Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup (More info?)
"Peter" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> From Microsoft's FAQ it sounds like standard win2k can't act as the
> If so, I am back to products like PC/Anywhere. I have used that
> before. Is there anything a lot better? PCA works OK but I wonder if
> the screen transfers are well enough optimised.
> I just want a remote desktop from win2k-SP4 as the "server", and file
> Any tips much appreciated.
> Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail.
> E-mail replies to peter1234@peter2000XY.co.uk but remove the X and the Y.
> Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary.
Currently there are two flavours of Windows that support Terminal Services:
- Windows Server
- Windows XP Professional
And yes, you're right: Remote Desktop appears to be far better
optimised than either pcAnywhere or WinVNC.