Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Anyone know why the HD presentation is delayed 1 hour on NBC? Are they
converting something or does it take longer to transmitt?
Thanks,
Clark
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Donno - but there is a national HD feed (CH-148 on Dish) that is on a 5
hour delay. I wonder why no real time as well. Eeeesh.
Clark wrote:
> Anyone know why the HD presentation is delayed 1 hour on NBC? Are they
> converting something or does it take longer to transmitt?
>
> Thanks,
> Clark
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Clark wrote:
>
> Anyone know why the HD presentation is delayed 1 hour on NBC? Are they
> converting something or does it take longer to transmitt?
>
I don't know either. But the feed isn't identical to the
standard feed. Some of the camera angles are different and
they are using different announcers.
Regards, Daniel
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
| danielmbarton@yahoo.com |
--------------------------------------------------------------
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
darn they are delaying the directv olympics by a whole day
End higher ticket prices! Go to local college games!
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Why on earth can't NBC find more than 2 HD commercials? The
Sony one was played at least 15 times and the Greek montage
at least 5. I got tired of counting them!
Daniel
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
| danielmbarton@yahoo.com |
--------------------------------------------------------------
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Daniel Barton (danielmbarton@yahoo.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> I don't know either. But the feed isn't identical to the
> standard feed. Some of the camera angles are different and
> they are using different announcers.
I hate to bring up the fact that NBC's 24/7 HD Olympics on their digital
channels violates FCC regs if they don't have another sub-channel showing
the "regular" programming.
Stations at full power on digital are required to have a large percentage
of their digital and analog be the same content...large enough so that
just a few hours a day matching won't cut it.
--
Jeff Rife | "I have a question that could affect our entire
SPAM bait: | relationship...did you kill Coach Mattay?"
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov | "No!"
spam@ftc.gov | "But, you did dress him up like a woman...?"
| "Yeah."
| "Just checking."
| -- Alex Lambert and Brian Hackett, "Wings"
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
nbc got the fcc to relax the simulcast rules during the olympics btw
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Daniel Barton <danielmbarton@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Why on earth can't NBC find more than 2 HD commercials? The
>Sony one was played at least 15 times and the Greek montage
>at least 5. I got tired of counting them!
>
>Daniel
And the Sony commercial isn't even HD. Just widescreen SD. Same sort
of thing PBS runs half the time on their "HD" feed.
I'm not sure, but it also looked to me as though a few of the cameras
they're using aren't HD either. Or maybe they just weren't quite in
focus.
Del Mibbler <mibbler@nycap.rr.com>
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Mistress wrote:
> I was holding my tongue; I totally agree. We found ourselves mocking
> the coverage rather than being awed.
So did we. "That's real water!" became a catchphrase we repeated after
every inane, bubble-headed thing Al and Mary said. The writers share
some of the blame, and as events like the Macy's parade demonstrate,
sometimes there's simply nothing intelligent to say. But Al and Mary
often read their scripts without betraying any comprehension of what
they were saying, and their extemporaneous remarks were reliably vapid.
The cultural wasteland impression wasn't helped by the child-unfriendly
promos for NBC's fall lineup of CSI and Miami Vice ripoffs and the mind-
numbing repetition of the Sony ad and the aerial footage.
The HD images, although beautiful, were weighted toward static, large
scale, wide-angle shots. There was nothing comparable to the intimacy
of the SD shots from, for example, beneath the olympic flag as it was
carried around the stadium.
Regarding the repeated 15 minutes of 'S' countries, I suspect that
wasn't accidental. They needed it in order to stretch the HD coverage
to 4 hours. (Note that we didn't appear to miss anything.) The SD
coverage spent the final half hour interviewing U.S. basketball players
on the floor of the stadium.
It appears that NBC has learned absolutely nothing since the Salt Lake
City HD broadcast in 2002, which suffered from precisely the same
problems: limited, day-late coverage, amateurish production, B-team
commentary, superfluous, repetitious filler...the coverage is more like
an HD demo than the broadcast of an actual event.
- Ernie http://home.comcast.net/~erniew
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Well it looks they are going to repeatly show the opening ceremonies until 3
am Sunday morning. Then it looks like some delayed events start. Seems
like a 24 hour delay.
Clark
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
<< "That's real water!" became a catchphrase we repeated after
every inane, bubble-headed thing Al and Mary said. The writers share
some of the blame, and as events like the Macy's parade demonstrate,
sometimes there's simply nothing intelligent to say. But Al and Mary
often read their scripts without betraying any comprehension of what
they were saying, and their extemporaneous remarks were reliably vapid.>>
You are so right that sometimes there is nothing intelligent to say. But in
those cases, the announcers would be wise to follow the lead of Chris Berman
during the telecast of of the game in which Cal Ripken broke Lou Gehrig's
consecutive games record: for well over two minutes he said nothing and let
the pictures do the talking.
Lee
--
To e-mail, replace "bucketofspam" with "dleegordon"
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Though I didn't see 2002 Winter Olymptics in HD, but if it was like
what we are seeing this summer as you said, then I didn't miss much.
What a disappointment!
When can they produce eveything in HD and downconvert for the other
viewers?
It is a hard choice to make when we are forced to pick between good
pictures vs. good contents.
Ernie Wright <erniew@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<QZudnfIzD7fKx4PcRVn-ig@comcast.com>...
> It appears that NBC has learned absolutely nothing since the Salt Lake
> City HD broadcast in 2002, which suffered from precisely the same
> problems: limited, day-late coverage, amateurish production, B-team
> commentary, superfluous, repetitious filler...the coverage is more like
> an HD demo than the broadcast of an actual event.
>
> - Ernie http://home.comcast.net/~erniew
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Ernie Wright wrote:
> The HD images, although beautiful, were weighted toward static, large
> scale, wide-angle shots. There was nothing comparable to the intimacy
> of the SD shots....
Nothing has changes since the Winter Olympics in 2002.
Steve
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Caloonese (caloonese@yahoo.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> It is a hard choice to make when we are forced to pick between good
> pictures vs. good contents.
The worst part is choosing between watching some "important" event live
(or close to live) on SD or waiting over 24 hours (after you almost
certainly know the outcome) for HD.
If ABC can put 20+ HD cameras at the SuperBowl (along with 20 more SD
cameras), all with full special effects available, then you'd think NBC
could put 5 HD cameras on each of 4 events at the Olympics, and fill in
with some SD. I'd much rather have no delay in the HD and live with a
few SD shots thrown in.
As it is, I probably won't watch even a minute of HD Olympics.
--
Jeff Rife | "One minute we were spanking each other with
SPAM bait: | meat, and the next minute it got weird."
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov |
spam@ftc.gov | -- Joe Hackett, "Wings"
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jeff Rife wrote:
> If ABC can put 20+ HD cameras at the SuperBowl (along with 20 more SD
> cameras), all with full special effects available, then you'd think
> NBC could put 5 HD cameras on each of 4 events at the Olympics, and
> fill in with some SD. I'd much rather have no delay in the HD and
> live with a few SD shots thrown in.
Me too. I find I'm missing even the silly things like the flags
superimposed electronically on the swimming lanes.
After doing some more research on how TV is produced at the Olympics,
I'm prepared to shift some of the blame from NBC to the IOC and the host
committee. The host provides the cameras and a central facility from
which all of the world's TV networks receive picture and sound. So it's
the host that's providing HD at a limited number of venues, and some of
the other problems may stem from inadequacies of the HD facilities made
available by the host.
NBC has reportedly said that the 2006 winter games will be different,
that HD cameras will be at every event and the SD broadcast will be a
downconversion of the HD, with a single set of commentators.
But NBC still failed to make a commitment to HD this time around. The
studio where Bob Costas and the other anchors sit could have been HD, as
could the athlete profiles and other non-event footage. Including that
stuff in the HD feed would have made it seem more like a broadcast and
less like a demo channel. NBC appears to be simply passing through the
HD pictures provided by Athens Olympic Broadcasting (AOB).
I think NBC's excuse for not producing any HD content themselves is that
it wasn't clear AOB would produce any HD until very late, and by that
time NBC couldn't gear up any HD production. I don't know whether I buy
that, though.
> As it is, I probably won't watch even a minute of HD Olympics.
I find I'm watching it during the day, when I don't think I'm missing
anything on the--what is it, six?--SD channels. It's like a higher
quality not-so-instant replay.
But I'm not sure how much longer I can stand the Sony ad.
- Ernie http://home.comcast.net/~erniew
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
"Ernie Wright" <erniew@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:QZudnfIzD7fKx4PcRVn-ig@comcast.com...
> It appears that NBC has learned absolutely nothing since the Salt Lake
> City HD broadcast in 2002, which suffered from precisely the same
> problems: limited, day-late coverage, amateurish production, B-team
> commentary, superfluous, repetitious filler...the coverage is more like
> an HD demo than the broadcast of an actual event.
I would have to agree. NBC is currently showing event coverage
on HD that I already saw yesterday of SD. I have switched to SD
as it is obvious that NBC does not know what they are doing
when it comes to HD. There should be no reason for them to
be showing different coverage on SD versus HD.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
I remember when I was a small kid back in 1963 and our family got its'
first color TV set.....
Back then only about 1 program in 5 was in color.People who had color
sets were complaining about the lack of color programming.Now,100% is
color and black and white is just a chic fad for "nostalgic" look-back
programs.
It is the same thing with high definition.It is a fairly new phenomenon
and only about 18-20% of the current TV households have HD
capability.Give it time.I suspect as more households acquire the TV's
necessary for it and demand increases,so will the infrastructure for
HD.In about 5-7 years this talk about how poorly a broadcaster is
utilizing HD capability will be "old hat." Of course,you early adopters
have always been an impatient lot.......
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jeff Rife wrote:
> ...
> As it is, I probably won't watch even a minute of HD Olympics.
Hi Jeff,
This means that any Olympics that you do watch (in SD) will include the
commercials associated with that broadcast. I think that is precisely
the reason for the delay. The Olympics are NOT an event being simulcast
in SD and HD - as, for example, Monday Night Football IS!
The Olympics are actually TWO different broadcasts with different video,
different talking heads, and DIFFERENT sponsors - and certainly
different potential viewing audiences.
If you and I were one of the sponsors of the (SD) Olympics I suspect the
idea that the network was providing a competing product that could do
nothing but reduce the size of our potential viewing audience would not
sit well with us - and the demographics of that "lost" HD audience would
include, I suspect, greater disposable income, etc.
IMHO this is the reason for the delay between the SD version and the HD
version of the Olympics.
Jerry
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Ernie Wright wrote:
> ...
> NBC has reportedly said that the 2006 winter games will be different,
> that HD cameras will be at every event and the SD broadcast will be a
> downconversion of the HD, with a single set of commentators.
> ...
Ernie,
And when this occurs I suspect that we will have both the HD and SD
versions available at the same time - with the same commercials!
Jerry
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Mark Jones wrote:
> ...There should be no reason for them to
> be showing different coverage on SD versus HD.
Mark,
This would seem true if it were not for the significant costs associated
with replacing all of the cameras and electronics for ALL cameras at all
venues. Heck, with "small" sporting events like Monday Night Football
it is taking a long time to get from "lots of HD" to "total HD."
I assume with time that we'll see events like this shot with hD
equipment and transmitted as HD as well as SD - until SD is phased out.
Jerry
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jsheldon wrote:
> This would seem true if it were not for the significant costs
> associated with replacing all of the cameras and electronics for ALL
> cameras at all venues.
The cameras and electronics were purchased or constructed specifically
for the Olympics. The *venues* were built for the Olympics. There's no
replacement involved.
They had an opportunity to build a state-of-the-art facility for TV and
simply chose not to.
- Ernie http://home.comcast.net/~erniew
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Ernie Wright <erniew@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<QZudnfIzD7fKx4PcRVn-ig@comcast.com>...
> It appears that NBC has learned absolutely nothing since the Salt Lake
> City HD broadcast in 2002, which suffered from precisely the same
> problems: limited, day-late coverage, amateurish production, B-team
> commentary, superfluous, repetitious filler...the coverage is more like
> an HD demo than the broadcast of an actual event.
I could not have said it better myself. Clearly NBCs HD coverage for
the Olympics is simply being used by the network as OTJ training for
their minor-league staff and some interns.
How hard would it be to put HD cameras in the same venues as the SD
cameras and broadcast the A-team announcers with Grade-A Video footage
on the HD feed while broadcasting the SAME A-team announcers with good
SD-footage for the normal feed?
And then yes, PLEASE upscan the SD advertisements so we don't have to
endure chips and salsa any more. Jeez.
What an incredible joke this is. NBC is a laughingstock.
-Laird
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jsheldon (jsheldonNOTTTHIS@his.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> This means that any Olympics that you do watch (in SD) will include the
> commercials associated with that broadcast. I think that is precisely
> the reason for the delay. The Olympics are NOT an event being simulcast
> in SD and HD - as, for example, Monday Night Football IS!
Right, but there is no reason they cannot be, since even the "live" coverage
is quite often delayed by as much as an hour.
--
Jeff Rife | "I've never understood the female capacity to
SPAM bait: | avoid a direct answer to any question."
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov |
spam@ftc.gov | -- Mr. Spock, "This Side of Paradise"
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
"LCW" <laird@l-n-l.com> wrote in message
news
7593985.0408151813.2629d5ca@posting.google.com...
> I could not have said it better myself. Clearly NBCs HD coverage for
> the Olympics is simply being used by the network as OTJ training for
> their minor-league staff and some interns.
>
> How hard would it be to put HD cameras in the same venues as the SD
> cameras and broadcast the A-team announcers with Grade-A Video footage
> on the HD feed while broadcasting the SAME A-team announcers with good
> SD-footage for the normal feed?
>
> And then yes, PLEASE upscan the SD advertisements so we don't have to
> endure chips and salsa any more. Jeez.
>
> What an incredible joke this is. NBC is a laughingstock.
They need to hire someone who has a clue. They certainly
don't have a clue at this point.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jeff Rife wrote:
> Right, but there is no reason they cannot be, since even the "live" coverage
> is quite often delayed by as much as an hour.
>
Jeff,
The point is that they want the HD version to be delayed re the SD
version. Real time has nothing to do with it.
Jerry
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Ernie Wright wrote:
> ... There's no replacement involved.
Err, there clearly IS!
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Mark Jones wrote:
> ...
> I haven't been watching much coverage because this whole
> thing pisses me off.
Dumb ol' corporate america.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Daniel Barton wrote:
> Why on earth can't NBC find more than 2 HD commercials? The
> Sony one was played at least 15 times and the Greek montage
> at least 5. I got tired of counting them!
I'm glad that they can find only a few advertisements. Now, if we could only
get them to play them less frequently, that means MORE PROGRAM for us. ;-)
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jsheldon wrote:
>> ... There's no replacement involved.
>
> Err, there clearly IS!
Err, maybe you could clarify what replacement you think would have been
involved.
As I said, the venues and the TV equipment are new, built or acquired
specifically for this event. There was nothing to replace.
- Ernie http://home.comcast.net/~erniew
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jsheldon (jsheldonNOTTTHIS@his.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> The point is that they want the HD version to be delayed re the SD
> version. Real time has nothing to do with it.
The actual point is that NBC doesn't have a clue. There is no good reason
for them to "want the HD version to be delayed" in *any* way.
Since the SD version is delayed already, NBC can't use the "it's hard to
produce HD" excuse.
And, since every other network seems to be able to do simulcasts of events
with many HD cameras, NBC shouldn't have any problem.
The worst part of this is that unlike the Super Bowl, with the Olympics,
we are stuck for many years with a network that just doesn't understand
how to do live events. The Super Bowl keeps getting better precisely
because each network wants to "one-up" the last one...every year there is
at least some improvement. Meanwhile, NBC hasn't gotten any better even
though they have have 4 years to plan this.
--
Jeff Rife | "A rabbit's foot? You slaughtered an innocent
SPAM bait: | animal for some silly superstition?"
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov | "I didn't personally slaughter the rabbit. I shot
spam@ftc.gov | a giant panda out of a tree, and he fell on it."
| -- "Cybill"
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
In Chicago, we are getting 24/7 HD coverage of the Olympics with
minimal commercial interruption. I for one am grateful to NBC. They
can't be making a penny from the HD coverage they are providing on
their DTV channels.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:59:40 -0400, Jeff Rife <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote:
>Jsheldon (jsheldonNOTTTHIS@his.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
>> The point is that they want the HD version to be delayed re the SD
>> version. Real time has nothing to do with it.
>
>The actual point is that NBC doesn't have a clue. There is no good reason
>for them to "want the HD version to be delayed" in *any* way.
>
>Since the SD version is delayed already, NBC can't use the "it's hard to
>produce HD" excuse.
>
>And, since every other network seems to be able to do simulcasts of events
>with many HD cameras, NBC shouldn't have any problem.
>
>The worst part of this is that unlike the Super Bowl, with the Olympics,
>we are stuck for many years with a network that just doesn't understand
>how to do live events. The Super Bowl keeps getting better precisely
>because each network wants to "one-up" the last one...every year there is
>at least some improvement. Meanwhile, NBC hasn't gotten any better even
>though they have have 4 years to plan this.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Garth (garth09@rcn.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> In Chicago, we are getting 24/7 HD coverage of the Olympics with
> minimal commercial interruption.
Are you getting a different feed than everyone else? We are getting an
8/7 feed repeated 3 times each day.
> They
> can't be making a penny from the HD coverage they are providing on
> their DTV channels.
And ABC didn't make any extra money from the HDTV presentation of the
Super Bowl, nor will Fox, CBS, and ABC make any extra money from the HD
broadcasts of the NFL regular season games, etc. Yet, we get all those
with the "first string" announcers and no delay compared to the SD
version.
--
Jeff Rife | "Only one human captain has ever survived battle
SPAM bait: | with a Minbari fleet...he is behind me...you are
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov | in front of me. If you value your lives,
spam@ftc.gov | be somewhere else."
| -- Ambassador Delenn, 2260
There are 442 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

