Replied in other thread pulled forward here;
The original source says the
system requires 300W, which is what we expected, Kyle misread it to mean the card itself requires the full 300W.
BTW, where does the 300W come from when the PCIe only supplies 75W as a PCIe1.1 slot, and 75W on a 6 pin connector and then 100W on an 8 pin connector. Sounds like he's having trouble adding.
Also I find it funny that he writes about the card requiring 13+" of space (but not saying the actual card length) and implying it'll be the biggest card, yet, the GF7900GX2 would be longer if the 12.5" OEM R600 card at VR-Zone are accurate.
Looks like rumour-mongering of the InQ variety, but without the natural tendency of most people to distrust the InQ.
Must be a slow news day, especially with [H] not actually getting their hands on one, or seeing one live, unlike the EEtimes article which says 200W R600;
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197700269
yeah. maybe why they delayed it till may.
have some bugs to work out?
AMD quashed bug rumours here;
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/02/28/amd_690g_launch/