Tom's Hardware > Forum > Home Theatre > HDTV > Which generation HD receiver do you have?

Which generation HD receiver do you have?

Forum Home Theatre : HDTV - Which generation HD receiver do you have?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

I have a 2003 Samsung HD TV with built-in HD tuner and it is LESS robust
(sensitive to signal issues) than a 2004 Samsung receiver I had an
opportunity to play with.

1)Overdrive (too much signal) will cause dropouts in the sound only in the
older tuner
2) Ghosts (multipath) will cause dropouts in pic and sound but the ghost has
to be much stronger in the newer set
3) The newer tuner is less affected by co-channel (skip of another signal on
the same freq).

It's really annoying as stations change their output for after dark and I
have problems, if the weather blows thru putting storm clouds between me and
the transmitter I have problems. Part of it is my fault as I have several
antennas mixed together. As long as the signal levels remain constant I
have stations from local and 60 miles away. If they change the ghosts
increase and I get dropouts.

Ch 3 is too strong as I have a antenna amp on the mast. But without the
antenna amp I loose two stations. Funny thing is that with the stations
that are further away I have NO problems (no ghosts are strong enough to
cause a problem).

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Jeff Rigby (jeffg212@comcast.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> 2) Ghosts (multipath) will cause dropouts in pic and sound but the ghost has
> to be much stronger in the newer set

How do you know that multipath is the problem? Have you tested the signal
with a spectrum analyzer?

--
Jeff Rife |
SPAM bait: | http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/OverTheHedge/HDTV.gif
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov |
spam@ftc.gov |

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

"Jeff Rife" <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b8af934a38a1a8d9897b1@news.nabs.net...
> Jeff Rigby (jeffg212@comcast.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> > 2) Ghosts (multipath) will cause dropouts in pic and sound but the ghost
has
> > to be much stronger in the newer set
>
> How do you know that multipath is the problem? Have you tested the signal
> with a spectrum analyzer?
>
No, I have a 20 db attenuator on the second antenna that I have to adj for
the dropouts to stop ( about 10 db ). When looking at the analog channels
you see the ghosts from the second antenna attenuate as I reduce the signal
from the second antenna. The newer set requires less attenuation than the
older set.

The problem seems to be aggravated with the stronger stations, which makes
sense since ghosts are more of a problem with stronger stations. I've
tried everything, the only thing that holds any hope is to filter out the
local channels received on ant 1 from ant 2 with trap filters. Looks like a
nice project.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Jeff Rigby (jeffg212@comcast.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> No, I have a 20 db attenuator on the second antenna that I have to adj for
> the dropouts to stop ( about 10 db ). When looking at the analog channels
> you see the ghosts from the second antenna attenuate as I reduce the signal
> from the second antenna. The newer set requires less attenuation than the
> older set.

Unless the analog channels are the adjacent to the digital, I'd say that
you still don't know anything.

Even so, I have a channel 50 analog that is snowy and ghost-laden, but the
channel 51 digital from the same tower (it's the same station) is pretty
close to perfect. So, ghosts on analog don't tell you much about multipath
on digital.

--
Jeff Rife | "I don't have to be Ray Liotta: movie star,
SPAM bait: | anymore. I can be Ray Liotta: Maya's boyfriend.
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov | All I want to do is regular, boring, ordinary
spam@ftc.gov | couple things."
| "Then you, sir, have hit the soul-mate lottery."
| -- Ray Liotta and Nina Van Horn, "Just Shoot Me"

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

"Jeff Rife" <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b8c2b77f25663e79897b4@news.nabs.net...
> Jeff Rigby (jeffg212@comcast.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> > No, I have a 20 db attenuator on the second antenna that I have to adj
for
> > the dropouts to stop ( about 10 db ). When looking at the analog
channels
> > you see the ghosts from the second antenna attenuate as I reduce the
signal
> > from the second antenna. The newer set requires less attenuation than
the
> > older set.
>
> Unless the analog channels are the adjacent to the digital, I'd say that
> you still don't know anything.
>
> Even so, I have a channel 50 analog that is snowy and ghost-laden, but the
> channel 51 digital from the same tower (it's the same station) is pretty
> close to perfect. So, ghosts on analog don't tell you much about
multipath
> on digital.
>
Agreed, the point was that the NEWER set could display a HD picture when the
older set could not. And yes, several of the HD channels were adjacent in
freq to the analog channel. It's a classic test, the only other factor that
could be affecting the picture would be a distant station on the same freq,
which I checked. The only parameter I couldn't change was the time delay in
the ghost. So it matters WHICH receiver you have, a later model being
generally better at rejecting multipath and too strong a signal.

A different issue, WUSF ch 34 is broadcasting from Tampa but we have an
analog low power Christian station 3ABN (Three Angels Broadcast Network)
broadcasting here in Sarasota on the same channel 34. Of course that means
no Digital reception for WUSF here. 15 miles north of me my customers can
get WUSF digital.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Jeff Rigby (jeffg212@comcast.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> So it matters WHICH receiver you have

Agreed.

> a later model being
> generally better at rejecting multipath and too strong a signal.

This isn't really true. One of the best workhorses is the original RCA
DTC-100, and that is a second-generation receiver at best. I'd call it a
1st gen in some ways.

The MyHD MDP-100 is a 2nd or 3rd generation receiver, and it is better than
many 4th generation receivers. It probably isn't bad compared to the new
LG 5th-generation receiver.

--
Jeff Rife |
SPAM bait: | http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/FoxTrot/Blackboard.gif
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov |
spam@ftc.gov |

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

"Jeff Rigby" <jeffg212@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3KGdnSK8wLSwUb3cRVn-jA@comcast.com...
>I have a 2003 Samsung HD TV with built-in HD tuner and it is LESS robust
> (sensitive to signal issues) than a 2004 Samsung receiver I had an
> opportunity to play with.
>
> 1)Overdrive (too much signal) will cause dropouts in the sound only in the
> older tuner
> 2) Ghosts (multipath) will cause dropouts in pic and sound but the ghost
> has
> to be much stronger in the newer set
> 3) The newer tuner is less affected by co-channel (skip of another signal
> on
> the same freq).
>
> It's really annoying as stations change their output for after dark and I
> have problems, if the weather blows thru putting storm clouds between me
> and
> the transmitter I have problems. Part of it is my fault as I have several
> antennas mixed together. As long as the signal levels remain constant I
> have stations from local and 60 miles away. If they change the ghosts
> increase and I get dropouts.
>
> Ch 3 is too strong as I have a antenna amp on the mast. But without the
> antenna amp I loose two stations. Funny thing is that with the stations
> that are further away I have NO problems (no ghosts are strong enough to
> cause a problem).

If you are combining antennas you need to filter the bandwidth of the
individual antennas to the channel spectrum they are working at or you will
have multipath problems.

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Home Theatre > HDTV > Which generation HD receiver do you have?
Go to:

There are 731 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 demondrumer won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 tehue won the Freshman badge
  • 12:11 mi1ez won the Watchman badge
  • 01:00 sighQ2 won the Freshman badge
  • 09:06 ulysses35 won the CPUs badge
  • 01:00 fleeb won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 jaymoney61 won the Freshman badge
  • 07:06 amdfangirl won the Watchman badge
  • 01:00 benw won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 anmjoven won the Freshman badge