Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

at last! Mac OS on a PC

Last response: in Windows XP
Share
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 1:04:35 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4

More about : mac

March 11, 2005 1:04:36 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

"Kenny S" <hotmail@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23hkxgxaJFHA.2980@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>
Good now windows users using an emulator will now be able to grip about no
software for there emulator!
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 1:04:36 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

Kenny S wrote:
> http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4

http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,66847,00.html

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
Related resources
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 1:04:36 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

Kenny S wrote:
> http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4

Isn't that much like putting a pig on lipstick?
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 1:04:36 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

If you were to read up more about this, the "author" is now being accused of
"selling" a remarked Open Source package.

http://www.betanews.com/article/CherryOS_Mac_Emulator_R...



"Kenny S" <hotmail@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23hkxgxaJFHA.2980@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 1:04:37 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

There is actually software that isn't already available for Windows? <grin>

Rich wrote:

> "Kenny S" <hotmail@coldmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23hkxgxaJFHA.2980@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
>>http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>>
>
> Good now windows users using an emulator will now be able to grip about no
> software for there emulator!
>
>
>
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 1:04:37 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

Humm, $180 USD to run Mac software on a Windows box?!??! I think not!

JerryMouse wrote:
> Kenny S wrote:
>
>>http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>
>
> Isn't that much like putting a pig on lipstick?
>
>
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 1:52:01 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:51:10 -0600, Bob I wrote:
>
> Humm, $180 USD to run Mac software on a Windows box?!??! I think not!

The only "mac" software I run is Photoshop and PageMaker, and they bot run
faster on my PC than the Mac, so there's no reason to load that
exploitable OS/X on a Windows PC.

>
> JerryMouse wrote:
>> Kenny S wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>>
>>
>> Isn't that much like putting a pig on lipstick?
>>
>>


--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me
March 11, 2005 1:52:02 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

And what may I ask is the value of this.

Generally for a product to 'sell' it needs:
1. Features
2. Functions
3. Benefits

So I grant that OSX on Windows is a feature....now as for 2 and 3.....*#!

"Leythos" wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:51:10 -0600, Bob I wrote:
> >
> > Humm, $180 USD to run Mac software on a Windows box?!??! I think not!
>
> The only "mac" software I run is Photoshop and PageMaker, and they bot run
> faster on my PC than the Mac, so there's no reason to load that
> exploitable OS/X on a Windows PC.
>
> >
> > JerryMouse wrote:
> >> Kenny S wrote:
> >>
> >>>http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
> >>
> >>
> >> Isn't that much like putting a pig on lipstick?
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> spam999free@rrohio.com
> remove 999 in order to email me
>
>
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 2:22:13 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:23:03 -0800, BAR wrote:
>
> And what may I ask is the value of this.
>
> Generally for a product to 'sell' it needs:
> 1. Features
> 2. Functions
> 3. Benefits
>
> So I grant that OSX on Windows is a feature....now as for 2 and 3.....*#!

Don't ask me - I see no value in the MAC based systems as most of the
good apps have been ported to Windows already.

--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 6:45:46 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Leythos wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:51:10 -0600, Bob I wrote:
>
>>Humm, $180 USD to run Mac software on a Windows box?!??! I think not!
>
>
> The only "mac" software I run is Photoshop and PageMaker, and they bot run
> faster on my PC than the Mac, so there's no reason to load that
> exploitable OS/X on a Windows PC.
>

How is OS/X any more exploitable than ony other OS? I haven't any
experience with it at all but I was under the impression from those that
do that it's pretty solid implementation of BSD-Linux, which has
historically been very security focussed, as I recall reading recently.

Steve
Anonymous
March 11, 2005 6:45:47 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

FreeBSD is known to be a robust os and that is where OSX is based from. The
most secure is Canadian based openbsd.
!