at last! Mac OS on a PC

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
R

Rich

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
943
0
18,980
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

"Kenny S" <hotmail@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23hkxgxaJFHA.2980@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>
Good now windows users using an emulator will now be able to grip about no
software for there emulator!
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

Kenny S wrote:
> http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4

http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,66847,00.html

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

If you were to read up more about this, the "author" is now being accused of
"selling" a remarked Open Source package.

http://www.betanews.com/article/CherryOS_Mac_Emulator_Resurfaces/1110330890



"Kenny S" <hotmail@coldmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23hkxgxaJFHA.2980@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

There is actually software that isn't already available for Windows? <grin>

Rich wrote:

> "Kenny S" <hotmail@coldmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23hkxgxaJFHA.2980@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
>>http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>>
>
> Good now windows users using an emulator will now be able to grip about no
> software for there emulator!
>
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

Humm, $180 USD to run Mac software on a Windows box?!??! I think not!

JerryMouse wrote:
> Kenny S wrote:
>
>>http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>
>
> Isn't that much like putting a pig on lipstick?
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:51:10 -0600, Bob I wrote:
>
> Humm, $180 USD to run Mac software on a Windows box?!??! I think not!

The only "mac" software I run is Photoshop and PageMaker, and they bot run
faster on my PC than the Mac, so there's no reason to load that
exploitable OS/X on a Windows PC.

>
> JerryMouse wrote:
>> Kenny S wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
>>
>>
>> Isn't that much like putting a pig on lipstick?
>>
>>


--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me
 
B

bar

Distinguished
Apr 10, 2004
1,144
0
19,280
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

And what may I ask is the value of this.

Generally for a product to 'sell' it needs:
1. Features
2. Functions
3. Benefits

So I grant that OSX on Windows is a feature....now as for 2 and 3.....*#!

"Leythos" wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:51:10 -0600, Bob I wrote:
> >
> > Humm, $180 USD to run Mac software on a Windows box?!??! I think not!
>
> The only "mac" software I run is Photoshop and PageMaker, and they bot run
> faster on my PC than the Mac, so there's no reason to load that
> exploitable OS/X on a Windows PC.
>
> >
> > JerryMouse wrote:
> >> Kenny S wrote:
> >>
> >>>http://www.mxsinc.com/pages.php?cid=MDEwMDA4
> >>
> >>
> >> Isn't that much like putting a pig on lipstick?
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> spam999free@rrohio.com
> remove 999 in order to email me
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.gr.windows.client,microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics,microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support (More info?)

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:23:03 -0800, BAR wrote:
>
> And what may I ask is the value of this.
>
> Generally for a product to 'sell' it needs:
> 1. Features
> 2. Functions
> 3. Benefits
>
> So I grant that OSX on Windows is a feature....now as for 2 and 3.....*#!

Don't ask me - I see no value in the MAC based systems as most of the
good apps have been ported to Windows already.

--
spam999free@rrohio.com
remove 999 in order to email me
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

Leythos wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:51:10 -0600, Bob I wrote:
>
>>Humm, $180 USD to run Mac software on a Windows box?!??! I think not!
>
>
> The only "mac" software I run is Photoshop and PageMaker, and they bot run
> faster on my PC than the Mac, so there's no reason to load that
> exploitable OS/X on a Windows PC.
>

How is OS/X any more exploitable than ony other OS? I haven't any
experience with it at all but I was under the impression from those that
do that it's pretty solid implementation of BSD-Linux, which has
historically been very security focussed, as I recall reading recently.

Steve
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)

FreeBSD is known to be a robust os and that is where OSX is based from. The
most secure is Canadian based openbsd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom