Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
I had salespeople at two different stores tell me that nobody makes
large screen 4:3 sets anymore. (Neither store stocked any, either.)
Is this on the level?
--
"I've seen first hand how Superman actually transforms people's lives.
I have seen children dying of brain tumors who wanted as their last
request to be able to talk to me, and have gone to their graves with a
peace brought on by knowing that their belief in this kind of character
is intact. I've seen that Superman really matters. They're connecting
with something very basic: the ability to overcome obstacles, the
ability to persevere, the ability to understand difficulty and to turn
your back on it."
- Christopher Reeve
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Absolutely incorrect. Sony is just starting to sell the KD-36XS955, a
36" 4:3 set with most of the HD features of their 16:9 sets.
-------------------------------
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 22:11:02 -0500, Keeper of the Purple Twilight
<no@spam.invalid> wrote:
>I had salespeople at two different stores tell me that nobody makes
>large screen 4:3 sets anymore. (Neither store stocked any, either.)
>Is this on the level?
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
I have a new Sanyo 32" 4:3 HDTV with tuner/HDMI - Walmart exclusive $749
There was talk some months ago about CRT TV's becoming obsolete when JVC
announced discontinuing their 34" HDTV.
Within the last few weeks I read a press release from Samsung(?)
announcing a new short neck CRT (currently crt's are 21" deep). Their
new line will include large direct view CRT's with a maximum depth of
14", ultimately decreasing to a 7" depth. CRT's are still state of the
art for me in terms of resolution vs cost per inch displayed. Sounds
like Samsung is trying to compete with LCD/Plasma. Too bad CRT's are so
heavy. My 32" weighs in at about 175 pounds.
Dave - N2LAK
Keeper of the Purple Twilight wrote:
> I had salespeople at two different stores tell me that nobody makes
> large screen 4:3 sets anymore. (Neither store stocked any, either.) Is
> this on the level?
>
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On 2004-09-05 22:52:30 -0500, Dave Hines <n2lak@optonline.net> said:
> I have a new Sanyo 32" 4:3 HDTV with tuner/HDMI - Walmart exclusive $749]
No, you misunderstand, when I say large screen, I mean LARGE SCREEN.
--
"I've seen first hand how Superman actually transforms people's lives.
I have seen children dying of brain tumors who wanted as their last
request to be able to talk to me, and have gone to their graves with a
peace brought on by knowing that their belief in this kind of character
is intact. I've seen that Superman really matters. They're connecting
with something very basic: the ability to overcome obstacles, the
ability to persevere, the ability to understand difficulty and to turn
your back on it."
- Christopher Reeve
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On 2004-09-05 22:36:36 -0500, Abe <noone@nowhere.com> said:
>
> Absolutely incorrect. Sony is just starting to sell the KD-36XS955, a
> 36" 4:3 set with most of the HD features of their 16:9 sets.
I mean REALLY big screen. Like at least 50 to 60 inches. Possibly larger.
--
"No urban night is like the night [in NYC]...here is our poetry, for we
have pulled down the stars to our will."
- Ezra Pound, poet and critic, 9/18/1912, reflecting on New York City
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 22:11:02 -0500, Keeper of the Purple Twilight
<no@spam.invalid> wrote:
>I had salespeople at two different stores tell me that nobody makes
>large screen 4:3 sets anymore. (Neither store stocked any, either.)
>Is this on the level?
Unless there's some sort of off-brand of some sort out there, I'm
pretty sure the only current big screen TV's you'll see in 4:3
anywhere are going to be direct view (tube) 32" and 36" variety.
As far as going bigger than 36", you're not going to find any
commonly-known manufacturers with a current 4:3 in the other
technologies to the best of my knowledge.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On 2004-09-05 23:47:39 -0500, HDTV-slingr <NOSPAMMERS@hotmail.com> said:
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 22:11:02 -0500, Keeper of the Purple Twilight
> <no@spam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I had salespeople at two different stores tell me that nobody makes
>> large screen 4:3 sets anymore. (Neither store stocked any, either.)
>> Is this on the level?
>
> Unless there's some sort of off-brand of some sort out there, I'm
> pretty sure the only current big screen TV's you'll see in 4:3
> anywhere are going to be direct view (tube) 32" and 36" variety.
>
> As far as going bigger than 36", you're not going to find any
> commonly-known manufacturers with a current 4:3 in the other
> technologies to the best of my knowledge.
>
Damn.
--
"No urban night is like the night [in NYC]...here is our poetry, for we
have pulled down the stars to our will."
- Ezra Pound, poet and critic, 9/18/1912, reflecting on New York City
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004, Keeper of the Purple Twilight wrote:
> I had salespeople at two different stores tell me that nobody makes large
> screen 4:3 sets anymore. (Neither store stocked any, either.) Is this on the
> level?
By "large," if one means greater than 36" diagonally measured, then I have
heard the same thing. All the 4:3 ratio sets I have seen in stores are 36" and
smaller. My observations, however, are not conclusive.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:47:39 -0500, HDTV-slingr
<NOSPAMMERS@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 22:11:02 -0500, Keeper of the Purple Twilight
><no@spam.invalid> wrote:
>
>>I had salespeople at two different stores tell me that nobody makes
>>large screen 4:3 sets anymore. (Neither store stocked any, either.)
>>Is this on the level?
>
>Unless there's some sort of off-brand of some sort out there, I'm
>pretty sure the only current big screen TV's you'll see in 4:3
>anywhere are going to be direct view (tube) 32" and 36" variety.
>
>As far as going bigger than 36", you're not going to find any
>commonly-known manufacturers with a current 4:3 in the other
>technologies to the best of my knowledge.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:52:30 GMT, Dave Hines <n2lak@optonline.net>
wrote:
>Within the last few weeks I read a press release from Samsung(?)
>announcing a new short neck CRT (currently crt's are 21" deep). Their
>new line will include large direct view CRT's with a maximum depth of
>14", ultimately decreasing to a 7" depth. CRT's are still state of the
>art for me in terms of resolution vs cost per inch displayed. Sounds
>like Samsung is trying to compete with LCD/Plasma. Too bad CRT's are so
>heavy. My 32" weighs in at about 175 pounds.
Go CRT. I'm looking at possibly buying a 30" widescreen CRT this fall
(small room). I'd seriously hope that CRT's will still be offered
until the competition (LCD's, etc) gets at least CLOSE to the price of
CRT. I'll live with the weight, for half the price and arguably
better performance...
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Dave Hines wrote:
> I have a new Sanyo 32" 4:3 HDTV with tuner/HDMI - Walmart exclusive $749
> There was talk some months ago about CRT TV's becoming obsolete when JVC
> announced discontinuing their 34" HDTV.
> Within the last few weeks I read a press release from Samsung(?)
> announcing a new short neck CRT (currently crt's are 21" deep). Their
> new line will include large direct view CRT's with a maximum depth of
> 14", ultimately decreasing to a 7" depth.
One has to wonder just how good corner brightness, resolution and
convergence is going to be with those extreme deflection angles.
Matthew
--
Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game
You can't win
You can't break even
You can't get out of the game
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
One does wonder! AVS Forum to the rescue, I hope.
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
> Dave Hines wrote:
>
>
>
> One has to wonder just how good corner brightness, resolution and
> convergence is going to be with those extreme deflection angles.
>
> Matthew
>
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:35:00 GMT, dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>Sony doesn't make that 40" CRT anymore?
Last I heard, Sony stopped making them this year but closeouts can
still be found if you poke around hard enough. Should be able to pick
one up for around a grand (give or take).
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
There are some still available, but more manufacturers are going wide
screen due to the all digital by 2006 FCC mandate
------------------------------------
Visit http://www.digitalinsurrection.com for news, forums and
information on a variety of digital interests including digital
satellite systems, tivo, replaytv and other digital video recorders
information and hard drive upgrades, free to air satellite, satellite
internet, satellite radio, xm radio and sirius, computing and much more.
Keeper of the Purple Twilight wrote:
> I had salespeople at two different stores tell me that nobody makes
> large screen 4:3 sets anymore. (Neither store stocked any, either.) Is
> this on the level?
>
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
"Keeper of the Purple Twilight" <no@spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:2004090523405711272%no@spaminvalid...
> On 2004-09-05 22:52:30 -0500, Dave Hines <n2lak@optonline.net> said:
>
> > I have a new Sanyo 32" 4:3 HDTV with tuner/HDMI - Walmart exclusive
$749]
>
> No, you misunderstand, when I say large screen, I mean LARGE SCREEN.
It dawned on me that you are likely referring to the old 4:3 rear
projection tv's (48", 50" and such). They haven't made those in a few years
that I have seen. All the new rear projection units are widescreen.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 00:59:00 -0700, Risestar <risestar@v3.ca> wrote:
>There are some still available, but more manufacturers are going wide
>screen due to the all digital by 2006 FCC mandate
The big problem with this is that even though everything will
be broadcast in digital, the vast majority of it is 4.3 content
that will still be shown in 4.3 format (albeit digital).
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:47:39 -0500, HDTV-slingr
<NOSPAMMERS@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Unless there's some sort of off-brand of some sort out there, I'm
>pretty sure the only current big screen TV's you'll see in 4:3
>anywhere are going to be direct view (tube) 32" and 36" variety.
>
>As far as going bigger than 36", you're not going to find any
>commonly-known manufacturers with a current 4:3 in the other
>technologies to the best of my knowledge.
Zenith currently makes a nice 40" 4.3 Plasma, and i think Hitachi
still makes one as well. AFAIK all the new RPTVs are widescreen.
>>Unless there's some sort of off-brand of some sort out there, I'm
>>pretty sure the only current big screen TV's you'll see in 4:3
>>anywhere are going to be direct view (tube) 32" and 36" variety.
>>
>>As far as going bigger than 36", you're not going to find any
>>commonly-known manufacturers with a current 4:3 in the other
>>technologies to the best of my knowledge.
>
>Zenith currently makes a nice 40" 4.3 Plasma, and i think Hitachi
>still makes one as well. AFAIK all the new RPTVs are widescreen.
Hi Randy, in the context of the thread, I was using the phrase "direct
view variety" to refer to other than regular, "old fashioned" tube
TV's, much like the one your grandpappy watched ;-)
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
"Keeper of the Purple Twilight" <no@spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:2004090523414177923%no@spaminvalid...
: On 2004-09-05 22:36:36 -0500, Abe <noone@nowhere.com> said:
:
: >
: > Absolutely incorrect. Sony is just starting to sell the KD-36XS955,
a
: > 36" 4:3 set with most of the HD features of their 16:9 sets.
:
: I mean REALLY big screen. Like at least 50 to 60 inches. Possibly
larger.
:
=====================
Why would anyone WANT a 4:3 set?
They are worthless in this day and age.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.