In Tom's review of the x2 6000 they list the memory for the review at DDR2 800, but in the cpu charts at DDr2 750.
Although the x2 5600 and x2 6000 are both Windsor 90nm with the same cache, the chart shows
the x2 5600 outperforming the x2 6000 on the Serious Sam benchmark.
The only thing I can see is the x2 5600 is running at 800 mhz mem speed, while they have the x2 6000 at 750 mhz.
In the review article of the 6000, it outperforms the 5600 on the call of duty bench, and in the charts too.
Anyone understand why not with Serious Sam?
Does 750 Mhz mem speed account for it?
----------------
links:
review: http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/02/20/does-amds-athlon-64-x2-6000-have-any-kick-left/page5.html
charts: http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&model1=696&model2=694&chart=168
Although the x2 5600 and x2 6000 are both Windsor 90nm with the same cache, the chart shows
the x2 5600 outperforming the x2 6000 on the Serious Sam benchmark.
The only thing I can see is the x2 5600 is running at 800 mhz mem speed, while they have the x2 6000 at 750 mhz.
In the review article of the 6000, it outperforms the 5600 on the call of duty bench, and in the charts too.
Anyone understand why not with Serious Sam?
Does 750 Mhz mem speed account for it?
----------------
links:
review: http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/02/20/does-amds-athlon-64-x2-6000-have-any-kick-left/page5.html
charts: http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&model1=696&model2=694&chart=168