I have a 1.1 celeron running on a cognac mother board. I understand this is a POS but i my core voltage with not go above 1.520. The processor is a 1.75v. With the original 533 i connected vid3 to the vss and bump the core voltage from 1.488 to 1.520 but the voltage should have gone to 1.95. Is the a problem with the stock PSU? Have the lasted bios. And it has the pll isc-9250b set for 100mhz fsb.
Are you having problems with stability or just looking at the bios/monitor and thinking Hmm....
If your not having problems then I honestly wouldn't worry.
as far as the system goes this is a server set up in my dorm. i have a self built asus-k8n sli deluxe thanx for the offer on the p4 though. But i was attempting to overclock the 1.1 and i cant get the voltage to past 1.5. Just wondering I really dont care about this terd just wanted to overclock on a crap system b4 messing with my clawhammer.
as far as the system goes this is a server set up in my dorm. i have a self built asus-k8n sli deluxe thanx for the offer on the p4 though. But i was attempting to overclock the 1.1 and i cant get the voltage to past 1.5. Just wondering I really dont care about this terd just wanted to overclock on a crap system b4 messing with my clawhammer.
Water conducts electricity so I would try spraying water on the CPU. This should give the Celeron the boost in Voltage it needs.
disclaimer: Use of this advice may cause death and destruction. Whenever spraying water on electrical devices be sure to wear the proper safety equipment and avoid grounds.
I have a 1.1 celeron running on a cognac mother board. I understand this is a POS but i my core voltage with not go above 1.520. The processor is a 1.75v. With the original 533 i connected vid3 to the vss and bump the core voltage from 1.488 to 1.520 but the voltage should have gone to 1.95. Is the a problem with the stock PSU? Have the lasted bios. And it has the pll isc-9250b set for 100mhz fsb.
I see everyone is being more than helpful, as usual.
First of all, is this a Coppermine Celeron, or a Tualatin that we're dealing with? What is the chipset found on this Cognac board?
The coppermines are only so-so overclockers, especially at the "high" frequencies like 1.1ghz. I have a 1.3a Celeron overclocked to 1.5ghz on 1.65v, running Windows Xp like a champ, never a hiccup.
While I'm sure you aren't interested investing more money into dead technology, the tualatins are much better at this sort of thing than the coppermines.
The coppermines are only so-so overclockers, especially at the "high" frequencies like 1.1ghz. I have a 1.3a Celeron overclocked to 1.5ghz on 1.65v, running Windows Xp like a champ, never a hiccup.
While I'm sure you aren't interested investing more money into dead technology, the tualatins are much better at this sort of thing than the coppermines.
-The String
As he said, don't bother if it's a Coppermine. You're already maxed out when it comes to possible clock speed.
The coppermines are only so-so overclockers, especially at the "high" frequencies like 1.1ghz. I have a 1.3a Celeron overclocked to 1.5ghz on 1.65v, running Windows Xp like a champ, never a hiccup.
While I'm sure you aren't interested investing more money into dead technology, the tualatins are much better at this sort of thing than the coppermines.
-The String
I run my 1.3 @ 1648/1.65v and it's suprisingly quick. The highest i could run it fairly stable was 1675(hit 1700 once for Suicide-Shot)damn AGP/PCI. Did the pin-mod for 133FSB, but even with the pin-mod for >volts, it wouldn't boot. :x Still going strong after a few years, and overclocked the whole time.
I will say I have always been impressed with how the late PIII based Celerons performed. Not really a gamers delight, but they did everything else within earshot of their big brothers, and even outperformed the AMD competition from time to time. I think you summed it up nicely with "surprisingly quick", and I would certainly back that up! If only my chip could keep pace with yours... 8)
I will say I have always been impressed with how the late PIII based Celerons performed. Not really a gamers delight, but they did everything else within earshot of their big brothers, and even outperformed the AMD competition from time to time. I think you summed it up nicely with "surprisingly quick", and I would certainly back that up! If only my chip could keep pace with yours... 8)
-The String
I have a 1.2 Celly, 1.3 Celly, and a 1.2 PIII. If i O/C the 1.2 to 1320(110FSB), the 1.3@ stock still benches a bit better(go figure), with the same RAM timings..2-2-2, plus the 110FSB vs. 100.. Very weird. :? The PIII is unbelievably cool running.
As long as they were the 800MHz and higher Celerons, they were fairly decent. My first self-purchased computer had an 800mHz celeron. I didn't know more than the basics about computers at the time; I lucked out and just happened to get a decent Celeron system. I got plenty of use out of that computer.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.