Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment (More info?)
Is it possible to make an image on a single CPU, IDE-based machine (as a
testing platform), and be able to sysprep it to wotk on a single or
multi-CPU machine, SCSI-based, with a RAID controller?
If not single CPU to single/multi, how about single CPU to single CPU,
IDE-to-SCSI? The docs seem to indicate that you can do IDE to SCSI,
presuming that your sysprep.inf has a [SysprepMassStorage] section that
defines the SCSI or RAID controller, and the drivers are available somewhere
in the image (such as c:\drivers\Perc4SC), and a line that reads
OemPnPDriversPath = c:\drivers\Perc4SC
Correct? Or am I totally misunderstanding, and just looking for immense
amounts of pain?
>Is it possible to make an image on a single CPU, IDE-based machine (as a
>testing platform), and be able to sysprep it to wotk on a single or
>multi-CPU machine, SCSI-based, with a RAID controller?
>
>If not single CPU to single/multi, how about single CPU to single CPU,
>IDE-to-SCSI?
This document pretty much covers the gambit of what can be done, in
both cases, and provides additional references for how to go about it.
<http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;838856>
>The docs seem to indicate that you can do IDE to SCSI,
>presuming that your sysprep.inf has a [SysprepMassStorage] section that
>defines the SCSI or RAID controller, and the drivers are available somewhere
>in the image (such as c:\drivers\Perc4SC), and a line that reads
>
>OemPnPDriversPath = c:\drivers\Perc4SC
The line above would have to be
OemPnPDriversPath = \drivers\Perc4SC
Because %systemroot% is automatically added where the c: is.
BUT, that entry is for PnP drivers that will be used during the GUI
portion of the Mini-setup, not during the initial text-mode portion in
which the mass storage controller/s is/are configured.
>Correct? Or am I totally misunderstanding, and just looking for immense
>amounts of pain?
Talk about an immense amount of pain.... I still am not 100% certain
about the $OEM$ folder stuff that I posted about earlier.
--
Dennis D. Calhoun <http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dcalhoun/>
Member, news.newusers.questions Moderation Board
Webmaster, news.newusers.questions Official Home Page
http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/
>Is it possible to make an image on a single CPU, IDE-based machine (as a
>testing platform), and be able to sysprep it to wotk on a single or
>multi-CPU machine, SCSI-based, with a RAID controller?
[snip]
A bit more info on this topic....
From "Microsoft Windows 2000 Sysprep Update" document....
For example, to support a new Qlogic driver (for enabling Sysprep to
include the necessities for configuring a Qlogic SCSI controller that
is not included on the Windows 200 disk), if the files were copied to
the Sysprep folder, you could add the following:
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment (More info?)
In your case what you need is simply to have the correct mass storage
controller loaded before you move the image to the different hardware. The
catch in doing this is that the HAL type needs to be the same on both
machines. If they are different, you will need to build a different image
for each HAL type.
The article has a section that describes the mass storage portion
specifically. If you follow that, then it should work fine.
--
Chris
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.
Please reply to the newsgroup so that others may benefit.
"Oli Strom" <Oli Strom@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FE27FF84-31AF-44F0-B1F5-E0ABD504B15D@microsoft.com...
>I am confused by the article that was suggested to read, Article #216915
> "Using the System Preparation Tool on Dissimilar Computers".
>
> It says the Windows 2000 system kernel (Ntoskrnl.exe) must be the same.
> Wouldn't it always be the same since the OS drive is being cloned?
>
> Has anybody had any success using sysprep to clone an IDE-based machine to
> one with a RAID?
>
> Any help would be much appreciated.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.