is as far as I
> |||| can get - the install
> |||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery' options.
> |||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron 650 -
> |||| and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the Duron 650
> |||| doesn't give enough performance for the video editing I'm planning
> |||| to do.
> |||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went back
> |||| to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I also
> |||| tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400 fine, so
> |||| I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
> |||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the
> |||| XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor or op
> |||| system ?
> |||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully appreciated.
> |||| Kevin.
> ||||
> |||| DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
> ||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards,
> ||||| extra hardware
> ||||| and or with a single DDR?
> |||||
> ||||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> ||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> |||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
> |||||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
> |||||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
> |||||| Machine spec:
> |||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
> |||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> |||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> |||||| 330w PSU,
> |||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> |||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
> |||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
> |||||| floppy or HD fine.
> |||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
> |||||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
> |||||| Please help.
> |||||| Regards,
> |||||| Kevin.
>
>
Anonymous
April 25, 2004 2:44:00 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

DL <> wrote:
| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one I had
| trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem, even using
| OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!
|
| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being
| correctly identified

Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400 correctly. In
the Windows Me installation which works with either processor (I swap HDs) I
have a few utilities which can run system identification and benchmarking -
everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't have is any
software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify it, burn it in and
benchmark it - but not fully test it, the whole works - all instructions,
caches, pipelines, everything. I think that this would have to be my next
step short of actually buying another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I
guess there isn't a special way you have to install Windows 2000 on an XP
processor because of the SSE instructions, is there ?
TIA
Kevin.

| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|| DL <> wrote:
||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
|| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
|| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and multiplier
|| switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz and it still
|| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
|| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes
|| properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card' drivers. I
|| have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess what ?
|| - no change.
||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg cpu.
|| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the settings
|| forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even tried
|| underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works fine in
|| Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to enable
||| boot from cd in bios) and repair.
|| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after the
|| 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to the Duron
|| 650 to get that to finish again.
||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
|| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way things
|| are going I might be better off using this PC as landfill and 'cover
|| everything' with concrete !
||| Good luck
|| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I could
|| do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I don't really
|| want to have to spend the rest of my life trying to edit video on a
|| Duron 650.
|| Thanks for the help.
|| Kevin.
||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
|||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my original
|||| post which is still at the foot of this thread. Originally I left
|||| the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier in the 'auto' setting,
|||| as was the memory bus clock. Since then I've tried slowing things
|||| down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due
|||| to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus
|||| clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time - problem
|||| persists.
|||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web
|||| site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
|||| Kevin.
||||
|||| DL <> wrote:
||||| If I understand correctly;
||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
||||| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu,
||||| or possibly bios update required.
||||| What is the mobo?
|||||
||||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only
|||||| card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
|||||| replacement - except for the processor (expensive !). The same
|||||| result every time - the system hangs when the 'Starting Windows'
|||||| progress bar completes. With a fresh install, this is as far as I
|||||| can get - the install
|||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery' options.
|||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron 650
|||||| - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the Duron 650
|||||| doesn't give enough performance for the video editing I'm
|||||| planning to do.
|||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went back
|||||| to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I also
|||||| tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400 fine, so
|||||| I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
|||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the
|||||| XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor or op
|||||| system ?
|||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully appreciated.
|||||| Kevin.
||||||
|||||| DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards,
||||||| extra hardware
||||||| and or with a single DDR?
|||||||
||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
|||||||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
|||||||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
|||||||| Machine spec:
|||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||||||| 330w PSU,
|||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
|||||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
|||||||| floppy or HD fine.
|||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
|||||||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||||||| Please help.
|||||||| Regards,
|||||||| Kevin.
April 25, 2004 4:57:13 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with one AMD
cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another identical cpu, gave up,
upgraded mobo and cpu.
There have been reports of the occasional problems with various hardware and
AMD, though this was some years ago, where seemingly with identical hardware
one would have a conflict and the other wouldnt.
I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this issue.

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> DL <> wrote:
> | I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one I had
> | trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem, even using
> | OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!
> |
> | When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being
> | correctly identified
>
> Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400 correctly. In
> the Windows Me installation which works with either processor (I swap HDs)
I
> have a few utilities which can run system identification and
benchmarking -
> everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't have is any
> software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify it, burn it in and
> benchmark it - but not fully test it, the whole works - all instructions,
> caches, pipelines, everything. I think that this would have to be my next
> step short of actually buying another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I
> guess there isn't a special way you have to install Windows 2000 on an XP
> processor because of the SSE instructions, is there ?
> TIA
> Kevin.
>
> | "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> | news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> || DL <> wrote:
> ||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
> || No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
> ||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
> || Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and multiplier
> || switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz and it still
> || works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
> ||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
> || Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes
> || properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card' drivers. I
> || have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess what ?
> || - no change.
> ||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg cpu.
> || I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the settings
> || forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even tried
> || underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works fine in
> || Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
> ||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to enable
> ||| boot from cd in bios) and repair.
> || Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after the
> || 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to the Duron
> || 650 to get that to finish again.
> ||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
> || That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way things
> || are going I might be better off using this PC as landfill and 'cover
> || everything' with concrete !
> ||| Good luck
> || I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I could
> || do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I don't really
> || want to have to spend the rest of my life trying to edit video on a
> || Duron 650.
> || Thanks for the help.
> || Kevin.
> ||
> ||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
> |||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my original
> |||| post which is still at the foot of this thread. Originally I left
> |||| the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier in the 'auto' setting,
> |||| as was the memory bus clock. Since then I've tried slowing things
> |||| down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due
> |||| to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus
> |||| clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time - problem
> |||| persists.
> |||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web
> |||| site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
> |||| Kevin.
> ||||
> |||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||| If I understand correctly;
> ||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
> ||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
> ||||| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
> ||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu,
> ||||| or possibly bios update required.
> ||||| What is the mobo?
> |||||
> ||||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> ||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only
> |||||| card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
> |||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
> |||||| replacement - except for the processor (expensive !). The same
> |||||| result every time - the system hangs when the 'Starting Windows'
> |||||| progress bar completes. With a fresh install, this is as far as I
> |||||| can get - the install
> |||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery' options.
> |||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron 650
> |||||| - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the Duron 650
> |||||| doesn't give enough performance for the video editing I'm
> |||||| planning to do.
> |||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went back
> |||||| to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I also
> |||||| tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400 fine, so
> |||||| I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
> |||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the
> |||||| XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor or op
> |||||| system ?
> |||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully appreciated.
> |||||| Kevin.
> ||||||
> |||||| DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
> ||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no cards,
> ||||||| extra hardware
> ||||||| and or with a single DDR?
> |||||||
> ||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> ||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> |||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
> |||||||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
> |||||||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
> |||||||| Machine spec:
> |||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
> |||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> |||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> |||||||| 330w PSU,
> |||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> |||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
> |||||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
> |||||||| floppy or HD fine.
> |||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
> |||||||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
> |||||||| Please help.
> |||||||| Regards,
> |||||||| Kevin.
>
>
Anonymous
April 25, 2004 5:28:57 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

DL <> wrote:
| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with one
| AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another identical cpu,
| gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
| There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where seemingly
| with identical hardware one would have a conflict and the other
| wouldnt.
| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this issue.

BT ? - who are they ?
I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is Windows 2000
which is going wrong and failing to provide an error message.
I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I expect will refer me to
Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore me or refer me elsewhere.
The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP m/board, AMD
XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of Windows 2000 would it
all work ?
Kevin.

| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|| DL <> wrote:
||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one I
||| had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem, even
||| using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!
|||
||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being
||| correctly identified
||
|| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
|| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with either
|| processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can run system
|| identification and
| benchmarking -
|| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't have is
|| any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify it, burn it in
|| and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the whole works - all
|| instructions, caches, pipelines, everything. I think that this would
|| have to be my next step short of actually buying another XP2400
|| (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a special way you have
|| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
|| instructions, is there ?
|| TIA
|| Kevin.
||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||| DL <> wrote:
||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
|||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
|||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
|||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz and
|||| it still
|||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
|||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes
|||| properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card' drivers.
|||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess
|||| what ? - no change.
||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg
||||| cpu.
|||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the settings
|||| forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even tried
|||| underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works fine in
|||| Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
|||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after the
|||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to the
|||| Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
|||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way things
|||| are going I might be better off using this PC as landfill and
|||| 'cover everything' with concrete !
||||| Good luck
|||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I could
|||| do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I don't really
|||| want to have to spend the rest of my life trying to edit video on a
|||| Duron 650.
|||| Thanks for the help.
|||| Kevin.
||||
||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
|||||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my
|||||| original post which is still at the foot of this thread.
|||||| Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier in
|||||| the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus clock. Since then I've
|||||| tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB
|||||| (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz
|||||| then 100 MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200).
|||||| Same result every time - problem persists.
|||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web
|||||| site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
|||||| Kevin.
||||||
|||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||| If I understand correctly;
||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
||||||| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu,
||||||| or possibly bios update required.
||||||| What is the mobo?
|||||||
||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only
|||||||| card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
|||||||| replacement - except for the processor (expensive !). The same
|||||||| result every time - the system hangs when the 'Starting
|||||||| Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh install, this is
|||||||| as far as I can get - the install
|||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
|||||||| options.
|||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron
|||||||| 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the
|||||||| Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for the video
|||||||| editing I'm
|||||||| planning to do.
|||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went
|||||||| back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I
|||||||| also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400
|||||||| fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
|||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the
|||||||| XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor or op
|||||||| system ?
|||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
|||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
||||||||
|||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no
||||||||| cards, extra hardware
||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
|||||||||
||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
|||||||||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
|||||||||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
|||||||||| Machine spec:
|||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||||||||| 330w PSU,
|||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
|||||||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
|||||||||| floppy or HD fine.
|||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
|||||||||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||||||||| Please help.
|||||||||| Regards,
|||||||||| Kevin.
April 25, 2004 1:39:03 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

BT? - your ISP is BT
I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial problem as been
with their hardware.
The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any of which
could be the problem, though its more likely to be hardware than software.
If you recently purchased mobo or cpu are you able to exchange ?

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> DL <> wrote:
> | Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with one
> | AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another identical cpu,
> | gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
> | There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
> | hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where seemingly
> | with identical hardware one would have a conflict and the other
> | wouldnt.
> | I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this issue.
>
> BT ? - who are they ?
> I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is Windows 2000
> which is going wrong and failing to provide an error message.
> I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I expect will refer me to
> Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore me or refer me elsewhere.
> The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP m/board, AMD
> XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of Windows 2000 would it
> all work ?
> Kevin.
>
> | "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> | news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> || DL <> wrote:
> ||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one I
> ||| had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem, even
> ||| using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!
> |||
> ||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being
> ||| correctly identified
> ||
> || Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
> || correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with either
> || processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can run system
> || identification and
> | benchmarking -
> || everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't have is
> || any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify it, burn it in
> || and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the whole works - all
> || instructions, caches, pipelines, everything. I think that this would
> || have to be my next step short of actually buying another XP2400
> || (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a special way you have
> || to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
> || instructions, is there ?
> || TIA
> || Kevin.
> ||
> ||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
> |||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
> ||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
> |||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
> |||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz and
> |||| it still
> |||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
> ||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
> |||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes
> |||| properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card' drivers.
> |||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess
> |||| what ? - no change.
> ||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg
> ||||| cpu.
> |||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the settings
> |||| forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even tried
> |||| underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works fine in
> |||| Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
> ||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
> ||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
> |||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after the
> |||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to the
> |||| Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
> ||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
> |||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way things
> |||| are going I might be better off using this PC as landfill and
> |||| 'cover everything' with concrete !
> ||||| Good luck
> |||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I could
> |||| do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I don't really
> |||| want to have to spend the rest of my life trying to edit video on a
> |||| Duron 650.
> |||| Thanks for the help.
> |||| Kevin.
> ||||
> ||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
> |||||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my
> |||||| original post which is still at the foot of this thread.
> |||||| Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier in
> |||||| the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus clock. Since then I've
> |||||| tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB
> |||||| (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz
> |||||| then 100 MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200).
> |||||| Same result every time - problem persists.
> |||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web
> |||||| site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
> |||||| Kevin.
> ||||||
> |||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||| If I understand correctly;
> ||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
> ||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
> ||||||| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
> ||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this cpu,
> ||||||| or possibly bios update required.
> ||||||| What is the mobo?
> |||||||
> ||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only
> |||||||| card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
> |||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
> |||||||| replacement - except for the processor (expensive !). The same
> |||||||| result every time - the system hangs when the 'Starting
> |||||||| Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh install, this is
> |||||||| as far as I can get - the install
> |||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
> |||||||| options.
> |||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron
> |||||||| 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the
> |||||||| Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for the video
> |||||||| editing I'm
> |||||||| planning to do.
> |||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went
> |||||||| back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same. I
> |||||||| also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the XP2400
> |||||||| fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
> |||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the
> |||||||| XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor or op
> |||||||| system ?
> |||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
> |||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
> ||||||||
> |||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no
> ||||||||| cards, extra hardware
> ||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
> |||||||||
> ||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> |||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
> |||||||||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
> |||||||||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
> |||||||||| Machine spec:
> |||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
> |||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> |||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> |||||||||| 330w PSU,
> |||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> |||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
> |||||||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
> |||||||||| floppy or HD fine.
> |||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
> |||||||||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
> |||||||||| Please help.
> |||||||||| Regards,
> |||||||||| Kevin.
>
>
Anonymous
April 25, 2004 2:34:40 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

DL <> wrote:
| BT? - your ISP is BT

Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to get involved with a
hardware or software problem on a machine which hasn't got as far as being
'connected' yet. It can be bad enough (and very time-consuming) trying to
get BT to help when there's a connection problem, or their DNS servers are
down. Their expensive-to-call helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of
inappropriate questions and misleading suggestions (like insisting that I
should re-install all my software and buy a new router when they have a DNS
problem !). I can imagine they'd probably have me going out buying a new
monitor, or removing the HSF to see if the XP2400 gets warm enough ! Their
support is worse than useless - the only reason I stick with them is because
it would be too much hassle if I lost this e-mail address as I use it to get
work.
I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another identical one - and
the problem was identical too. I could have a shot at trying to return the
CPU, but I'd need to show that it is faulty first. As it will merrily run
Windows Me (or several other op systems I've tried) with no problem then
that is going to be difficult. I could counter that with saying that a Duon
650 does run everything fine.
The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet is a completely
different m/board. It might just be that the combination of GA-7VRXP, XP2400
and Windows 2000 are incompatible. At the moment, I can swap the XP2400 for
a Duron 650, or swap Windows 2000 for Windows Me and get a result. What I
haven't tried is some different m/board. The main barrier with this is that
a new m/board is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
Kevin.

| I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial problem
| as been with their hardware.
| The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any of
| which could be the problem, though its more likely to be hardware
| than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu are you able to
| exchange ?
|
| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
| news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|| DL <> wrote:
||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with one
||| AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another identical cpu,
||| gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
||| There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
||| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where seemingly
||| with identical hardware one would have a conflict and the other
||| wouldnt.
||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this issue.
||
|| BT ? - who are they ?
|| I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is Windows
|| 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an error message.
|| I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I expect will refer
|| me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore me or refer me
|| elsewhere.
|| The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP
|| m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of
|| Windows 2000 would it all work ?
|| Kevin.
||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||| DL <> wrote:
||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one I
||||| had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem, even
||||| using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!
|||||
||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being
||||| correctly identified
||||
|||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
|||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with either
|||| processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can run system
|||| identification and
||| benchmarking -
|||| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't have
|||| is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify it, burn
|||| it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the whole works -
|||| all instructions, caches, pipelines, everything. I think that this
|||| would have to be my next step short of actually buying another
|||| XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a special way
|||| you have
|||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
|||| instructions, is there ?
|||| TIA
|||| Kevin.
||||
||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
|||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
|||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
|||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz and
|||||| it still
|||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
|||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes
|||||| properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card'
|||||| drivers.
|||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess
|||||| what ? - no change.
||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg
||||||| cpu.
|||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the settings
|||||| forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even tried
|||||| underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works fine in
|||||| Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
||||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
|||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after the
|||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to the
|||||| Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
|||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way
|||||| things are going I might be better off using this PC as landfill
|||||| and 'cover everything' with concrete !
||||||| Good luck
|||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I
|||||| could do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I
|||||| don't really want to have to spend the rest of my life trying to
|||||| edit video on a Duron 650.
|||||| Thanks for the help.
|||||| Kevin.
||||||
||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
|||||||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my
|||||||| original post which is still at the foot of this thread.
|||||||| Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier
|||||||| in the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus clock. Since then
|||||||| I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the
|||||||| FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166 MHz to
|||||||| 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR = 333 -> 266
|||||||| -> 200). Same result every time - problem persists.
|||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web
|||||||| site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
|||||||| Kevin.
||||||||
|||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||| If I understand correctly;
||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
||||||||| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this
||||||||| cpu, or possibly bios update required.
||||||||| What is the mobo?
|||||||||
||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only
|||||||||| card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
|||||||||| replacement - except for the processor (expensive !). The
|||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs when the 'Starting
|||||||||| Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh install, this
|||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
|||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
|||||||||| options.
|||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron
|||||||||| 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the
|||||||||| Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for the video
|||||||||| editing I'm
|||||||||| planning to do.
|||||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went
|||||||||| back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same.
|||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the
|||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
|||||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the
|||||||||| XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor or op
|||||||||| system ?
|||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
|||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
||||||||||
|||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no
||||||||||| cards, extra hardware
||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
|||||||||||
||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
|||||||||||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
|||||||||||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
|||||||||||| Machine spec:
|||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||||||||||| 330w PSU,
|||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
|||||||||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
|||||||||||| floppy or HD fine.
|||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
|||||||||||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||||||||||| Please help.
|||||||||||| Regards,
|||||||||||| Kevin.
April 25, 2004 4:05:32 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

I mention BT merely as an example of my experience with a piece of hardware
not functioning, whilst on an identical setup it was ok.
I'm trying to point out; that there are occasions when with identical setups
one will work and the other will not.
The likelyhood is that if you were able to swap out the mobo and cpu for
identical products it would be OK.
The only hope for this is if you bought at same time from same supplier

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c6g47v$clh$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> DL <> wrote:
> | BT? - your ISP is BT
>
> Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to get involved with
a
> hardware or software problem on a machine which hasn't got as far as being
> 'connected' yet. It can be bad enough (and very time-consuming) trying to
> get BT to help when there's a connection problem, or their DNS servers are
> down. Their expensive-to-call helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of
> inappropriate questions and misleading suggestions (like insisting that I
> should re-install all my software and buy a new router when they have a
DNS
> problem !). I can imagine they'd probably have me going out buying a new
> monitor, or removing the HSF to see if the XP2400 gets warm enough !
Their
> support is worse than useless - the only reason I stick with them is
because
> it would be too much hassle if I lost this e-mail address as I use it to
get
> work.
> I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another identical one -
and
> the problem was identical too. I could have a shot at trying to return the
> CPU, but I'd need to show that it is faulty first. As it will merrily run
> Windows Me (or several other op systems I've tried) with no problem then
> that is going to be difficult. I could counter that with saying that a
Duon
> 650 does run everything fine.
> The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet is a completely
> different m/board. It might just be that the combination of GA-7VRXP,
XP2400
> and Windows 2000 are incompatible. At the moment, I can swap the XP2400
for
> a Duron 650, or swap Windows 2000 for Windows Me and get a result. What I
> haven't tried is some different m/board. The main barrier with this is
that
> a new m/board is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
> I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
> Kevin.
>
> | I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial problem
> | as been with their hardware.
> | The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any of
> | which could be the problem, though its more likely to be hardware
> | than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu are you able to
> | exchange ?
> |
> | "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> | news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> || DL <> wrote:
> ||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with one
> ||| AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another identical cpu,
> ||| gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
> ||| There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
> ||| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where seemingly
> ||| with identical hardware one would have a conflict and the other
> ||| wouldnt.
> ||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this issue.
> ||
> || BT ? - who are they ?
> || I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is Windows
> || 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an error message.
> || I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I expect will refer
> || me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore me or refer me
> || elsewhere.
> || The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP
> || m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of
> || Windows 2000 would it all work ?
> || Kevin.
> ||
> ||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one I
> ||||| had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem, even
> ||||| using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!
> |||||
> ||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being
> ||||| correctly identified
> ||||
> |||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
> |||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with either
> |||| processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can run system
> |||| identification and
> ||| benchmarking -
> |||| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't have
> |||| is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify it, burn
> |||| it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the whole works -
> |||| all instructions, caches, pipelines, everything. I think that this
> |||| would have to be my next step short of actually buying another
> |||| XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a special way
> |||| you have
> |||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
> |||| instructions, is there ?
> |||| TIA
> |||| Kevin.
> ||||
> ||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
> |||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
> ||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
> |||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
> |||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz and
> |||||| it still
> |||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
> ||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
> |||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes
> |||||| properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card'
> |||||| drivers.
> |||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess
> |||||| what ? - no change.
> ||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg
> ||||||| cpu.
> |||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the settings
> |||||| forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even tried
> |||||| underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works fine in
> |||||| Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
> ||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
> ||||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
> |||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after the
> |||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to the
> |||||| Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
> ||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
> |||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way
> |||||| things are going I might be better off using this PC as landfill
> |||||| and 'cover everything' with concrete !
> ||||||| Good luck
> |||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I
> |||||| could do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I
> |||||| don't really want to have to spend the rest of my life trying to
> |||||| edit video on a Duron 650.
> |||||| Thanks for the help.
> |||||| Kevin.
> ||||||
> ||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
> |||||||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my
> |||||||| original post which is still at the foot of this thread.
> |||||||| Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier
> |||||||| in the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus clock. Since then
> |||||||| I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the
> |||||||| FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166 MHz to
> |||||||| 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR = 333 -> 266
> |||||||| -> 200). Same result every time - problem persists.
> |||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte web
> |||||||| site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing damage.
> |||||||| Kevin.
> ||||||||
> |||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||| If I understand correctly;
> ||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
> ||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly more
> ||||||||| hardware 'fault' tolerant)
> ||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this
> ||||||||| cpu, or possibly bios update required.
> ||||||||| What is the mobo?
> |||||||||
> ||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the only
> |||||||||| card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
> |||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually for a
> |||||||||| replacement - except for the processor (expensive !). The
> |||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs when the 'Starting
> |||||||||| Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh install, this
> |||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
> |||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
> |||||||||| options.
> |||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old Duron
> |||||||||| 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is that the
> |||||||||| Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for the video
> |||||||||| editing I'm
> |||||||||| planning to do.
> |||||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I went
> |||||||||| back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just the same.
> |||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the
> |||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
> |||||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with the
> |||||||||| XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor or op
> |||||||||| system ?
> |||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
> |||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
> ||||||||||
> |||||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no
> ||||||||||| cards, extra hardware
> ||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
> |||||||||||
> ||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> |||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and it
> |||||||||||| hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows' progress bar
> |||||||||||| completes. No error messages or re-boots - it just hangs.
> |||||||||||| Machine spec:
> |||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
> |||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> |||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> |||||||||||| 330w PSU,
> |||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> |||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
> |||||||||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from either
> |||||||||||| floppy or HD fine.
> |||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported before,
> |||||||||||| but don't recall seeing any solution.
> |||||||||||| Please help.
> |||||||||||| Regards,
> |||||||||||| Kevin.
>
>
Anonymous
April 25, 2004 6:41:34 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

Oh dear - no hope for me then ! :-(
All the various bits for this new PC were gradually purchased last Autumn. I
was then busy working away from home over the winter so I only got the time
to try putting everything together about 3 weeks ago.
Logically, I find it difficult to understand why one build using a set of
components might work while another build using identical components might
fail. I can accept that it might happen occasionally but, in the absence of
an actual fault somewhere, I can't understand it.
Given that all other parts have been swapped, the logical conclusion is that
the problem lies between the CPU and Windows 2000. Either the XP2400 is
unable to work in some way that only Windows 2000 (and no other op system)
requires, or Windows 2000 is trying to do something with the XP2400 (and not
with other processors) which the XP2400 should not be doing. The problem
lies in proving which one - the XP2400 or Windows 2000 - is faulty. In the
absence of decent diagnostics from Windows 2000, and comprehendsive CPU test
and diagnostic software, this is pretty much impossible.
Purchasing either another XP2400 CPU, or another copy of Windows 2000, is
not a financially viable option for me.
The one thing I think I need now is some way forward. By all accounts an
XP2400 on a GA-7VRXP should be able to run Windows 2000, so it is case of
pin-pointing the problem.
Very gratefull for all the help received so far, I'm hoping that somebody
has a good idea.
TIA
Kevin.

DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
| I mention BT merely as an example of my experience with a piece of
| hardware not functioning, whilst on an identical setup it was ok.
| I'm trying to point out; that there are occasions when with identical
| setups one will work and the other will not.
| The likelyhood is that if you were able to swap out the mobo and cpu
| for identical products it would be OK.
| The only hope for this is if you bought at same time from same
| supplier
|
| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
| news:c6g47v$clh$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
|| DL <> wrote:
||| BT? - your ISP is BT
||
|| Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to get involved
|| with a hardware or software problem on a machine which hasn't got as
|| far as being 'connected' yet. It can be bad enough (and very
|| time-consuming) trying to get BT to help when there's a connection
|| problem, or their DNS servers are down. Their expensive-to-call
|| helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of inappropriate questions and
|| misleading suggestions (like insisting that I should re-install all
|| my software and buy a new router when they have a DNS problem !). I
|| can imagine they'd probably have me going out buying a new monitor,
|| or removing the HSF to see if the XP2400 gets warm enough ! Their
|| support is worse than useless - the only reason I stick with them is
|| because it would be too much hassle if I lost this e-mail address as
|| I use it to get work.
|| I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another identical
|| one - and the problem was identical too. I could have a shot at
|| trying to return the CPU, but I'd need to show that it is faulty
|| first. As it will merrily run Windows Me (or several other op
|| systems I've tried) with no problem then that is going to be
|| difficult. I could counter that with saying that a Duon 650 does run
|| everything fine.
|| The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet is a
|| completely different m/board. It might just be that the combination
|| of GA-7VRXP, XP2400 and Windows 2000 are incompatible. At the
|| moment, I can swap the XP2400 for a Duron 650, or swap Windows 2000
|| for Windows Me and get a result. What I haven't tried is some
|| different m/board. The main barrier with this is that a new m/board
|| is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
|| I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
|| Kevin.
||
||| I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial problem
||| as been with their hardware.
||| The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any of
||| which could be the problem, though its more likely to be hardware
||| than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu are you able to
||| exchange ?
|||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
||| news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||| DL <> wrote:
||||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with
||||| one AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another
||||| identical cpu, gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
||||| There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
||||| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where seemingly
||||| with identical hardware one would have a conflict and the other
||||| wouldnt.
||||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this
||||| issue.
||||
|||| BT ? - who are they ?
|||| I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is Windows
|||| 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an error message.
|||| I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I expect will refer
|||| me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore me or refer me
|||| elsewhere.
|||| The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP
|||| m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of
|||| Windows 2000 would it all work ?
|||| Kevin.
||||
||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one
||||||| I had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem,
||||||| even using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!
|||||||
||||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being
||||||| correctly identified
||||||
|||||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
|||||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with either
|||||| processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can run
|||||| system identification and
||||| benchmarking -
|||||| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't have
|||||| is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify it, burn
|||||| it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the whole works -
|||||| all instructions, caches, pipelines, everything. I think that
|||||| this would have to be my next step short of actually buying
|||||| another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a
|||||| special way you have
|||||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
|||||| instructions, is there ?
|||||| TIA
|||||| Kevin.
||||||
||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
|||||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
||||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
|||||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
|||||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz
|||||||| and it still
|||||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
||||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
|||||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes
|||||||| properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card'
|||||||| drivers.
|||||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess
|||||||| what ? - no change.
||||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg
||||||||| cpu.
|||||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the
|||||||| settings forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even
|||||||| tried underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works
|||||||| fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
||||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
||||||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
|||||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after
|||||||| the 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to
|||||||| the Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
||||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
|||||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way
|||||||| things are going I might be better off using this PC as
|||||||| landfill and 'cover everything' with concrete !
||||||||| Good luck
|||||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I
|||||||| could do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I
|||||||| don't really want to have to spend the rest of my life trying
|||||||| to edit video on a Duron 650.
|||||||| Thanks for the help.
|||||||| Kevin.
||||||||
||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
|||||||||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my
|||||||||| original post which is still at the foot of this thread.
|||||||||| Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier
|||||||||| in the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus clock. Since
|||||||||| then I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz
|||||||||| on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166
|||||||||| MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR =
|||||||||| 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time - problem
|||||||||| persists.
|||||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte
|||||||||| web site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing
|||||||||| damage. Kevin.
||||||||||
|||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||| If I understand correctly;
||||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
||||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly
||||||||||| more hardware 'fault' tolerant)
||||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this
||||||||||| cpu, or possibly bios update required.
||||||||||| What is the mobo?
|||||||||||
||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the
|||||||||||| only card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|||||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually
|||||||||||| for a replacement - except for the processor (expensive
|||||||||||| !). The
|||||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs when the
|||||||||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh
|||||||||||| install, this
|||||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
|||||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
|||||||||||| options.
|||||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old
|||||||||||| Duron 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is
|||||||||||| that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for the
|||||||||||| video editing I'm
|||||||||||| planning to do.
|||||||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I
|||||||||||| went back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just
|||||||||||| the same.
|||||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the
|||||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
|||||||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with
|||||||||||| the XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor
|||||||||||| or op system ?
|||||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
|||||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
||||||||||||
|||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no
||||||||||||| cards, extra hardware
||||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
|||||||||||||
||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and
|||||||||||||| it hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows'
|||||||||||||| progress bar completes. No error messages or re-boots -
|||||||||||||| it just hangs. Machine spec:
|||||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||||||||||||| 330w PSU,
|||||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
|||||||||||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from
|||||||||||||| either floppy or HD fine.
|||||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported
|||||||||||||| before, but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||||||||||||| Please help.
|||||||||||||| Regards,
|||||||||||||| Kevin.
April 25, 2004 8:43:28 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

The problem lies with the cpu, mobo and win2k interacting with both
Its more likely to be the first two combination.
As for what/why???
You could I guess, try creating a new slipstreamed win2k install cd.
Though I confess I doubt it would make any difference
Another thing I notice there are three revisions of this mobo, you updated
correct drivers / bios for your revision?
-clutching at straws here?-

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c6gimt$d15$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> Oh dear - no hope for me then ! :-(
> All the various bits for this new PC were gradually purchased last Autumn.
I
> was then busy working away from home over the winter so I only got the
time
> to try putting everything together about 3 weeks ago.
> Logically, I find it difficult to understand why one build using a set of
> components might work while another build using identical components might
> fail. I can accept that it might happen occasionally but, in the absence
of
> an actual fault somewhere, I can't understand it.
> Given that all other parts have been swapped, the logical conclusion is
that
> the problem lies between the CPU and Windows 2000. Either the XP2400 is
> unable to work in some way that only Windows 2000 (and no other op system)
> requires, or Windows 2000 is trying to do something with the XP2400 (and
not
> with other processors) which the XP2400 should not be doing. The problem
> lies in proving which one - the XP2400 or Windows 2000 - is faulty. In the
> absence of decent diagnostics from Windows 2000, and comprehendsive CPU
test
> and diagnostic software, this is pretty much impossible.
> Purchasing either another XP2400 CPU, or another copy of Windows 2000, is
> not a financially viable option for me.
> The one thing I think I need now is some way forward. By all accounts an
> XP2400 on a GA-7VRXP should be able to run Windows 2000, so it is case of
> pin-pointing the problem.
> Very gratefull for all the help received so far, I'm hoping that somebody
> has a good idea.
> TIA
> Kevin.
>
> DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
> | I mention BT merely as an example of my experience with a piece of
> | hardware not functioning, whilst on an identical setup it was ok.
> | I'm trying to point out; that there are occasions when with identical
> | setups one will work and the other will not.
> | The likelyhood is that if you were able to swap out the mobo and cpu
> | for identical products it would be OK.
> | The only hope for this is if you bought at same time from same
> | supplier
> |
> | "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> | news:c6g47v$clh$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> || DL <> wrote:
> ||| BT? - your ISP is BT
> ||
> || Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to get involved
> || with a hardware or software problem on a machine which hasn't got as
> || far as being 'connected' yet. It can be bad enough (and very
> || time-consuming) trying to get BT to help when there's a connection
> || problem, or their DNS servers are down. Their expensive-to-call
> || helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of inappropriate questions and
> || misleading suggestions (like insisting that I should re-install all
> || my software and buy a new router when they have a DNS problem !). I
> || can imagine they'd probably have me going out buying a new monitor,
> || or removing the HSF to see if the XP2400 gets warm enough ! Their
> || support is worse than useless - the only reason I stick with them is
> || because it would be too much hassle if I lost this e-mail address as
> || I use it to get work.
> || I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another identical
> || one - and the problem was identical too. I could have a shot at
> || trying to return the CPU, but I'd need to show that it is faulty
> || first. As it will merrily run Windows Me (or several other op
> || systems I've tried) with no problem then that is going to be
> || difficult. I could counter that with saying that a Duon 650 does run
> || everything fine.
> || The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet is a
> || completely different m/board. It might just be that the combination
> || of GA-7VRXP, XP2400 and Windows 2000 are incompatible. At the
> || moment, I can swap the XP2400 for a Duron 650, or swap Windows 2000
> || for Windows Me and get a result. What I haven't tried is some
> || different m/board. The main barrier with this is that a new m/board
> || is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
> || I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
> || Kevin.
> ||
> ||| I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial problem
> ||| as been with their hardware.
> ||| The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any of
> ||| which could be the problem, though its more likely to be hardware
> ||| than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu are you able to
> ||| exchange ?
> |||
> ||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> ||| news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with
> ||||| one AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another
> ||||| identical cpu, gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
> ||||| There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
> ||||| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where seemingly
> ||||| with identical hardware one would have a conflict and the other
> ||||| wouldnt.
> ||||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this
> ||||| issue.
> ||||
> |||| BT ? - who are they ?
> |||| I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is Windows
> |||| 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an error message.
> |||| I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I expect will refer
> |||| me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore me or refer me
> |||| elsewhere.
> |||| The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP
> |||| m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of
> |||| Windows 2000 would it all work ?
> |||| Kevin.
> ||||
> ||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only one
> ||||||| I had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat problem,
> ||||||| even using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of it!!
> |||||||
> ||||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu being
> ||||||| correctly identified
> ||||||
> |||||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
> |||||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with either
> |||||| processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can run
> |||||| system identification and
> ||||| benchmarking -
> |||||| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't have
> |||||| is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify it, burn
> |||||| it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the whole works -
> |||||| all instructions, caches, pipelines, everything. I think that
> |||||| this would have to be my next step short of actually buying
> |||||| another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a
> |||||| special way you have
> |||||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
> |||||| instructions, is there ?
> |||||| TIA
> |||||| Kevin.
> ||||||
> ||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
> |||||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
> ||||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
> |||||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
> |||||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz
> |||||||| and it still
> |||||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
> ||||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
> |||||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA modes
> |||||||| properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA card'
> |||||||| drivers.
> |||||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and guess
> |||||||| what ? - no change.
> ||||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings, eg
> ||||||||| cpu.
> |||||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the
> |||||||| settings forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even
> |||||||| tried underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works
> |||||||| fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
> ||||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
> ||||||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
> |||||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after
> |||||||| the 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back to
> |||||||| the Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
> ||||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
> |||||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way
> |||||||| things are going I might be better off using this PC as
> |||||||| landfill and 'cover everything' with concrete !
> ||||||||| Good luck
> |||||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I
> |||||||| could do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I
> |||||||| don't really want to have to spend the rest of my life trying
> |||||||| to edit video on a Duron 650.
> |||||||| Thanks for the help.
> |||||||| Kevin.
> ||||||||
> ||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a Gigabyte
> |||||||||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as staed in my
> |||||||||| original post which is still at the foot of this thread.
> |||||||||| Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB and multiplier
> |||||||||| in the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus clock. Since
> |||||||||| then I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz
> |||||||||| on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166
> |||||||||| MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR =
> |||||||||| 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time - problem
> |||||||||| persists.
> |||||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte
> |||||||||| web site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing
> |||||||||| damage. Kevin.
> ||||||||||
> |||||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||||| If I understand correctly;
> ||||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
> ||||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly
> ||||||||||| more hardware 'fault' tolerant)
> ||||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with this
> ||||||||||| cpu, or possibly bios update required.
> ||||||||||| What is the mobo?
> |||||||||||
> ||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the
> |||||||||||| only card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
> |||||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually
> |||||||||||| for a replacement - except for the processor (expensive
> |||||||||||| !). The
> |||||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs when the
> |||||||||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh
> |||||||||||| install, this
> |||||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
> |||||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
> |||||||||||| options.
> |||||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old
> |||||||||||| Duron 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is
> |||||||||||| that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for the
> |||||||||||| video editing I'm
> |||||||||||| planning to do.
> |||||||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I
> |||||||||||| went back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just
> |||||||||||| the same.
> |||||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the
> |||||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
> |||||||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with
> |||||||||||| the XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different processor
> |||||||||||| or op system ?
> |||||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
> |||||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
> ||||||||||||
> |||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd - no
> ||||||||||||| cards, extra hardware
> ||||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
> |||||||||||||
> ||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> |||||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and
> |||||||||||||| it hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows'
> |||||||||||||| progress bar completes. No error messages or re-boots -
> |||||||||||||| it just hangs. Machine spec:
> |||||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
> |||||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> |||||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> |||||||||||||| 330w PSU,
> |||||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> |||||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with no
> |||||||||||||| change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from
> |||||||||||||| either floppy or HD fine.
> |||||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported
> |||||||||||||| before, but don't recall seeing any solution.
> |||||||||||||| Please help.
> |||||||||||||| Regards,
> |||||||||||||| Kevin.
>
>
Anonymous
April 26, 2004 2:52:54 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

That's okay - I need some straws to clutch at ! ;-)
Yes - that's the frustrating thing. If I could pin this problem down to one
particular thing, and demonstrate that it was faulty, then I could do
something about getting it replaced. I agree that all we seem to be able to
say is that there is something in the difference between Windows 2000 and
Windows Me which won't work correctly with the combination of XP2400 and
GA-7VRXP, and yet is fine with a Duron 650 in the GA-7VRXP.
The logical inference is that either the XP2400 or Windows 2000 is faulty,
but I cannot determine which.
Given the complexities of making a 'slipstreamed' install CD, it strikes me
that I could use a simpler method. I can install Windows 2000 and run it
fine with the Duron 650, but then when I switch over to the XP2400 it hangs.
So I guess I could install a Service Pack with the Duron 650 then switch to
the XP2400 to see if the Service pack had 'corrected a fault' in Windows
2000 ? Given that there are four sevice packs, then I suppose I could cycle
through this procedure four times.
The GA-7VRXP is Revision 1.1 and came with the F12 BIOS fitted - this is the
same as the latest BIOS for the board available from the Gigabyte web site,
so I have no updating or flashing to do. I think that BIOS corruptions can
be ruled out as the board has 'Dual BIOS technology'.
If the vital clue to the problem lies in the difference between a
thunderbird-core Duron 650 and a thoroughbred-core XP2400, then there are
two differences - SSE instructions and level 2 cache. If Windows 2000 has a
problem with either of these two, then I would expect that one of the
Service Packs would directly address that problem. Microsoft do not appear
to have documented this, but would they ?
Kevin.

DL <> wrote:
| The problem lies with the cpu, mobo and win2k interacting with both
| Its more likely to be the first two combination.
| As for what/why???
| You could I guess, try creating a new slipstreamed win2k install cd.
| Though I confess I doubt it would make any difference
| Another thing I notice there are three revisions of this mobo, you
| updated correct drivers / bios for your revision?
| -clutching at straws here?-
|
| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
| news:c6gimt$d15$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
|| Oh dear - no hope for me then ! :-(
|| All the various bits for this new PC were gradually purchased last
|| Autumn. I was then busy working away from home over the winter so I
|| only got the time to try putting everything together about 3 weeks
|| ago.
|| Logically, I find it difficult to understand why one build using a
|| set of components might work while another build using identical
|| components might fail. I can accept that it might happen
|| occasionally but, in the absence of an actual fault somewhere, I
|| can't understand it.
|| Given that all other parts have been swapped, the logical conclusion
|| is that the problem lies between the CPU and Windows 2000. Either
|| the XP2400 is unable to work in some way that only Windows 2000 (and
|| no other op system) requires, or Windows 2000 is trying to do
|| something with the XP2400 (and not with other processors) which the
|| XP2400 should not be doing. The problem lies in proving which one -
|| the XP2400 or Windows 2000 - is faulty. In the absence of decent
|| diagnostics from Windows 2000, and comprehendsive CPU test and
|| diagnostic software, this is pretty much impossible.
|| Purchasing either another XP2400 CPU, or another copy of Windows
|| 2000, is not a financially viable option for me.
|| The one thing I think I need now is some way forward. By all
|| accounts an XP2400 on a GA-7VRXP should be able to run Windows 2000,
|| so it is case of pin-pointing the problem.
|| Very gratefull for all the help received so far, I'm hoping that
|| somebody has a good idea.
|| TIA
|| Kevin.
||
|| DL <> wrote:
||| I mention BT merely as an example of my experience with a piece of
||| hardware not functioning, whilst on an identical setup it was ok.
||| I'm trying to point out; that there are occasions when with
||| identical setups one will work and the other will not.
||| The likelyhood is that if you were able to swap out the mobo and cpu
||| for identical products it would be OK.
||| The only hope for this is if you bought at same time from same
||| supplier
|||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||| news:c6g47v$clh$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
|||| DL <> wrote:
||||| BT? - your ISP is BT
||||
|||| Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to get
|||| involved with a hardware or software problem on a machine which
|||| hasn't got as far as being 'connected' yet. It can be bad enough
|||| (and very time-consuming) trying to get BT to help when there's a
|||| connection problem, or their DNS servers are down. Their
|||| expensive-to-call helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of
|||| inappropriate questions and misleading suggestions (like insisting
|||| that I should re-install all
|||| my software and buy a new router when they have a DNS problem !). I
|||| can imagine they'd probably have me going out buying a new monitor,
|||| or removing the HSF to see if the XP2400 gets warm enough ! Their
|||| support is worse than useless - the only reason I stick with them
|||| is because it would be too much hassle if I lost this e-mail
|||| address as
|||| I use it to get work.
|||| I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another identical
|||| one - and the problem was identical too. I could have a shot at
|||| trying to return the CPU, but I'd need to show that it is faulty
|||| first. As it will merrily run Windows Me (or several other op
|||| systems I've tried) with no problem then that is going to be
|||| difficult. I could counter that with saying that a Duon 650 does
|||| run everything fine.
|||| The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet is a
|||| completely different m/board. It might just be that the combination
|||| of GA-7VRXP, XP2400 and Windows 2000 are incompatible. At the
|||| moment, I can swap the XP2400 for a Duron 650, or swap Windows 2000
|||| for Windows Me and get a result. What I haven't tried is some
|||| different m/board. The main barrier with this is that a new m/board
|||| is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
|||| I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
|||| Kevin.
||||
||||| I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial
||||| problem as been with their hardware.
||||| The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any of
||||| which could be the problem, though its more likely to be hardware
||||| than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu are you able
||||| to exchange ?
|||||
||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||| news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with
||||||| one AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another
||||||| identical cpu, gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
||||||| There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
||||||| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where
||||||| seemingly with identical hardware one would have a conflict and
||||||| the other wouldnt.
||||||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this
||||||| issue.
||||||
|||||| BT ? - who are they ?
|||||| I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is
|||||| Windows 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an
|||||| error message. I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I
|||||| expect will refer me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore
|||||| me or refer me elsewhere.
|||||| The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP
|||||| m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of
|||||| Windows 2000 would it all work ?
|||||| Kevin.
||||||
||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only
||||||||| one
||||||||| I had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat
||||||||| problem, even using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of
||||||||| it!!
|||||||||
||||||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu
||||||||| being correctly identified
||||||||
|||||||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
|||||||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with
|||||||| either processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can
|||||||| run
|||||||| system identification and
||||||| benchmarking -
|||||||| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't
|||||||| have is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify
|||||||| it, burn it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the
|||||||| whole works - all instructions, caches, pipelines, everything.
|||||||| I think that
|||||||| this would have to be my next step short of actually buying
|||||||| another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a
|||||||| special way you have
|||||||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
|||||||| instructions, is there ?
|||||||| TIA
|||||||| Kevin.
||||||||
||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
|||||||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
||||||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
|||||||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
|||||||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz
|||||||||| and it still
|||||||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
||||||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
|||||||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA
|||||||||| modes properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA
|||||||||| card' drivers.
|||||||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and
|||||||||| guess what ? - no change.
||||||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings,
||||||||||| eg cpu.
|||||||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the
|||||||||| settings forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even
|||||||||| tried underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works
|||||||||| fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
||||||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
||||||||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
|||||||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after
|||||||||| the 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back
|||||||||| to the Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
||||||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
|||||||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way
|||||||||| things are going I might be better off using this PC as
|||||||||| landfill and 'cover everything' with concrete !
||||||||||| Good luck
|||||||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I
|||||||||| could do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I
|||||||||| don't really want to have to spend the rest of my life trying
|||||||||| to edit video on a Duron 650.
|||||||||| Thanks for the help.
|||||||||| Kevin.
||||||||||
||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a
|||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as
|||||||||||| staed in my original post which is still at the foot of
|||||||||||| this thread. Originally I left the m/board switches for
|||||||||||| FSB and multiplier in the 'auto' setting, as was the
|||||||||||| memory bus clock. Since
|||||||||||| then I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz
|||||||||||| on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from
|||||||||||| 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus clock
|||||||||||| (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time - problem
|||||||||||| persists.
|||||||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte
|||||||||||| web site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing
|||||||||||| damage. Kevin.
||||||||||||
|||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||||| If I understand correctly;
||||||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
||||||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly
||||||||||||| more hardware 'fault' tolerant)
||||||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with
||||||||||||| this cpu, or possibly bios update required.
||||||||||||| What is the mobo?
|||||||||||||
||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the
|||||||||||||| only card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|||||||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually
|||||||||||||| for a replacement - except for the processor (expensive
|||||||||||||| !). The
|||||||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs when the
|||||||||||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh
|||||||||||||| install, this
|||||||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
|||||||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
|||||||||||||| options.
|||||||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old
|||||||||||||| Duron 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is
|||||||||||||| that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for
|||||||||||||| the video editing I'm
|||||||||||||| planning to do.
|||||||||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I
|||||||||||||| went back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just
|||||||||||||| the same.
|||||||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the
|||||||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
|||||||||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with
|||||||||||||| the XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different
|||||||||||||| processor or op system ?
|||||||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
|||||||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd -
||||||||||||||| no cards, extra hardware
||||||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
|||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||||||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and
|||||||||||||||| it hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows'
|||||||||||||||| progress bar completes. No error messages or re-boots -
|||||||||||||||| it just hangs. Machine spec:
|||||||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||||||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||||||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||||||||||||||| 330w PSU,
|||||||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||||||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with
|||||||||||||||| no change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from
|||||||||||||||| either floppy or HD fine.
|||||||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported
|||||||||||||||| before, but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||||||||||||||| Please help.
|||||||||||||||| Regards,
|||||||||||||||| Kevin.
April 26, 2004 4:16:24 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

There might also be other mobo updated drivers.
I've heard it said that winme is less 'hardware picky' than win2k

"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c6hfg5$7o9$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> That's okay - I need some straws to clutch at ! ;-)
> Yes - that's the frustrating thing. If I could pin this problem down to
one
> particular thing, and demonstrate that it was faulty, then I could do
> something about getting it replaced. I agree that all we seem to be able
to
> say is that there is something in the difference between Windows 2000 and
> Windows Me which won't work correctly with the combination of XP2400 and
> GA-7VRXP, and yet is fine with a Duron 650 in the GA-7VRXP.
> The logical inference is that either the XP2400 or Windows 2000 is faulty,
> but I cannot determine which.
> Given the complexities of making a 'slipstreamed' install CD, it strikes
me
> that I could use a simpler method. I can install Windows 2000 and run it
> fine with the Duron 650, but then when I switch over to the XP2400 it
hangs.
> So I guess I could install a Service Pack with the Duron 650 then switch
to
> the XP2400 to see if the Service pack had 'corrected a fault' in Windows
> 2000 ? Given that there are four sevice packs, then I suppose I could
cycle
> through this procedure four times.
> The GA-7VRXP is Revision 1.1 and came with the F12 BIOS fitted - this is
the
> same as the latest BIOS for the board available from the Gigabyte web
site,
> so I have no updating or flashing to do. I think that BIOS corruptions can
> be ruled out as the board has 'Dual BIOS technology'.
> If the vital clue to the problem lies in the difference between a
> thunderbird-core Duron 650 and a thoroughbred-core XP2400, then there are
> two differences - SSE instructions and level 2 cache. If Windows 2000 has
a
> problem with either of these two, then I would expect that one of the
> Service Packs would directly address that problem. Microsoft do not appear
> to have documented this, but would they ?
> Kevin.
>
> DL <> wrote:
> | The problem lies with the cpu, mobo and win2k interacting with both
> | Its more likely to be the first two combination.
> | As for what/why???
> | You could I guess, try creating a new slipstreamed win2k install cd.
> | Though I confess I doubt it would make any difference
> | Another thing I notice there are three revisions of this mobo, you
> | updated correct drivers / bios for your revision?
> | -clutching at straws here?-
> |
> | "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> | news:c6gimt$d15$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> || Oh dear - no hope for me then ! :-(
> || All the various bits for this new PC were gradually purchased last
> || Autumn. I was then busy working away from home over the winter so I
> || only got the time to try putting everything together about 3 weeks
> || ago.
> || Logically, I find it difficult to understand why one build using a
> || set of components might work while another build using identical
> || components might fail. I can accept that it might happen
> || occasionally but, in the absence of an actual fault somewhere, I
> || can't understand it.
> || Given that all other parts have been swapped, the logical conclusion
> || is that the problem lies between the CPU and Windows 2000. Either
> || the XP2400 is unable to work in some way that only Windows 2000 (and
> || no other op system) requires, or Windows 2000 is trying to do
> || something with the XP2400 (and not with other processors) which the
> || XP2400 should not be doing. The problem lies in proving which one -
> || the XP2400 or Windows 2000 - is faulty. In the absence of decent
> || diagnostics from Windows 2000, and comprehendsive CPU test and
> || diagnostic software, this is pretty much impossible.
> || Purchasing either another XP2400 CPU, or another copy of Windows
> || 2000, is not a financially viable option for me.
> || The one thing I think I need now is some way forward. By all
> || accounts an XP2400 on a GA-7VRXP should be able to run Windows 2000,
> || so it is case of pin-pointing the problem.
> || Very gratefull for all the help received so far, I'm hoping that
> || somebody has a good idea.
> || TIA
> || Kevin.
> ||
> || DL <> wrote:
> ||| I mention BT merely as an example of my experience with a piece of
> ||| hardware not functioning, whilst on an identical setup it was ok.
> ||| I'm trying to point out; that there are occasions when with
> ||| identical setups one will work and the other will not.
> ||| The likelyhood is that if you were able to swap out the mobo and cpu
> ||| for identical products it would be OK.
> ||| The only hope for this is if you bought at same time from same
> ||| supplier
> |||
> ||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||| news:c6g47v$clh$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> |||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||| BT? - your ISP is BT
> ||||
> |||| Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to get
> |||| involved with a hardware or software problem on a machine which
> |||| hasn't got as far as being 'connected' yet. It can be bad enough
> |||| (and very time-consuming) trying to get BT to help when there's a
> |||| connection problem, or their DNS servers are down. Their
> |||| expensive-to-call helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of
> |||| inappropriate questions and misleading suggestions (like insisting
> |||| that I should re-install all
> |||| my software and buy a new router when they have a DNS problem !). I
> |||| can imagine they'd probably have me going out buying a new monitor,
> |||| or removing the HSF to see if the XP2400 gets warm enough ! Their
> |||| support is worse than useless - the only reason I stick with them
> |||| is because it would be too much hassle if I lost this e-mail
> |||| address as
> |||| I use it to get work.
> |||| I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another identical
> |||| one - and the problem was identical too. I could have a shot at
> |||| trying to return the CPU, but I'd need to show that it is faulty
> |||| first. As it will merrily run Windows Me (or several other op
> |||| systems I've tried) with no problem then that is going to be
> |||| difficult. I could counter that with saying that a Duon 650 does
> |||| run everything fine.
> |||| The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet is a
> |||| completely different m/board. It might just be that the combination
> |||| of GA-7VRXP, XP2400 and Windows 2000 are incompatible. At the
> |||| moment, I can swap the XP2400 for a Duron 650, or swap Windows 2000
> |||| for Windows Me and get a result. What I haven't tried is some
> |||| different m/board. The main barrier with this is that a new m/board
> |||| is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
> |||| I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
> |||| Kevin.
> ||||
> ||||| I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial
> ||||| problem as been with their hardware.
> ||||| The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any of
> ||||| which could be the problem, though its more likely to be hardware
> ||||| than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu are you able
> ||||| to exchange ?
> |||||
> ||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||| news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with
> ||||||| one AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another
> ||||||| identical cpu, gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
> ||||||| There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
> ||||||| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where
> ||||||| seemingly with identical hardware one would have a conflict and
> ||||||| the other wouldnt.
> ||||||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this
> ||||||| issue.
> ||||||
> |||||| BT ? - who are they ?
> |||||| I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is
> |||||| Windows 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an
> |||||| error message. I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I
> |||||| expect will refer me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore
> |||||| me or refer me elsewhere.
> |||||| The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP
> |||||| m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of
> |||||| Windows 2000 would it all work ?
> |||||| Kevin.
> ||||||
> ||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only
> ||||||||| one
> ||||||||| I had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat
> ||||||||| problem, even using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of
> ||||||||| it!!
> |||||||||
> ||||||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu
> ||||||||| being correctly identified
> ||||||||
> |||||||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
> |||||||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with
> |||||||| either processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can
> |||||||| run
> |||||||| system identification and
> ||||||| benchmarking -
> |||||||| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't
> |||||||| have is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify
> |||||||| it, burn it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the
> |||||||| whole works - all instructions, caches, pipelines, everything.
> |||||||| I think that
> |||||||| this would have to be my next step short of actually buying
> |||||||| another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a
> |||||||| special way you have
> |||||||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
> |||||||| instructions, is there ?
> |||||||| TIA
> |||||||| Kevin.
> ||||||||
> ||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
> |||||||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
> ||||||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. - yes?
> |||||||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
> |||||||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz
> |||||||||| and it still
> |||||||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
> ||||||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
> |||||||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA
> |||||||||| modes properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA
> |||||||||| card' drivers.
> |||||||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and
> |||||||||| guess what ? - no change.
> ||||||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings,
> ||||||||||| eg cpu.
> |||||||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the
> |||||||||| settings forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even
> |||||||||| tried underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works
> |||||||||| fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
> ||||||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
> ||||||||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
> |||||||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after
> |||||||||| the 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back
> |||||||||| to the Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
> ||||||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
> |||||||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way
> |||||||||| things are going I might be better off using this PC as
> |||||||||| landfill and 'cover everything' with concrete !
> ||||||||||| Good luck
> |||||||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I
> |||||||||| could do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I
> |||||||||| don't really want to have to spend the rest of my life trying
> |||||||||| to edit video on a Duron 650.
> |||||||||| Thanks for the help.
> |||||||||| Kevin.
> ||||||||||
> ||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a
> |||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as
> |||||||||||| staed in my original post which is still at the foot of
> |||||||||||| this thread. Originally I left the m/board switches for
> |||||||||||| FSB and multiplier in the 'auto' setting, as was the
> |||||||||||| memory bus clock. Since
> |||||||||||| then I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz
> |||||||||||| on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and from
> |||||||||||| 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus clock
> |||||||||||| (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time - problem
> |||||||||||| persists.
> |||||||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte
> |||||||||||| web site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing
> |||||||||||| damage. Kevin.
> ||||||||||||
> |||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||||||| If I understand correctly;
> ||||||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
> ||||||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly
> ||||||||||||| more hardware 'fault' tolerant)
> ||||||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with
> ||||||||||||| this cpu, or possibly bios update required.
> ||||||||||||| What is the mobo?
> |||||||||||||
> ||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the
> |||||||||||||| only card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
> |||||||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually
> |||||||||||||| for a replacement - except for the processor (expensive
> |||||||||||||| !). The
> |||||||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs when the
> |||||||||||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh
> |||||||||||||| install, this
> |||||||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
> |||||||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
> |||||||||||||| options.
> |||||||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old
> |||||||||||||| Duron 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is
> |||||||||||||| that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for
> |||||||||||||| the video editing I'm
> |||||||||||||| planning to do.
> |||||||||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I
> |||||||||||||| went back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just
> |||||||||||||| the same.
> |||||||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the
> |||||||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
> |||||||||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with
> |||||||||||||| the XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different
> |||||||||||||| processor or op system ?
> |||||||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
> |||||||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
> ||||||||||||||
> |||||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd -
> ||||||||||||||| no cards, extra hardware
> ||||||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
> |||||||||||||||
> ||||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> |||||||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and
> |||||||||||||||| it hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows'
> |||||||||||||||| progress bar completes. No error messages or re-boots -
> |||||||||||||||| it just hangs. Machine spec:
> |||||||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
> |||||||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> |||||||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> |||||||||||||||| 330w PSU,
> |||||||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> |||||||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with
> |||||||||||||||| no change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from
> |||||||||||||||| either floppy or HD fine.
> |||||||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported
> |||||||||||||||| before, but don't recall seeing any solution.
> |||||||||||||||| Please help.
> |||||||||||||||| Regards,
> |||||||||||||||| Kevin.
>
>
April 27, 2004 12:43:47 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

what are the power settings on the motherboard apm/acpi ??

win2K is very fussy about hardware

is the fan mounted Ok on the cpu - temp problems ?

faulty power supply ?

rotate the ram perhaps one is faulty.

re seat on cards and peripherals.

I think you mentioned but try a minimal setup first

good luck

Geoff



"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c6gimt$d15$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> Oh dear - no hope for me then ! :-(
> All the various bits for this new PC were gradually
purchased last Autumn. I
> was then busy working away from home over the winter so I
only got the time
> to try putting everything together about 3 weeks ago.
> Logically, I find it difficult to understand why one build
using a set of
> components might work while another build using identical
components might
> fail. I can accept that it might happen occasionally but,
in the absence of
> an actual fault somewhere, I can't understand it.
> Given that all other parts have been swapped, the logical
conclusion is that
> the problem lies between the CPU and Windows 2000. Either
the XP2400 is
> unable to work in some way that only Windows 2000 (and no
other op system)
> requires, or Windows 2000 is trying to do something with
the XP2400 (and not
> with other processors) which the XP2400 should not be
doing. The problem
> lies in proving which one - the XP2400 or Windows 2000 -
is faulty. In the
> absence of decent diagnostics from Windows 2000, and
comprehendsive CPU test
> and diagnostic software, this is pretty much impossible.
> Purchasing either another XP2400 CPU, or another copy of
Windows 2000, is
> not a financially viable option for me.
> The one thing I think I need now is some way forward. By
all accounts an
> XP2400 on a GA-7VRXP should be able to run Windows 2000,
so it is case of
> pin-pointing the problem.
> Very gratefull for all the help received so far, I'm
hoping that somebody
> has a good idea.
> TIA
> Kevin.
>
> DL <dl@spoofmail.com> wrote:
> | I mention BT merely as an example of my experience with
a piece of
> | hardware not functioning, whilst on an identical setup
it was ok.
> | I'm trying to point out; that there are occasions when
with identical
> | setups one will work and the other will not.
> | The likelyhood is that if you were able to swap out the
mobo and cpu
> | for identical products it would be OK.
> | The only hope for this is if you bought at same time
from same
> | supplier
> |
> | "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> | news:c6g47v$clh$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> || DL <> wrote:
> ||| BT? - your ISP is BT
> ||
> || Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to
get involved
> || with a hardware or software problem on a machine which
hasn't got as
> || far as being 'connected' yet. It can be bad enough (and
very
> || time-consuming) trying to get BT to help when there's a
connection
> || problem, or their DNS servers are down. Their
expensive-to-call
> || helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of inappropriate
questions and
> || misleading suggestions (like insisting that I should
re-install all
> || my software and buy a new router when they have a DNS
problem !). I
> || can imagine they'd probably have me going out buying a
new monitor,
> || or removing the HSF to see if the XP2400 gets warm
enough ! Their
> || support is worse than useless - the only reason I stick
with them is
> || because it would be too much hassle if I lost this
e-mail address as
> || I use it to get work.
> || I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another
identical
> || one - and the problem was identical too. I could have a
shot at
> || trying to return the CPU, but I'd need to show that it
is faulty
> || first. As it will merrily run Windows Me (or several
other op
> || systems I've tried) with no problem then that is going
to be
> || difficult. I could counter that with saying that a Duon
650 does run
> || everything fine.
> || The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet
is a
> || completely different m/board. It might just be that the
combination
> || of GA-7VRXP, XP2400 and Windows 2000 are incompatible.
At the
> || moment, I can swap the XP2400 for a Duron 650, or swap
Windows 2000
> || for Windows Me and get a result. What I haven't tried
is some
> || different m/board. The main barrier with this is that a
new m/board
> || is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
> || I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
> || Kevin.
> ||
> ||| I spoke with them because I was able to identify the
initial problem
> ||| as been with their hardware.
> ||| The problem is that you have at least three pieces of
kit, any of
> ||| which could be the problem, though its more likely to
be hardware
> ||| than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu
are you able to
> ||| exchange ?
> |||
> ||| "Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> ||| news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the
problem with
> ||||| one AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for
another
> ||||| identical cpu, gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
> ||||| There have been reports of the occasional problems
with various
> ||||| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago,
where seemingly
> ||||| with identical hardware one would have a conflict
and the other
> ||||| wouldnt.
> ||||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD
over this
> ||||| issue.
> ||||
> |||| BT ? - who are they ?
> |||| I would really like for MS to be involved. After all,
it is Windows
> |||| 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an
error message.
> |||| I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I
expect will refer
> |||| me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore me or
refer me
> |||| elsewhere.
> |||| The question is: if I were to go out and buy another
GA-7VRXP
> |||| m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh
shrink-wrapped copy of
> |||| Windows 2000 would it all work ?
> |||| Kevin.
> ||||
> ||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups
the only one
> ||||||| I had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an
heat problem,
> ||||||| even using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom
of it!!
> |||||||
> ||||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the
new cpu being
> ||||||| correctly identified
> ||||||
> |||||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and
the XP2400
> |||||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which
works with either
> |||||| processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which
can run
> |||||| system identification and
> ||||| benchmarking -
> |||||| everything shows up correctly with all of them.
What I don't have
> |||||| is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can
identify it, burn
> |||||| it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the
whole works -
> |||||| all instructions, caches, pipelines, everything. I
think that
> |||||| this would have to be my next step short of
actually buying
> |||||| another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess
there isn't a
> |||||| special way you have
> |||||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because
of the SSE
> |||||| instructions, is there ?
> |||||| TIA
> |||||| Kevin.
> ||||||
> ||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
> |||||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread.
;-)
> ||||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with
Duran. - yes?
> |||||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the
FSB and
> |||||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650
up to 897 MHz
> |||||||| and it still
> |||||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
> ||||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
> |||||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the
standard VESA modes
> |||||||| properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic
VGA card'
> |||||||| drivers.
> |||||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox
drivers and guess
> |||||||| what ? - no change.
> ||||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and
check settings, eg
> ||||||||| cpu.
> |||||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and
with the
> |||||||| settings forcing the correct FSB and multiplier.
I've even
> |||||||| tried underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no
change - works
> |||||||| fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000
startup.
> ||||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you
may have to
> ||||||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
> |||||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation
hangs after
> |||||||| the 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to
swap back to
> |||||||| the Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
> ||||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered
everything.
> |||||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a
problem. The way
> |||||||| things are going I might be better off using this
PC as
> |||||||| landfill and 'cover everything' with concrete !
> ||||||||| Good luck
> |||||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle.
At least, I
> |||||||| could do with some decent diagnostics out of
Windows 2000. I
> |||||||| don't really want to have to spend the rest of my
life trying
> |||||||| to edit video on a Duron 650.
> |||||||| Thanks for the help.
> |||||||| Kevin.
> ||||||||
> ||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> |||||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard
is a Gigabyte
> |||||||||| GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as
staed in my
> |||||||||| original post which is still at the foot of
this thread.
> |||||||||| Originally I left the m/board switches for FSB
and multiplier
> |||||||||| in the 'auto' setting, as was the memory bus
clock. Since
> |||||||||| then I've tried slowing things down from 133
MHz to 100 MHz
> |||||||||| on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR),
and from 166
> |||||||||| MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus
clock (DDR =
> |||||||||| 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time -
problem
> |||||||||| persists.
> |||||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on
the Gigabyte
> |||||||||| web site. Not too sure what else I can adjust
without doing
> |||||||||| damage. Kevin.
> ||||||||||
> |||||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||||| If I understand correctly;
> ||||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted
correctly
> ||||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I
believe slightly
> ||||||||||| more hardware 'fault' tolerant)
> ||||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo
setting, with this
> ||||||||||| cpu, or possibly bios update required.
> ||||||||||| What is the mobo?
> |||||||||||
> ||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> ||||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> |||||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go
anyway, the
> |||||||||||| only card being the Matrix G400 graphics
card.
> |||||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component
individually
> |||||||||||| for a replacement - except for the processor
(expensive
> |||||||||||| !). The
> |||||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs
when the
> |||||||||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes.
With a fresh
> |||||||||||| install, this
> |||||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
> |||||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any
'recovery'
> |||||||||||| options.
> |||||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor
for an old
> |||||||||||| Duron 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem
with that is
> |||||||||||| that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough
performance for the
> |||||||||||| video editing I'm
> |||||||||||| planning to do.
> |||||||||||| After the system was fully working with the
Duron 650 I
> |||||||||||| went back to the XP2400 and the problem
re-emerged just
> |||||||||||| the same.
> |||||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that
runs on the
> |||||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the
processor.
> |||||||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000
is doing with
> |||||||||||| the XP2400 which doesn't happen with a
different processor
> |||||||||||| or op system ?
> |||||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help
gratefully
> |||||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
> ||||||||||||
> |||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
> ||||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB,
mouse,cd - no
> ||||||||||||| cards, extra hardware
> ||||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
> |||||||||||||
> ||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
> |||||||||||||
news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> |||||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new
machine and
> |||||||||||||| it hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting
Windows'
> |||||||||||||| progress bar completes. No error messages
or re-boots -
> |||||||||||||| it just hangs. Machine spec:
> |||||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
> |||||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
> |||||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
> |||||||||||||| 330w PSU,
> |||||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
> |||||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been
swapped-out with no
> |||||||||||||| change in result. The system can boot into
DOS, from
> |||||||||||||| either floppy or HD fine.
> |||||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems
reported
> |||||||||||||| before, but don't recall seeing any
solution.
> |||||||||||||| Please help.
> |||||||||||||| Regards,
> |||||||||||||| Kevin.
>
>
April 27, 2004 12:46:45 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

in line


"Kevin Lawton" <kepla@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c6hfg5$7o9$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> That's okay - I need some straws to clutch at ! ;-)
> Yes - that's the frustrating thing. If I could pin this
problem down to one
> particular thing, and demonstrate that it was faulty, then
I could do
> something about getting it replaced. I agree that all we
seem to be able to
> say is that there is something in the difference between
Windows 2000 and
> Windows Me which won't work correctly with the combination
of XP2400 and
> GA-7VRXP, and yet is fine with a Duron 650 in the
GA-7VRXP.
> The logical inference is that either the XP2400 or Windows
2000 is faulty,
> but I cannot determine which.
> Given the complexities of making a 'slipstreamed' install
CD, it strikes me
> that I could use a simpler method. I can install Windows
2000 and run it
> fine with the Duron 650, but then when I switch over to
the XP2400 it hangs.
> So I guess I could install a Service Pack with the Duron
650 then switch to
> the XP2400 to see if the Service pack had 'corrected a
fault' in Windows
> 2000 ? Given that there are four sevice packs, then I
suppose I could cycle


only need to install latest service pack

> through this procedure four times.
> The GA-7VRXP is Revision 1.1 and came with the F12 BIOS
fitted - this is the
> same as the latest BIOS for the board available from the
Gigabyte web site,
> so I have no updating or flashing to do. I think that BIOS
corruptions can
> be ruled out as the board has 'Dual BIOS technology'.
> If the vital clue to the problem lies in the difference
between a
> thunderbird-core Duron 650 and a thoroughbred-core XP2400,
then there are

does MB support "XP" processors ?

> two differences - SSE instructions and level 2 cache. If
Windows 2000 has a
> problem with either of these two, then I would expect that
one of the
> Service Packs would directly address that problem.
Microsoft do not appear
> to have documented this, but would they ?
> Kevin.
Anonymous
April 27, 2004 3:28:57 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

Geoffw <gwinnetSPAM@SPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
| what are the power settings on the motherboard apm/acpi ??

To keep things simple, I've got all power management turned off while I get
this problem sorted out.

| win2K is very fussy about hardware

Dead right there ! - it loves the Duron 650, but hates the XP2400, while
Windows Me is happy with either.

| is the fan mounted Ok on the cpu - temp problems ?

Oh yes, and with a nice thin smear of Arctic Silver too. CPU temperature
through the BIOS reports at 43 degrees on the XP2400. Have tried the system
on an overnight burn-in with little temperature rise - one or two degrees at
most.

| faulty power supply ?

I've tried two replacements with no change. The current branded 550w job
should be more than good enough for this minimal system. Voltage levels
reported in the BIOS are within spec - checked against AMD recommended
figures.

| rotate the ram perhaps one is faulty.

Tried several - all PC2700 - some Crucial, some Samsung, some others.
Different slots too. Same result every time.

| re seat on cards and peripherals.

The only card at the moment is the Matrox G400 AGP graphics card. Have tried
a Matrox Mystique 220 PCI graphics card instead - same result.

| I think you mentioned but try a minimal setup first

Really minimal - I've even tried removing the DVD and floppy drives, booting
with only a HDD in place.

| good luck

Thanks, but I'm beginning to feel that a miracle is needed !
Kevin.

| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
| news:c6gimt$d15$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
|| Oh dear - no hope for me then ! :-(
|| All the various bits for this new PC were gradually purchased last
|| Autumn. I was then busy working away from home over the winter so I
|| only got the time to try putting everything together about 3 weeks
|| ago. Logically, I find it difficult to understand why one build
|| using a set of components might work while another build using
|| identical components might fail. I can accept that it might happen
|| occasionally but, in the absence of an actual fault somewhere, I
|| can't understand it.
|| Given that all other parts have been swapped, the logical conclusion
|| is that the problem lies between the CPU and Windows 2000. Either
|| the XP2400 is unable to work in some way that only Windows 2000 (and
|| no other op system) requires, or Windows 2000 is trying to do
|| something with the XP2400 (and not with other processors) which the
|| XP2400 should not be doing. The problem lies in proving which one -
|| the XP2400 or Windows 2000 - is faulty. In the absence of decent
|| diagnostics from Windows 2000, and comprehendsive CPU test and
|| diagnostic software, this is pretty much impossible. Purchasing
|| either another XP2400 CPU, or another copy of Windows 2000, is not a
|| financially viable option for me.
|| The one thing I think I need now is some way forward. By all
|| accounts an XP2400 on a GA-7VRXP should be able to run Windows 2000,
|| so it is case of pin-pointing the problem.
|| Very gratefull for all the help received so far, I'm hoping that
|| somebody has a good idea.
|| TIA
|| Kevin.
||
|| DL <> wrote:
||| I mention BT merely as an example of my experience with a piece of
||| hardware not functioning, whilst on an identical setup it was ok.
||| I'm trying to point out; that there are occasions when with
||| identical setups one will work and the other will not.
||| The likelyhood is that if you were able to swap out the mobo and cpu
||| for identical products it would be OK.
||| The only hope for this is if you bought at same time from same
||| supplier
|||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||| news:c6g47v$clh$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
|||| DL <> wrote:
||||| BT? - your ISP is BT
||||
|||| Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to get
|||| involved with a hardware or software problem on a machine which
|||| hasn't got as far as being 'connected' yet. It can be bad enough
|||| (and very time-consuming) trying to get BT to help when there's a
|||| connection problem, or their DNS servers are down. Their
|||| expensive-to-call helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of
|||| inappropriate questions and misleading suggestions (like insisting
|||| that I should re-install all my software and buy a new router when
|||| they have a DNS problem !). I can imagine they'd probably have me
|||| going out buying a new monitor, or removing the HSF to see if the
|||| XP2400 gets warm enough ! Their support is worse than useless -
|||| the only reason I stick with them is because it would be too much
|||| hassle if I lost this e-mail address as I use it to get work.
|||| I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another identical
|||| one - and the problem was identical too. I could have a shot at
|||| trying to return the CPU, but I'd need to show that it is faulty
|||| first. As it will merrily run Windows Me (or several other op
|||| systems I've tried) with no problem then that is going to be
|||| difficult. I could counter that with saying that a Duon 650 does
|||| run everything fine.
|||| The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet is a
|||| completely different m/board. It might just be that the combination
|||| of GA-7VRXP, XP2400 and Windows 2000 are incompatible. At the
|||| moment, I can swap the XP2400 for a Duron 650, or swap Windows 2000
|||| for Windows Me and get a result. What I haven't tried is some
|||| different m/board. The main barrier with this is that a new m/board
|||| is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
|||| I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
|||| Kevin.
||||
||||| I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial
||||| problem as been with their hardware.
||||| The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any of
||||| which could be the problem, though its more likely to be hardware
||||| than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu are you able
||||| to exchange ?
|||||
||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||| news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem with
||||||| one AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another
||||||| identical cpu, gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
||||||| There have been reports of the occasional problems with various
||||||| hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago, where
||||||| seemingly with identical hardware one would have a conflict and
||||||| the other wouldnt.
||||||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this
||||||| issue.
||||||
|||||| BT ? - who are they ?
|||||| I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is
|||||| Windows 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an
|||||| error message. I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who I
|||||| expect will refer me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either ignore
|||||| me or refer me elsewhere.
|||||| The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP
|||||| m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy of
|||||| Windows 2000 would it all work ?
|||||| Kevin.
||||||
||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only
||||||||| one I had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat
||||||||| problem, even using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of
||||||||| it!!
|||||||||
||||||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu
||||||||| being correctly identified
||||||||
|||||||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
|||||||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with
|||||||| either processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which can
|||||||| run system identification and
||||||| benchmarking -
|||||||| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't
|||||||| have is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify
|||||||| it, burn it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the
|||||||| whole works - all instructions, caches, pipelines, everything.
|||||||| I think that this would have to be my next step short of
|||||||| actually buying another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I
|||||||| guess there isn't a special way you have
|||||||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
|||||||| instructions, is there ?
|||||||| TIA
|||||||| Kevin.
||||||||
||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
|||||||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread.
| ;-)
||||||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with
| Duran. - yes?
|||||||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
|||||||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897 MHz
|||||||||| and it still
|||||||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
||||||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
|||||||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA
|||||||||| modes properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA
|||||||||| card' drivers.
|||||||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and
|||||||||| guess what ? - no change.
||||||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check settings,
||||||||||| eg cpu.
|||||||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the
|||||||||| settings forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even
|||||||||| tried underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change - works
|||||||||| fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000
| startup.
||||||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have to
||||||||||| enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
|||||||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs after
|||||||||| the 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to swap back
|||||||||| to the Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
||||||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered
| everything.
|||||||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The way
|||||||||| things are going I might be better off using this PC as
|||||||||| landfill and 'cover everything' with concrete !
||||||||||| Good luck
|||||||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At least, I
|||||||||| could do with some decent diagnostics out of Windows 2000. I
|||||||||| don't really want to have to spend the rest of my life trying
|||||||||| to edit video on a Duron 650.
|||||||||| Thanks for the help.
|||||||||| Kevin.
||||||||||
||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a
|||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as
|||||||||||| staed in my original post which is still at the foot of
|||||||||||| this thread. Originally I left the m/board switches for
|||||||||||| FSB and multiplier in the 'auto' setting, as was the
|||||||||||| memory bus clock. Since then I've tried slowing things
|||||||||||| down from 133 MHz to 100 MHz on the FSB (effectively 266
|||||||||||| -> 200 due to DDR), and from 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100
|||||||||||| MHz on the memory bus clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200).
|||||||||||| Same result every time - problem persists.
|||||||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the Gigabyte
|||||||||||| web site. Not too sure what else I can adjust without doing
|||||||||||| damage. Kevin.
||||||||||||
|||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||||| If I understand correctly;
||||||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
||||||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe slightly
||||||||||||| more hardware 'fault' tolerant)
||||||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with
||||||||||||| this cpu, or possibly bios update required.
||||||||||||| What is the mobo?
|||||||||||||
||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway, the
|||||||||||||| only card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|||||||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually
|||||||||||||| for a replacement - except for the processor (expensive
|||||||||||||| !). The
|||||||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs when the
|||||||||||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh
|||||||||||||| install, this
|||||||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
|||||||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
|||||||||||||| options.
|||||||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old
|||||||||||||| Duron 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is
|||||||||||||| that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for
|||||||||||||| the video editing I'm
|||||||||||||| planning to do.
|||||||||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I
|||||||||||||| went back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just
|||||||||||||| the same.
|||||||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the
|||||||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the processor.
|||||||||||||| Could there be something which Windows 2000 is doing with
|||||||||||||| the XP2400 which doesn't happen with a different
|||||||||||||| processor or op system ?
|||||||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
|||||||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd -
||||||||||||||| no cards, extra hardware
||||||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
|||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
|||||||||||||||
| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||||||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine and
|||||||||||||||| it hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows'
|||||||||||||||| progress bar completes. No error messages or re-boots -
|||||||||||||||| it just hangs. Machine spec:
|||||||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||||||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||||||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||||||||||||||| 330w PSU,
|||||||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||||||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out with
|||||||||||||||| no change in result. The system can boot into DOS, from
|||||||||||||||| either floppy or HD fine.
|||||||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported
|||||||||||||||| before, but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||||||||||||||| Please help.
|||||||||||||||| Regards,
|||||||||||||||| Kevin.
Anonymous
April 27, 2004 3:34:50 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)

DL <> wrote:
| There might also be other mobo updated drivers.

True, but at the moment I've got all the fancy bits on the mobo turned off
in the BIOS. It is working fine with the default Windows 2000 drivers off
the Windows 2000 install CD when the Duron 650 is in instead of the XP2400.

| I've heard it said that winme is less 'hardware picky' than win2k

That's very true. At the moment Windows 2000 picks the Duron 650 but refuses
the XP2400, whereas Windows Me likes them both. Could that be a clue ?
Kevin.

| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
| news:c6hfg5$7o9$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|| That's okay - I need some straws to clutch at ! ;-)
|| Yes - that's the frustrating thing. If I could pin this problem down
|| to one particular thing, and demonstrate that it was faulty, then I
|| could do something about getting it replaced. I agree that all we
|| seem to be able to say is that there is something in the difference
|| between Windows 2000 and Windows Me which won't work correctly with
|| the combination of XP2400 and GA-7VRXP, and yet is fine with a Duron
|| 650 in the GA-7VRXP.
|| The logical inference is that either the XP2400 or Windows 2000 is
|| faulty, but I cannot determine which.
|| Given the complexities of making a 'slipstreamed' install CD, it
|| strikes me that I could use a simpler method. I can install Windows
|| 2000 and run it fine with the Duron 650, but then when I switch over
|| to the XP2400 it hangs. So I guess I could install a Service Pack
|| with the Duron 650 then switch to the XP2400 to see if the Service
|| pack had 'corrected a fault' in Windows 2000 ? Given that there are
|| four sevice packs, then I suppose I could cycle through this
|| procedure four times.
|| The GA-7VRXP is Revision 1.1 and came with the F12 BIOS fitted -
|| this is the same as the latest BIOS for the board available from the
|| Gigabyte web site, so I have no updating or flashing to do. I think
|| that BIOS corruptions can be ruled out as the board has 'Dual BIOS
|| technology'.
|| If the vital clue to the problem lies in the difference between a
|| thunderbird-core Duron 650 and a thoroughbred-core XP2400, then
|| there are two differences - SSE instructions and level 2 cache. If
|| Windows 2000 has a problem with either of these two, then I would
|| expect that one of the Service Packs would directly address that
|| problem. Microsoft do not appear to have documented this, but would
|| they ?
|| Kevin.
||
|| DL <> wrote:
||| The problem lies with the cpu, mobo and win2k interacting with both
||| Its more likely to be the first two combination.
||| As for what/why???
||| You could I guess, try creating a new slipstreamed win2k install cd.
||| Though I confess I doubt it would make any difference
||| Another thing I notice there are three revisions of this mobo, you
||| updated correct drivers / bios for your revision?
||| -clutching at straws here?-
|||
||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||| news:c6gimt$d15$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
|||| Oh dear - no hope for me then ! :-(
|||| All the various bits for this new PC were gradually purchased last
|||| Autumn. I was then busy working away from home over the winter so I
|||| only got the time to try putting everything together about 3 weeks
|||| ago.
|||| Logically, I find it difficult to understand why one build using a
|||| set of components might work while another build using identical
|||| components might fail. I can accept that it might happen
|||| occasionally but, in the absence of an actual fault somewhere, I
|||| can't understand it.
|||| Given that all other parts have been swapped, the logical
|||| conclusion is that the problem lies between the CPU and Windows
|||| 2000. Either
|||| the XP2400 is unable to work in some way that only Windows 2000
|||| (and no other op system) requires, or Windows 2000 is trying to do
|||| something with the XP2400 (and not with other processors) which the
|||| XP2400 should not be doing. The problem lies in proving which one -
|||| the XP2400 or Windows 2000 - is faulty. In the absence of decent
|||| diagnostics from Windows 2000, and comprehendsive CPU test and
|||| diagnostic software, this is pretty much impossible.
|||| Purchasing either another XP2400 CPU, or another copy of Windows
|||| 2000, is not a financially viable option for me.
|||| The one thing I think I need now is some way forward. By all
|||| accounts an XP2400 on a GA-7VRXP should be able to run Windows
|||| 2000, so it is case of pin-pointing the problem.
|||| Very gratefull for all the help received so far, I'm hoping that
|||| somebody has a good idea.
|||| TIA
|||| Kevin.
||||
|||| DL <> wrote:
||||| I mention BT merely as an example of my experience with a piece of
||||| hardware not functioning, whilst on an identical setup it was ok.
||||| I'm trying to point out; that there are occasions when with
||||| identical setups one will work and the other will not.
||||| The likelyhood is that if you were able to swap out the mobo and
||||| cpu for identical products it would be OK.
||||| The only hope for this is if you bought at same time from same
||||| supplier
|||||
||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||| news:c6g47v$clh$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
|||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||| BT? - your ISP is BT
||||||
|||||| Well yes, my ISP is BT but I don't think they'd want to get
|||||| involved with a hardware or software problem on a machine which
|||||| hasn't got as far as being 'connected' yet. It can be bad enough
|||||| (and very time-consuming) trying to get BT to help when there's a
|||||| connection problem, or their DNS servers are down. Their
|||||| expensive-to-call helpdesk staff just follow a 'script' of
|||||| inappropriate questions and misleading suggestions (like
|||||| insisting that I should re-install all
|||||| my software and buy a new router when they have a DNS problem
|||||| !). I can imagine they'd probably have me going out buying a new
|||||| monitor, or removing the HSF to see if the XP2400 gets warm
|||||| enough ! Their support is worse than useless - the only reason I
|||||| stick with them
|||||| is because it would be too much hassle if I lost this e-mail
|||||| address as
|||||| I use it to get work.
|||||| I've already tried swapping out the m/board for another identical
|||||| one - and the problem was identical too. I could have a shot at
|||||| trying to return the CPU, but I'd need to show that it is faulty
|||||| first. As it will merrily run Windows Me (or several other op
|||||| systems I've tried) with no problem then that is going to be
|||||| difficult. I could counter that with saying that a Duon 650 does
|||||| run everything fine.
|||||| The one variable I haven't tried in this 'equation' yet is a
|||||| completely different m/board. It might just be that the
|||||| combination of GA-7VRXP, XP2400 and Windows 2000 are
|||||| incompatible. At the moment, I can swap the XP2400 for a Duron
|||||| 650, or swap Windows 2000 for Windows Me and get a result. What
|||||| I haven't tried is some different m/board. The main barrier with
|||||| this is that a new m/board is just as inaffordable as a new CPU.
|||||| I think my PC is bad for my mental health !
|||||| Kevin.
||||||
||||||| I spoke with them because I was able to identify the initial
||||||| problem as been with their hardware.
||||||| The problem is that you have at least three pieces of kit, any
||||||| of which could be the problem, though its more likely to be
||||||| hardware than software. If you recently purchased mobo or cpu
||||||| are you able to exchange ?
|||||||
||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||| news:c6f48p$irc$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||| Nothing special as far as I'm aware, I only had the problem
||||||||| with one AMD cpu, never cured it and I did swap it for another
||||||||| identical cpu, gave up, upgraded mobo and cpu.
||||||||| There have been reports of the occasional problems with
||||||||| various hardware and AMD, though this was some years ago,
||||||||| where
||||||||| seemingly with identical hardware one would have a conflict
||||||||| and the other wouldnt.
||||||||| I got into some deep conversations with BT and AMD over this
||||||||| issue.
||||||||
|||||||| BT ? - who are they ?
|||||||| I would really like for MS to be involved. After all, it is
|||||||| Windows 2000 which is going wrong and failing to provide an
|||||||| error message. I'll certainly have words with AMD support, who
|||||||| I expect will refer me to Gigabyte, who in turn will either
|||||||| ignore me or refer me elsewhere.
|||||||| The question is: if I were to go out and buy another GA-7VRXP
|||||||| m/board, AMD XP2400 processor, and a fresh shrink-wrapped copy
|||||||| of Windows 2000 would it all work ?
|||||||| Kevin.
||||||||
||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||| news:c6eqjg$43g$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||| I've changed mobo's and cpu's on many Win2K setups the only
||||||||||| one
||||||||||| I had trouble with was a1.3Duron, and that was an heat
||||||||||| problem, even using OTT coolers - never got to the bottom of
||||||||||| it!!
|||||||||||
||||||||||| When I mentioned entering the bios I meant was the new cpu
||||||||||| being correctly identified
||||||||||
|||||||||| Yes - the BIOS identifies both the Duron 650 and the XP2400
|||||||||| correctly. In the Windows Me installation which works with
|||||||||| either processor (I swap HDs) I have a few utilities which
|||||||||| can run
|||||||||| system identification and
||||||||| benchmarking -
|||||||||| everything shows up correctly with all of them. What I don't
|||||||||| have is any software to fully test out a CPU. I can identify
|||||||||| it, burn it in and benchmark it - but not fully test it, the
|||||||||| whole works - all instructions, caches, pipelines,
|||||||||| everything.
|||||||||| I think that
|||||||||| this would have to be my next step short of actually buying
|||||||||| another XP2400 (ouch - my poor wallet). I guess there isn't a
|||||||||| special way you have
|||||||||| to install Windows 2000 on an XP processor because of the SSE
|||||||||| instructions, is there ?
|||||||||| TIA
|||||||||| Kevin.
||||||||||
||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||| news:c6deah$s2r$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||||| Sorry missed the line about mobo;
|||||||||||| No worries, mate, it was early on in the thread. ;-)
||||||||||||| With mobo switches on auto, Boots/Runs OK with Duran. -
||||||||||||| yes?
|||||||||||| Oh yes, yes, yes. I can even play around with the FSB and
|||||||||||| multiplier switches and overclock the Duron 650 up to 897
|||||||||||| MHz and it still
|||||||||||| works fine. Solid processor, that Duron.
||||||||||||| Matrox drivers installed for win2k? - yes?
|||||||||||| Well, no they weren't. Matrox cards do the standard VESA
|||||||||||| modes properly so they are fine with Windows 'generic VGA
|||||||||||| card' drivers.
|||||||||||| I have now tried installing the latest Matrox drivers and
|||||||||||| guess what ? - no change.
||||||||||||| Change the cpu, restart, enter the bios and check
||||||||||||| settings, eg cpu.
|||||||||||| I've tried this, with the settings on auto and with the
|||||||||||| settings forcing the correct FSB and multiplier. I've even
|||||||||||| tried underclocking the XP2400 a bit. Still no change -
|||||||||||| works fine in Windows Me and hangs at Windows 2000 startup.
||||||||||||| If OK reboot from win2k installation disk ( you may have
||||||||||||| to enable boot from cd in bios) and repair.
|||||||||||| Tried this and of course the repair installation hangs
|||||||||||| after the 'Starting Windows' progress bar again. Had to
|||||||||||| swap back
|||||||||||| to the Duron 650 to get that to finish again.
||||||||||||| Other than that you appear to have covered everything.
|||||||||||| That's what I thought, but there is still a problem. The
|||||||||||| way things are going I might be better off using this PC as
|||||||||||| landfill and 'cover everything' with concrete !
||||||||||||| Good luck
|||||||||||| I think I need more than luck - I need a miracle. At
|||||||||||| least, I could do with some decent diagnostics out of
|||||||||||| Windows 2000. I don't really want to have to spend the
|||||||||||| rest of my life trying to edit video on a Duron 650.
|||||||||||| Thanks for the help.
|||||||||||| Kevin.
||||||||||||
||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||||| news:c61h6v$r0f$1@titan.btinternet.com...
|||||||||||||| Sorry- I though that was known. The motherboard is a
|||||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP (I have tried two samples) Rev1.1, as
|||||||||||||| staed in my original post which is still at the foot of
|||||||||||||| this thread. Originally I left the m/board switches for
|||||||||||||| FSB and multiplier in the 'auto' setting, as was the
|||||||||||||| memory bus clock. Since
|||||||||||||| then I've tried slowing things down from 133 MHz to 100
|||||||||||||| MHz on the FSB (effectively 266 -> 200 due to DDR), and
|||||||||||||| from 166 MHz to 133 MHz then 100 MHz on the memory bus
|||||||||||||| clock (DDR = 333 -> 266 -> 200). Same result every time
|||||||||||||| - problem persists.
|||||||||||||| M/board BIOS is 'F12', which is the latest on the
|||||||||||||| Gigabyte web site. Not too sure what else I can adjust
|||||||||||||| without doing damage. Kevin.
||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||||||| If I understand correctly;
||||||||||||||| Using Duran, win2k installed and booted correctly
||||||||||||||| With XP2400 it wouldnt boot ( Win98 is I believe
||||||||||||||| slightly more hardware 'fault' tolerant)
||||||||||||||| If this is the case might suggest a mobo setting, with
||||||||||||||| this cpu, or possibly bios update required.
||||||||||||||| What is the mobo?
|||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||||||| news:c60fh8$dc7$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
|||||||||||||||| I'm on about as mininal as the system can go anyway,
|||||||||||||||| the only card being the Matrix G400 graphics card.
|||||||||||||||| I've tried swapping every system component individually
|||||||||||||||| for a replacement - except for the processor (expensive
|||||||||||||||| !). The
|||||||||||||||| same result every time - the system hangs when the
|||||||||||||||| 'Starting Windows' progress bar completes. With a fresh
|||||||||||||||| install, this
|||||||||||||||| is as far as I can get - the install
|||||||||||||||| hasn't completed sufficiently to give me any 'recovery'
|||||||||||||||| options.
|||||||||||||||| I did try swapping out the XP2400 processor for an old
|||||||||||||||| Duron 650 - and it worked fine ! Problem with that is
|||||||||||||||| that the Duron 650 doesn't give enough performance for
|||||||||||||||| the video editing I'm
|||||||||||||||| planning to do.
|||||||||||||||| After the system was fully working with the Duron 650 I
|||||||||||||||| went back to the XP2400 and the problem re-emerged just
|||||||||||||||| the same.
|||||||||||||||| I also tried installing Windows Me and that runs on the
|||||||||||||||| XP2400 fine, so I'm not inclined to blame the
|||||||||||||||| processor. Could there be something which Windows 2000
|||||||||||||||| is doing with the XP2400 which doesn't happen with a
|||||||||||||||| different
|||||||||||||||| processor or op system ?
|||||||||||||||| I'm really confused with this - any help gratefully
|||||||||||||||| appreciated. Kevin.
||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||| DL <> wrote:
||||||||||||||||| Tried installing to min sys, Monitor, KeyB, mouse,cd -
||||||||||||||||| no cards, extra hardware
||||||||||||||||| and or with a single DDR?
|||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||| "Kevin Lawton" <> wrote in message
||||||||||||||||| news:15bf201c41b60$b9c8a000$a601280a@phx.gbl...
|||||||||||||||||| I've just installed Windows 2000 onto a new machine
|||||||||||||||||| and it hangs indefinitely when the 'Starting Windows'
|||||||||||||||||| progress bar completes. No error messages or
|||||||||||||||||| re-boots - it just hangs. Machine spec:
|||||||||||||||||| AMD XP2400 processor,
|||||||||||||||||| Gigabyte GA-7VRXP m/board,
|||||||||||||||||| 2 x 256 Mb DDR PC2700 RAM,
|||||||||||||||||| 330w PSU,
|||||||||||||||||| Seagate 60 Gb HDD.
|||||||||||||||||| The m/board, memory and HDD have been swapped-out
|||||||||||||||||| with no change in result. The system can boot into
|||||||||||||||||| DOS, from either floppy or HD fine.
|||||||||||||||||| I think I might have seen similar problems reported
|||||||||||||||||| before, but don't recall seeing any solution.
|||||||||||||||||| Please help.
|||||||||||||||||| Regards,
|||||||||||||||||| Kevin.
!