Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Iiyama LCD 4637UT and 4611 vs. NEC 1850SE

Last response: in Computer Peripherals
June 19, 2002 10:20:19 AM

Hi guys, I went to my local Computer Center, and what do I see? Yes, the two new Iiyama 4637UT and 4611... The first one has a very good design and soft colors. The latter is ulky, but with brighter colors
I ran on these screens MadOnion sthg demo, and I could not see any of the faults we are all speaking about. Images were crisp, there was no motion fuzziness. The colors were superb. The NEC being it seemed a little brighter though. Another advantage is the NEC was accepting as well 1600x1200. But otherwise it looked great.

So tell me: is there anything I have missed?
Are they good enough?
Should we wait for new Sharp with 10bit definition and the new Viewsonic with 10ms refresh rate to be released?

Best regards...

June 20, 2002 12:17:35 AM

Has anybody seen these screens?
June 24, 2002 11:37:39 PM

I would go wtih Iiyama's LCD. My friend have one and it looks great but I forget what model he have.
Related resources
Can't find your answer ? Ask !
June 25, 2002 4:28:21 AM

Viewsonic 10 ms response time lcd? Where'd you hear this?

My frog asked me for a straw...dunno what happened his ass all over the place :eek: 
June 29, 2002 6:24:08 PM

I've just bought the Iiyama 4637UT and it not only looks good, the performance is pretty good too. I find no evidence of ghosting in RTCW, for example. In photoshop, however, there is clear banding in single colour fades. DVD's are fantastic. No dead pixels either, so I can recommend this monitor with only the proviso regarding Photoshop.