Archived from groups: alt.games.nintendo.pokemon (
More info?)
On 2004-12-01 15:02:08 -0500, "Brion K. Lienhart" <brionl@comcast.net> said:
Not traditional Pyramid
> "Adrian Tymes" <wingcat@pacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:k0ord.37066$6q2.18744@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>> Chet Weaver - Wishing You a Very Happy Non-Demoninational Winter Season wrote:
>>> According to ds4free.com's FAQ, it's not a pyramid scheme because
>>> everyone who participates gets the same prizes. I suppose, then, it
>>> makes it more of a voluntary comsumer-driven direct-marketing
>>> promotion. And doesn't the money go UP the pyramid in the scheme? It's
>>> not like the free DS's come from the people who sign up.
>>
>> No, actually, pyramid schemes usually have the same prize in the end.
>> After a while (if it lasts long enough), the top ranks are bumped off
>> the list, and stop collecting. Granted, in this case the people signing
>> up don't have to pay the top levels - but that isn't what makes a
>> pyramid scheme, contrary to what ds4free.com says.
>
> If they put in a disclaimer "This is not a pyramid scheme". It *IS* a
> pyramid scheme.
> The essence of all pyramid schemes involve you doing something. Then
> you get X number of people to do something, then they each recruit X
> number of people to do something. The people at the top levels get all
> the benefits, and the people at the bottom levels get screwed. It may
> only be $4, but it's still a scam.
You're deffinition of a Pyramid scheme is correct. And in many ways
this deal falls under the same category. Ideally if one person signed
up and then got friends and those friends got other friends to sign up,
and so on and so, eventually at the bottom of the pyramid, those people
won't have anyone left to sign up...so they get nothing.
So in that sense, yes, it's a pyramid. HOWEVER, MOST pyramids involve
people at the bottom paying up. This is not the same.
In this sceme you do not pay up at all. The company offering the prize
makes it money by referring you to a new service. This is advertising.
Say company X is offering you a Gameboy DS for signing up with AOL.
You are not paying Company X. You are paying AOL. AOL pays Company X
a finder's fee for bringing in new members.
No one pays up the pyramid or down the pyramid.
Now eventually you run into the same problem, running out of people.
However, if you have a friend, relative, whatever who happens to want
one of the offered services (example, my dad recently wanted AOL -- for
only god knows why). He want's aol regardless. BUt if he signs up as
your reference, you get a Gameboy. Everyone wins.
I'm not arguing for or against. And in all honesty, it's really hard
to get people to look at this way. But it is a different perspective.
And btw, after 2 months, I was able to get an Apple iPod by this method.
Just my perspective
http://www.ds4free.com/default.aspx?r=68137