Tom's Hardware > Forum > Home Theatre > HDTV > A confused reader's question about Black

A confused reader's question about Black

Forum Home Theatre : HDTV - A confused reader's question about Black

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

I spent much of this afternoon listening to a salesman at a BestBuy
telling me about the advantages of each of the fine sets he had for
sale.

Perhaps someone here can help me sort through the bullshit for the
nuggets of truth.

Thanks if you can.

Point 1 -- The Plasma's will have the best black of any of the big
screens.

Observation. Many of the other sets looked damned fine, too. Is it
just that they didn't tweak the plasmas to be wonderful, or perhaps
are they all so close that the average video viewer wouldn't be able
to tell a difference (sort of like the old audiophiles saying they
could tell a moving magnet coil on their turntable, while I couldn't
perceive the difference?)

Point 2 -- The JVC lcos type set is very good, and without the smear
effect that motion seems to produce on dlp's and lcd's.

Observation. I could not see the effect I've read about here, but
perhaps it was the choice of the demo feeds they had to make it look
good. Or, are the third generation dlp's and the lcos on pretty equal
ground now?

Point 3 -- All the plasmas will have a better viewing angle than any
of the dlps, projection lcd's and so on.

Observation -- perhaps by a bit, but again they all looked pretty
good.

Point 4 -- All the newer, expensive sets are good so no matter where
you drop your $3000, most everyone will be satisfied, so go ahead,
pick one out and go from there.

Observation -- I dunno, but that kind of cash isn't chicken feed for
me, so I need to choose the best I can, since I'm going to have it
awhile.

Final Point -- even if you have your own video setup disk and have
done it with the tube you have, you'd better leave the delivery and
setup of this type of set to our installation pros (for a price, of
course, and I can't take it home with me right now).

What about this comment?


Well, thanks for any comments on these items. I sincerely appreciate
it.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Bouncer wrote:
>
> I spent much of this afternoon listening to a salesman at a BestBuy
> telling me about the advantages of each of the fine sets he had for
> sale.
>
> Perhaps someone here can help me sort through the bullshit for the
> nuggets of truth.
>
> Thanks if you can.
>
> Point 1 -- The Plasma's will have the best black of any of the big
> screens.

I'll bet big screen excludes the 34" HiDef CRTs.. cause
CRTs have superb blacks.... I favor Sony CRTs...


>
> Observation. Many of the other sets looked damned fine, too. Is it
> just that they didn't tweak the plasmas to be wonderful, or perhaps
> are they all so close that the average video viewer wouldn't be able
> to tell a difference (sort of like the old audiophiles saying they
> could tell a moving magnet coil on their turntable, while I couldn't
> perceive the difference?)
>
> Point 2 -- The JVC lcos type set is very good, and without the smear
> effect that motion seems to produce on dlp's and lcd's.
>
> Observation. I could not see the effect I've read about here, but
> perhaps it was the choice of the demo feeds they had to make it look
> good. Or, are the third generation dlp's and the lcos on pretty equal
> ground now?
>
> Point 3 -- All the plasmas will have a better viewing angle than any
> of the dlps, projection lcd's and so on.
>
> Observation -- perhaps by a bit, but again they all looked pretty
> good.
>
> Point 4 -- All the newer, expensive sets are good so no matter where
> you drop your $3000, most everyone will be satisfied, so go ahead,
> pick one out and go from there.

Plasma sets under ~$4000 usually are not Hi Def TVs (1080i)
but rather a lesser quality Ext Def which is 480p...
Sets $4200 and up will usually be of Hi Def quality..

Plasmas TVs are at a premium price... They Should require a
longer term warranty... They are hard & expensive to fix...



> Observation -- I dunno, but that kind of cash isn't chicken feed for
> me, so I need to choose the best I can, since I'm going to have it
> awhile.
>
> Final Point -- even if you have your own video setup disk and have
> done it with the tube you have, you'd better leave the delivery and
> setup of this type of set to our installation pros (for a price, of
> course, and I can't take it home with me right now).
>
> What about this comment?
>
> Well, thanks for any comments on these items. I sincerely appreciate
> it.

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Bouncer wrote:

>Observation. Many of the other sets looked damned fine, too.

You can't judge from the signals or the setup in the store.

If cost is an issue, you care about motion smear, and angle isn't a big deal,
then don't discount CRT-based RPTV -- while everyone is pushing panel displays,
the pictures on these simply can't be beat for the buck. Unless you really
need flat and light I'd consider this as a first choice.

JGM
I'm JGM, and I approved this message.

Reply to JGM

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Bouncer (humz@alot.net) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> Point 1 -- The Plasma's will have the best black of any of the big
> screens.

CRT-based sets (either direct-view or rear-projection) have the best and
most accurate display of blacks.

> Point 4 -- All the newer, expensive sets are good so no matter where
> you drop your $3000, most everyone will be satisfied, so go ahead,
> pick one out and go from there.

This is just plain wrong. The difference in all sorts of quality (both
picture and build) in the $2500-$3500 display range is huge. Yes, they
*all* look far better than SD-only sets, but that's not hard to do.

> Final Point -- even if you have your own video setup disk and have
> done it with the tube you have, you'd better leave the delivery and
> setup of this type of set to our installation pros (for a price, of
> course, and I can't take it home with me right now).
>
> What about this comment?

More nonsense. Delivery is your call...if the set isn't too big/heavy
and you want to do it yourself, that's fine. If delivery is free, then,
sure, let them do it.

But, 99% of delivery people *cannot* set up a display for anything more
than basic use, and *none* of them will calibrate it in any way for free.
Use that DVD (Video Essentials, Avia, etc.) to set it up yourself...follow
the instructions and you *will* get the best picture possible out of
that display.

--
Jeff Rife | "Tragedy struck today in Sector Nine as rebel
SPAM bait: | terrorists blew up the Death Star, killing
AskDOJ@usdoj.gov | thousands. The Rebel Alliance, a fringe group
spam@ftc.gov | of anti-Empire fanatics, has claimed
| responsibility for the terrorist act.
| Fortunately, Lord Vader escaped without harm.
| Our hearts go out to the families of the
| victims."
| -- "NewsRadio"

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Interesting thought. Of course, from a salesman's point of view a
more expensive set is a bigger profit in the long run.

I have seen a sony and toshiba rptv that is in the $1500 range and
looked quite nice (don't remember the model, etc.) and may need to go
back and look at that.

In general, has the quality and improvment in picture steadily
increased over the last few years, too, or have the models that do crt
rptv been "abandonded" as the newer sexier technologies come forth?



On 25 Sep 2004 02:43:48 GMT, jgmclean0@aol.com (JGM) wrote:

>Bouncer wrote:
>
>>Observation. Many of the other sets looked damned fine, too.
>
> You can't judge from the signals or the setup in the store.
>
> If cost is an issue, you care about motion smear, and angle isn't a big deal,
>then don't discount CRT-based RPTV -- while everyone is pushing panel displays,
>the pictures on these simply can't be beat for the buck. Unless you really
>need flat and light I'd consider this as a first choice.
>
>JGM
>I'm JGM, and I approved this message.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

"Alan Figgatt" <afiggatt@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bYadnTmk17IUtsvcRVn-qA@comcast.com...
> Leonard Caillouet wrote:
> >
> > Allan, where did you get the 60,000 hour number on the Panasonic sets?
> >
> > Leonard
>
> The 60,000 hour number comes from postings on www.avsforum.com. People
> have asked Panasonic what the rated life span is for the current
> generation 6UY (commercial version) and the consumer PD/PX25 versions
> and Panasonic specifically states it as 60,000 hours to half brightness.
> I don't see it in the specs on the website, but it may be the marketing
> dept doesn't see the need to publicize it. Chances are few people will
> ever keep these sets as their main TVs long enough to get anywhere close
> to 60,000 hours given the falling prices and improving displays we will
> see over the next few years.


The reason that I ask is that I have repeatedly asked tech reps at Panasonic
this question and they say that they do not have any published life
expectancy. They have said that their experience is that the numbers will
be much lower than this, probably less than crts. Most of the numbers that
I have seen actually in publication have been from Fujitsu and Zenith, or
simply hearsay from forums.

From what I can tell, these kinds of numbers are very, very optimistic. I
would not expect 60,000 hours out of any CRT, much less a PDP (for 50%
brightness level).

Leonard

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Leonard Caillouet wrote:
>
> Allan, where did you get the 60,000 hour number on the Panasonic sets?
>
> Leonard

The 60,000 hour number comes from postings on www.avsforum.com. People
have asked Panasonic what the rated life span is for the current
generation 6UY (commercial version) and the consumer PD/PX25 versions
and Panasonic specifically states it as 60,000 hours to half brightness.
I don't see it in the specs on the website, but it may be the marketing
dept doesn't see the need to publicize it. Chances are few people will
ever keep these sets as their main TVs long enough to get anywhere close
to 60,000 hours given the falling prices and improving displays we will
see over the next few years.

Alan

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Leonard Caillouet wrote:
> The reason that I ask is that I have repeatedly asked tech reps at Panasonic
> this question and they say that they do not have any published life
> expectancy. They have said that their experience is that the numbers will
> be much lower than this, probably less than crts. Most of the numbers that
> I have seen actually in publication have been from Fujitsu and Zenith, or
> simply hearsay from forums.
>
> From what I can tell, these kinds of numbers are very, very optimistic. I
> would not expect 60,000 hours out of any CRT, much less a PDP (for 50%
> brightness level).
>
> Leonard

Leonard, go to the Panasonic website for the commercial models -
http://catalog2.panasonic.com/weba [...] upId=14624


- which you may notice now has a bunch of new 7UY models, click on one
of the models and then select brochure. You will get a PDF file for
either the 6UY or 7UY models. In the 7UY brochure, on the left hand
column of page 4 it states "panel structure boasts a long service life
of 60,000 hours". In the 6UY brochure, the same statement appears on the
right hand column in page 5. So there is an official source for this.
Given that 60,000 hours is 6.8 years, they are presumably basing this on
extrapolating much shorter duration tests, so yea, take the number with
a pinch of salt - a large pinch of salt.

BTW, I was just looking at the web pages on the 7Uys and they put the
60,000 hour number on there.

Alan

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

"Alan Figgatt" <afiggatt@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:X7Gdnf-YFJi62cvcRVn-rw@comcast.com...
> Leonard Caillouet wrote:
> > The reason that I ask is that I have repeatedly asked tech reps at
Panasonic
> > this question and they say that they do not have any published life
> > expectancy. They have said that their experience is that the numbers
will
> > be much lower than this, probably less than crts. Most of the numbers
that
> > I have seen actually in publication have been from Fujitsu and Zenith,
or
> > simply hearsay from forums.
> >
> > From what I can tell, these kinds of numbers are very, very optimistic.
I
> > would not expect 60,000 hours out of any CRT, much less a PDP (for 50%
> > brightness level).
> >
> > Leonard
>
> Leonard, go to the Panasonic website for the commercial models -
>
http://catalog2.panasonic.com/weba [...] upId=14624
>
>
> - which you may notice now has a bunch of new 7UY models, click on one
> of the models and then select brochure. You will get a PDF file for
> either the 6UY or 7UY models. In the 7UY brochure, on the left hand
> column of page 4 it states "panel structure boasts a long service life
> of 60,000 hours". In the 6UY brochure, the same statement appears on the
> right hand column in page 5. So there is an official source for this.
> Given that 60,000 hours is 6.8 years, they are presumably basing this on
> extrapolating much shorter duration tests, so yea, take the number with
> a pinch of salt - a large pinch of salt.
>
> BTW, I was just looking at the web pages on the 7Uys and they put the
> 60,000 hour number on there.
>
> Alan

This is great news. I'd love to get more detail on what they are doing to
enhance the phosphor life.

Leonard

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Alan Figgatt wrote:
> Leonard Caillouet wrote:
>
>> The reason that I ask is that I have repeatedly asked tech reps at
>> Panasonic
>> this question and they say that they do not have any published life
>> expectancy. They have said that their experience is that the numbers
>> will
>> be much lower than this, probably less than crts. Most of the numbers
>> that
>> I have seen actually in publication have been from Fujitsu and Zenith, or
>> simply hearsay from forums.
>>
>> From what I can tell, these kinds of numbers are very, very
>> optimistic. I
>> would not expect 60,000 hours out of any CRT, much less a PDP (for 50%
>> brightness level).
>>
>> Leonard
>
>
> Leonard, go to the Panasonic website for the commercial models -
> http://catalog2.panasonic.com/weba [...] upId=14624
>
>
> - which you may notice now has a bunch of new 7UY models, click on one
> of the models and then select brochure. You will get a PDF file for
> either the 6UY or 7UY models. In the 7UY brochure, on the left hand
> column of page 4 it states "panel structure boasts a long service life
> of 60,000 hours".

Which begs the question: What is "service life"? In my experience with
that term in computer products it means when the device is so dead that
a power cycle will not restart it, not that it has lost 3dB of some
characteristic.

Matthew

--
Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game
You can't win
You can't break even
You can't get out of the game

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:20:28 -0400, Alan Figgatt
<afiggatt@comcast.net> wrote:

>Leonard Caillouet wrote:
>> The reason that I ask is that I have repeatedly asked tech reps at Panasonic
>> this question and they say that they do not have any published life
>> expectancy. They have said that their experience is that the numbers will
>> be much lower than this, probably less than crts. Most of the numbers that
>> I have seen actually in publication have been from Fujitsu and Zenith, or
>> simply hearsay from forums.
>>
>> From what I can tell, these kinds of numbers are very, very optimistic. I
>> would not expect 60,000 hours out of any CRT, much less a PDP (for 50%
>> brightness level).
>>
>> Leonard
>
> Leonard, go to the Panasonic website for the commercial models -
>http://catalog2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ModelList?storeId=11201&catalogId=13051&catGroupId=14624
>
>
>- which you may notice now has a bunch of new 7UY models, click on one
>of the models and then select brochure. You will get a PDF file for
>either the 6UY or 7UY models. In the 7UY brochure, on the left hand
>column of page 4 it states "panel structure boasts a long service life
>of 60,000 hours". In the 6UY brochure, the same statement appears on the
>right hand column in page 5. So there is an official source for this.
>Given that 60,000 hours is 6.8 years, they are presumably basing this on
>extrapolating much shorter duration tests, so yea, take the number with
>a pinch of salt - a large pinch of salt.
>
> BTW, I was just looking at the web pages on the 7Uys and they put the
>60,000 hour number on there.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>

60,000 hrs is indeed only 6.8 years, but that is calculated at 24/7
use. In an environment of 8 hrs/day of TV use, it means 20.5 years of
use.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Matthew L. Martin wrote:
>
> Which begs the question: What is "service life"? In my experience with
> that term in computer products it means when the device is so dead that
> a power cycle will not restart it, not that it has lost 3dB of some
> characteristic.
>
> Matthew

In this case, it means "The time until panel brightness is reduced to
half its initial value". So, it is a 3 dB drop in max brightness. Since
most people run their plasmas set at < 50% of max brightness to begin
with, the real issue will likely be a loss of contrast as the screen
approaches its spec service life. But, realistically, what they are
saying is that either the power supply, the control & scalar
electronics, the high voltage components are probably going to fail
before the display screen does. Of course, these are fixable by swapping
in a new part, although if you get a plasma TV and one of these fails 6
years from now, by then you will likely be able to buy a new bigger
better flat screen TV using SED, OLED, LCD, Plasma, whatever, at a much
lower price than what you paid in 2004.

Alan

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Home Theatre > HDTV > A confused reader's question about Black
Go to:

There are 603 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them