Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (
More info?)
Jack Zwick wrote:
> In article <cqk39g$6o9@library2.airnews.net>, Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Jack Zwick wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <cqjrrk$omi@library2.airnews.net>, Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Charles Perry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news
M_yd.14268$_3.159182@typhoon.sonic.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In <nSYyd.7730$L7.377@trnddc05> on Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:04:03 GMT, "Chris
>>>>>>W"
>>>>>><chaparral2350sx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thank you John. In doing a little more research, I see your name coming
>>>>>>>up
>>>>>>>quite a bit on the net...so since you seem to be a cell phone guru -
>>>>>>>which
>>>>>>>of these phones would YOU get?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>V551 (with 64K SIM), the best phone now being sold by Cingular IMHO.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I really like my V551 (which I have had all of a week now). My only
>>>>>complaint is that Cingular does a pathetic job explaining the available
>>>>>data
>>>>>features (actually, no explanation at all). I bought the package that
>>>>>includes 250 txt msgs, 50 multimedia, and I think 1MB of data. Well, I
>>>>>just
>>>>>figured out this morning that if I want to send a picture to an email
>>>>>address, I am using data, not multimedia. I appears, at least to me, that
>>>>>multimedia messages can only be sent to another phone.
>>>>>
>>>>>I sure wish Cingular had one place to go look for all of the info you need
>>>>>to use their service.
>>>>>
>>>>>Charles
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That's a spiffy idea Charles, but it'll never work because it makes too
>>>>much sense. The reason it'll never work is because I don't think
>>>>Cingular has a clue about how to do this, because if they did have a
>>>>clue, it would've already been done.
>>>
>>>
>>>Its been done.
>>>
>>>http://www.cingular.com/media/media_net
>>
>>
>>I tried going there previously, and again now - all I get is 404.
>
>
> Try using the FoxFire browser.
I've tried Firefox, Nutscrape, and even the dreaded IE, same results -
so something's amiss deeper under the hood. I'm suspecting some option
in the firewall... now... where's that nephew....?
--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'