http://media.corporate-ir.net/medi [...] e_list.pdf

I even did not notice that.
But the price cut only applied to Netburst processors.

i think they are house cleaning before they kill of the old lines of chips???

Sure

Intel will introduce new bargain dual-core and single-core processors based on Core Arch in the next two quarters. They should be competitive clock-to-clock with K8.

^^ mayn can't wait to see whut they come up with

but hopefully it won't be chips like the 4300...

800 FSB, not feelin that no more

Then you may be disappointed. The rumoured specifications of the upcoming bargain chips will only spot 800MHz FSB.

http://forumz.tomshardware.com/har [...] c&t=209632

What the hell makes you dislike 800FSB? The QX6700 suffers no bottlenecking and that's on a slightly faster 1066FSB and probably wouldn't be bottlenecked by an 800. FSB is hardly saturated yet, despite what AMD wants you to believe.

What the hell makes you dislike 800FSB? The QX6700 suffers no bottlenecking and that's on a slightly faster 1066FSB and probably wouldn't be bottlenecked by an 800. FSB is hardly saturated yet, despite what AMD wants you to believe.

I personally don't like the 800FSB because it allows overclockers to run faster using cheaper RAM. Overclocking is THE DEVIL! All overclockers should SUFFER THE HEAVY WAGES OF SIN!!

What the hell makes you dislike 800FSB? The QX6700 suffers no bottlenecking and that's on a slightly faster 1066FSB and probably wouldn't be bottlenecked by an 800. FSB is hardly saturated yet, despite what AMD wants you to believe.

I personally don't like the 800FSB because it allows overclockers to run faster using cheaper RAM. Overclocking is THE DEVIL! All overclockers should SUFFER THE HEAVY WAGES OF SIN!!


That's gotta be the most ridiculous thing i've heard since all that jazz about the so called "millenium bug" in 1999.

I myself dont see anything wrong with buying a 175 dollar cpu and getting it to run faster than a 900 dollar one.