Intel chipsets vs AMD chipsets

Anyone knows what process technology Intel uses to produce their own chipsets internally and how does it compare from a process technology standpoint with AMD's chipsets which I believe still runs at foundry(ies) (UMC, TSMC?). Also if you have info on roadmaps for either company on what future plans they have for these products. Is AMD going to transfer their some of their chipstes internally?

Thanks much
X.

I cannot comment on wich process they do use.... I honestly do not know (although the poster above me is probably correct !) anyway it seems interesting to me that if he is correct why they would be behind the main CPU in process tech ? With AMD I can see it wouldnt be as much of a problem but on the Intel side it seems to me that they would want to match up the CPU and chipset better ?

Im interested to know if Intel switched to faster chipset chips on a better process would they be able to increase FSB ? Im sure some one here knows

975X is 130nm, as are the 955X and 945. Intel generally makes chipsets on the process node that's one size larger than most of their CPUs. This allows them to get yet more use out of the equipment.

You really need to look at the mobo's on case by case: for intel - nvidia are usually better for gaming and supposed a little faster - as far as raid i think nvidia is more stable but then again it depends on the mobo.

i build a lot of raid systems and the p5w-dh is rock solid raid with 975 but the p5dw2-e premium is not as stable with the same chip set. I have been running a raid10/0 for 6 months i have not had reset the raid once - even though i am running vista rc-1 on the raid 0 and had force many reboots due to program in compatibility

i think with amd its same the nvidia chip set is better - most the mobos i .
use all have nvida chipsets.

Sorry i mis read your question - well maybe this infor helps someone