The demo is called whiteout and uses a R600 card...or atleast thats what we have been told. Looks pretty good, though u can tell the framerate was a bit low at points. Still i like the demo...i think its better than the ones nvidia has recently released any way
from a distance(the shots when she was in air) she looked like a plastic doll
light reflections where hexagons not circles(eveident on missile tower)
metal was too shiny looked like aluminumum more than real metal.
the mountains where the best looking part.
sit and watch a FFX FMV they look better than that and thats on a PS3... im not impressed, then again i wasnt impressed by oblivion either the bumpmapping and bad textures on distant hills destroyed that game.
im holding out for 8900GTX and the ati's card after the R600.
also i liked the core2duo sign at the begining considering amd own ati now
EDIT
u can tell im tired when i make silly mistakes like that.
Kinda early to judge. I'd have to see a higher resolution vid till I can make my opinion on the matter. Although some parts did look a bit bleh...I won't jump the gun on the lagginess of the video either till I can see some real benchmarks on the sucker....Overall I think it would look better on a system then that vid....But it is a public demonstration so I doub't they'd skip out with cruddy hardware...Bah...mixed feelings. I'll have to wait for more devolpment in it's capabilities..>_<
Just looking at these two pictures and nothing else - the one on the left looks like a cartoon character and the one on the right looks more real. Is this due to the capabilities of the cards the animations were rendered on or the skill of the animators?
Just looking at these two pictures and nothing else - the one on the left looks like a cartoon character and the one on the right looks more real. Is this due to the capabilities of the cards the animations were rendered on or the skill of the animators?
Q
it's a shader program's job to do realistic rendering.So it could either be the card can't execute highly sophisticated shaders (software that runs on the graphics card) or that the shader isn't that realistic.
Just looking at these two pictures and nothing else - the one on the left looks like a cartoon character and the one on the right looks more real. Is this due to the capabilities of the cards the animations were rendered on or the skill of the animators?
Q
it's a shader program's job to do realistic rendering.So it could either be the card can't execute highly sophisticated shaders (software that runs on the graphics card) or that the shader isn't that realistic.
So just to clarify,
Either the card can't do it or the programmer/animator hasn't got thier shader right.
My question was intended as rhetorical but it still remains to be seen (excuse the pun) as to which is the weak link - card or animator.
Just looking at these two pictures and nothing else - the one on the left looks like a cartoon character and the one on the right looks more real. Is this due to the capabilities of the cards the animations were rendered on or the skill of the animators?
Q
Probably both, but also the picture on the left (Ruby) is older than the one on the right, hence the quality improvement.
The demo wasn't all that impressive, not that I'm generally impressed by either Nvidia or ATI's tech demos.
While I agree the visuals weren't that spectacular, but the idea of what's going on underneath is pretty good. Especially the idea that the exploding ice/snow were using VPU physics which is what is being said.
I'm sure the details will be more impressive than the actual demo. Like the Cascades demo, it's not the demo itself that's impressive, but what it represents and does behind the scenes.
As with any demo recorded with a cell phone or what ever it was, it's gonna look like crap. Now to watch the demo in person, that would be a different story.
Just looking at these two pictures and nothing else - the one on the left looks like a cartoon character and the one on the right looks more real. Is this due to the capabilities of the cards the animations were rendered on or the skill of the animators?
Q
I'd say they both look like cartoons. But the nose on nVidia's looks ridiculous.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.