Which of these 2 HP computers would be the better one to...

hooterville

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2007
82
0
18,630
purchase?

Going to purchase one of these 2 HP desktop computers this week at Circuit City and would like to know what everyone thinks would be the better machine?


HP Pavilion Desktop PC (A1730N)

•AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+
•320GB hard drive
•LightScribe-enabled •2GB of DDR2 memory
•Burns DVDs and CDs
•Windows Vista Home Premium

Or

HP Pavilion Media Center Desktop PC (A1740N)

•Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
•320GB hard drive
•LightScribe-enabled •2GB of DDR2 memory
•Burns DVDs and CDs
•Windows Vista Home Premium

Having trouble deciding between the AMD or Intel machine.

Please give me your opinions as to which would be the better computer?

Thank You..
 

ajfink

Distinguished
Dec 3, 2006
1,150
0
19,280
The E6300 machine will perform better in most any task. Please uninstall all the bloatware the moment you get it...or even a clean install if you can...I'll sleep better.
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
Well, if (as it seems since you have chosen a HP), you're not interested in overclocking, those CPUs perform pretty much the same way so you can ask for further opinions, flip a coin or throw dice; whichever you get will make a robust home PC. I am sitting on a 4600+ clocked 4200+ and it feels like nothing before, especiallyy if you never had a dual core before :wink:
 

hooterville

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2007
82
0
18,630
The E6300 machine will perform better in most any task. Please uninstall all the bloatware the moment you get it...or even a clean install if you can...I'll sleep better.

The AMD is listed at 2.4 GHz and the Intel is listed at 1.9GHz.

Will the Intel will still be faster then the 2.4 AMD?
 

gOJDO

Distinguished
Mar 16, 2006
2,309
1
19,780
The E6300 machine will perform better in most any task. Please uninstall all the bloatware the moment you get it...or even a clean install if you can...I'll sleep better.
I disagree.
The 4600+ will outperform the E6300 in most benchmarks and real-world apps.
The C2D are 20% faster in average, than the K8.
1866MHz * 1.2 = 2239MHz
2400MHz > 2239MHz

Here is a list of Core2 Duo benchmarks, and a comparison of C2D vs K8:
AnandTech- http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2795
Bit Tech - http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2006/07/14/intel_core_2_duo_processors/1.html
ByteSector - http://www.bytesector.com/data/bs-article.asp?id=661
Chile Hardware - http://www.chilehardware.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=hardware_reviews&file=200607131
Club IC - http://www.clubic.com/article-36354-1-le-pentium-laisse-la-place-intel-core-2-duo.html
Computer Base - http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/hardware/prozessoren/2006/test_intel_core_2_extreme_x6800/
Digit Life - http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/cpu/intel-core2-duo-e6600.html
Extreme Tech - http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1989036,00.asp
Firing Squad - http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/intel_core_2_performance/
GD Hardware - http://www.gdhardware.com/hardware/cpus/intel/conroe/X6800_E6700/001.htm
GotFrag - http://hardware.gotfrag.com/portal/story/33492/
Guru3D - http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=185555
HardOCP - http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTEwOCwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==
Hardware Secrets - http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/348
HardwareZone - http://www.hardwarezone.com.sg/articles/view.php?cid=2&id=1980
Hardware.fr - http://www.hardware.fr/articles/633-1/express-core-2-duo-p965-vs-i975x.html
Hexus - http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=6184
Hot Hardware - http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=845&cid=1
Legion Hardware - http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=569
Legit Reviews - http://www.legitreviews.com/article/362/1/
MadBox PC - http://www.madboxpc.com/contenido.php?id=2394
Mad Shrimps - http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=470
Maximo PC - http://www.maximopc.org/articulos/intel_core_2_duo_review_parte_1.html
NeoSeeker - http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Reviews/core2duo_e6700/
OCAU - http://www.overclockers.com.au/article.php?id=489587
OC Workbench - http://www.ocworkbench.com/2006/intel/core2duo/g1.htm
PC Perspective - http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=272
Phoronix - http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=512&num=1
Planet X64 - http://www.planetx64.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=283&Itemid=14
Sharky Extreme - http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/cpu/article.php/3620036
Sim HQ - http://www.simhq.com/_technology2/technology_090a.html
Tech Report - http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q3/core2/index.x?pg=1
Tom's Hardware - http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/07/14/core2_duo_knocks_out_athlon_64/
Trusted Reviews - http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?art=3161
TweakTown - http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/923/
Xbit Labs - http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core2duo-e6300.html

You'll find there E6300 vs 4600 benchmarks for sure. Also you can check out TG interactive CPU charts.
 

spanner_razor

Distinguished
Nov 24, 2006
468
0
18,780
Well he could check toms hardware cpu chart but there is no 6300 on there. But I would suggest getting the 6300 machine as you can always upgrade it later.
 

scorch

Distinguished
Jun 2, 2004
297
0
18,790
Ajfink---Great suggestion. When ever a friend or family member gets a name brand computer I always go through and get rid of all the crap that is running in the backround.
 

sailer

Splendid
My opinion would be to get whichever is cheapest. The AMD one would probably be a bit faster in stock form. I've got a couple friends who own HP's, and so can say from experince that they are a pain to upgrade at best, and not upgradeable at all in many cases. Unless they've changed the way they design their BIOS, no overclocking is possible, so don't count on that helping the Intel psu..
 

BaronMatrix

Splendid
Dec 14, 2005
6,655
0
25,790
Well, if (as it seems since you have chosen a HP), you're not interested in overclocking, those CPUs perform pretty much the same way so you can ask for further opinions, flip a coin or throw dice; whichever you get will make a robust home PC. I am sitting on a 4600+ clocked 4200+ and it feels like nothing before, especiallyy if you never had a dual core before :wink:

Did you say toss a coin? Prepare for flames even though you're right.
 
Yeah.....the A64 will be faster in that case....as a plus side hps run cool and verrrry quiet....as long as the hard drive is not churning away....

also take into consideration the video difference....

and YES....uninstall all the extra stuff you get with it.....
 

WR

Distinguished
Jul 18, 2006
603
0
18,980
No one's going to flame him... the two processors are very close, and overclocking is out of the question. The system prices are probably identical, too.

The difference between right and wrong here is a matter of fact regarding what the benchmarks say.

Some will suggest to support the underdog and go with AMD when it's a close call, so that we have more balanced competition. That's an opinion, of course.
 

StevieD

Distinguished
Jun 29, 2004
548
0
18,980
The AMD is cheaper this week (CC's website is showing $100 spread).

All things considered, $ talks, and performance wise neither unit is going to run away from the other. IF performance is nearly the same (or within 10%) then cost versus performance must be considered at which point the AMD is a better bang for the lower buck.

So buy the AMD.

Or, better yet, buy the Intel and help the value of my mutual fund grow.
 

anosh

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2004
23
0
18,510
I have two dell computers in my house. One just normal one used for email work etc.. since it was quiet I bought an XPS which is their top of the line gaming line computers.

If hp is anything like dell you'll find that you cannot upgrade the computer very much leading to you being forced to buying a new computer next time you wish to upgrade.

For cheap low end computers you can't bet Dell or HP but for around 900-1200 you can build one much better than what they offer for half of what they ask.
 

m25

Distinguished
May 23, 2006
2,363
0
19,780
Overall, the 4600+ has a slight edge over the E6300 and potentially a longer and beter upgrade path with K10 CPUs to come.
 

Grimmy

Splendid
Feb 20, 2006
4,431
0
22,780
Bottom Line, which of these two processors is the better one?

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+

or

Intel Core 2 Duo E6300

What Ya Think?

Depends.

If your using the CPU on a MB that can not Over clock, the X2 4600+ is a better buy.

If your running a MB that has good OC'ing abilities, with the right parts, the E6300 can reach speeds of the E6800, or surpass FX60-62 performance. Then the E6300 would be a better buy.
 

mad_murdock

Distinguished
Nov 3, 2006
140
0
18,680
I'd recommend getting the C2D if you plan to upgrade down the road to say maybe a E6600 or 6700 once the price goes down.

And like the other said, HP (and all those guys) load a slew of "Craplets" I just ordered and setup one for a friend's mom and I'm suprised at the amount of crap they load up that's suppose to be a "Value added" service.

Who the F88K needs a link to ebay and vonage loaded on their system ? On boot I had 58 processes running, when a clean install of vista will have about 35-38. And I couldn't find anything worth keeping, so I removed it all.

Here's a screenshot of a new HP system on boot. I don't hate HP or anything, as they all do it. I just want to kill the people in charge who somehow think this is a value added service.

On another side note, I just read an article by Alex St John in CPU magazine where he is hating on Microsoft and defending the OEMs who do this. Microsoft referred to it has loading crapplets and he took issue with that. Though his main complaint stems from he makes money off the Wildtangent games. I don't overly love Microsoft, but I have to agree with them for wanting to stop the OEMS from loading all this crap on a system.

Oh yeah, I would encourage you to actually call HP and demand to get an actual Vista Install DVD from there. Dell charges $20 for it and I don't trust those system recovery disk (like when the drive dies). Scream loud enough and threaten to buy a Dell and you'll get it.
 

hooterville

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2007
82
0
18,630
Will HP send me the actual Vista disc for free?

Also how do you get rid of all that crap?

Most of it is not in the uninstall programs area?
 

dsidious

Distinguished
Dec 9, 2006
285
0
18,780
My opinion would be to get whichever is cheapest. The AMD one would probably be a bit faster in stock form. I've got a couple friends who own HP's, and so can say from experince that they are a pain to upgrade at best, and not upgradeable at all in many cases. Unless they've changed the way they design their BIOS, no overclocking is possible, so don't count on that helping the Intel psu..

Excellent point. My HP computer came with a 300W PSU and I suspect I'll need to replace it if I want to add a serious graphics card. The integrated NVidia graphics are great for movies and SimCity but not for serious games. Overclocking would also require a better PSU and better cooling (if possible at all, I haven't tried). Adding things to it is going to be a pain: one PCI-E x16 slot, so no SLI. One slot for a new hard disk, plus their proprietary Personal Media Drive slot which is just wasting a lot of space.
And yes, tons of software garbage. I especially hate that it didn't come with a Windows DVD - what do I do if I have a problem, restore from the backup DVD and get all that garbage installed again???

The good news is that it cost half of what a custom PC with about the same specifications would have cost in the same city. It's fast and pretty quiet. It's got a decent tuner card that wasn't even listed on the web page. The integrated audio is good enough for me, but you'll probably want a sound card and you may not have a free PCI slot for it - check before buying.
Do get an HP computer if you can live with these limitations.
 
Youll be getting a oem version of vista, so no cds. You will be able to uninstall all the crapware you dont want or need. And upgrade limitations are for mobos only. You can upgrade psu, graphics and cpu. Not sure but Im betting youll have a few open pci slots as well if you want a sound card, tv tuner etc. All things being equal go amd if its cheaper. If your mobo is atx you shouldnt have any upgrade problems
 

mad_murdock

Distinguished
Nov 3, 2006
140
0
18,680
Free ? I dunno, because I didn't get to scream at the HP sales person. If you are not a screamer, then you probably won't get it. Because if you ask nicely, they will say no. But I've heard from a few people that said, you just have to insist and point out that Dell says on their website you can have a Disc for $20 (though they call it a recovery CD, so it may not be much better than what you get). If nothing else, you knew someone with the Vista DVD you could make a copy of it and use it with your Serial key that will be stickered on the side. Why HP\Dell\others don't send a disc is beyond me, I mean what's it cost $2 ? I personally think they don't want people wiping the system and getting ride of all the crapplets

I was able to un-install everything from the Programs add\remove section. It's just annoying to me.

Though it doesn't come with a PCI-Express 6 plug, you can get a convertor for a few bucks off newegg. I've added a X850 to a older system (a1114n) I got for my stepson and I put my X1900XTX in this one (a1750y) and ran some Doom3, FEAR and 3dMark06 benchmarks, system seem to be fine with the X1900XTX card in, though it's a bit of a tight squeeze.
 

TRENDING THREADS