Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment (More info?)

 

Is there a way to limit the GPO software installations to workstations
and avoid the server(s) ?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment (More info?)

 

Yes.

The normal method would be to place all your workstations in a single OU and
apply the policy there. I'm guessing that all your computers (both servers
and workstations) are still in the default "Computers" container and that,
because you can't apply a GPO to this container because it's not an OU,
you're applying the GPO at the root of the domain.

So, just create another OU, place your workstations in it and link the GPO
at this point instead of where you're currently linking it.

Hope this helps

Oli


"flekso" <flekso@vip.hr> wrote in message
news:ce596c73.0411280744.1d3c8c8a@posting.google.com...
> Is there a way to limit the GPO software installations to workstations
> and avoid the server(s) ?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment (More info?)

 

But what happens when new workstations are added to the domain, it's
not future proof.

"Oli Restorick [MVP]" <oli@mvps.org> wrote in message news:<eal9VrW1EHA.1452@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>...
> Yes.
>
> The normal method would be to place all your workstations in a single OU and
> apply the policy there. I'm guessing that all your computers (both servers
> and workstations) are still in the default "Computers" container and that,
> because you can't apply a GPO to this container because it's not an OU,
> you're applying the GPO at the root of the domain.
>
> So, just create another OU, place your workstations in it and link the GPO
> at this point instead of where you're currently linking it.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Oli
>
>
> "flekso" <flekso@vip.hr> wrote in message
> news:ce596c73.0411280744.1d3c8c8a@posting.google.com...
> > Is there a way to limit the GPO software installations to workstations
> > and avoid the server(s) ?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment (More info?)

 

flekso wrote:
> But what happens when new workstations are added to the domain, it's
> not future proof.

You should put your workstations directly in that OU (the solution depends
on the way you install your workstations).

If you use unattended or sysprep, use the answer file. If you do it
manually, use netdom.

To be very sure, I suggest not to use a domain admin account. Create a
special account for joins and don't let it the write acces to "computers"

--
===========================
Nicolas (kirioss chez ifrance pt com)
This behavior is by design (Microsoft)
===========================

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win2000.setup_deployment (More info?)

 

You either add them by script to the correct place, create the computer
accounts ahead of time, or move them afterwards.

Oli


"flekso" <flekso@vip.hr> wrote in message
news:ce596c73.0411290408.5c799800@posting.google.com...
> But what happens when new workstations are added to the domain, it's
> not future proof.
>
> "Oli Restorick [MVP]" <oli@mvps.org> wrote in message
> news:<eal9VrW1EHA.1452@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>...
>> Yes.
>>
>> The normal method would be to place all your workstations in a single OU
>> and
>> apply the policy there. I'm guessing that all your computers (both
>> servers
>> and workstations) are still in the default "Computers" container and
>> that,
>> because you can't apply a GPO to this container because it's not an OU,
>> you're applying the GPO at the root of the domain.
>>
>> So, just create another OU, place your workstations in it and link the
>> GPO
>> at this point instead of where you're currently linking it.
>>
>> Hope this helps
>>
>> Oli
>>
>>
>> "flekso" <flekso@vip.hr> wrote in message
>> news:ce596c73.0411280744.1d3c8c8a@posting.google.com...
>> > Is there a way to limit the GPO software installations to workstations
>> > and avoid the server(s) ?

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows 2000/NT > Windows 2000/NT General Discussion > GPO installations
Go to:

There are 1140 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 Ckaz won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 james59 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 snarl won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 patlabor44 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Kiren won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 WookinPaNub won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 kwadams won the Uniformed badge
  • 21:57 brockh won the Sophmore badge
  • 01:00 xpax won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Mizoguchi won the Freshman badge