They do, but that's combined cache (both cores) 2x512k. It's similar to the HT spec. Some claim it as 1000MHz, some say 2000MHz.Does this processor only have a 512 L2 cache? I thought all AMD X2 dual core processors had at least a 1mb. Also, is the windsor better than this. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The Windsor X2 3600+ has 265K L2 for each core but it's 2.0GHz compared to 1.9 of the brisbane makes it a better performar @ stock speed.
The Windsor X2 3600+ has 265K L2 for each core but it's 2.0GHz compared to 1.9 of the brisbane makes it a better performar @ stock speed.
The Windsor X2 3600+ has 265K L2 for each core but it's 2.0GHz compared to 1.9 of the brisbane makes it a better performar @ stock speed.
If you have any plans to overclock, then it's the same with cache and cores....you can't add cores/cache, once you've bought it...but you can overclock to similar speed. I would grab the Brisbane as well.But performance on stock speeds actually is higher for the Windsor and 256K is still not that little for a K8 chip, only should cut a 2-3% performance at most compared to 512K L2, while 1.9 to 2.0 is 5% and more if you consider the higher latency of the Brisbane.