Archived from groups: alt.games.nintendo.pokemon (
More info?)
In article <tIZWd.6919$JH1.370627@news20.bellglobal.com>,
daramark <dara.butler@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>"Astronomer Smith" <astronomersmith@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:112on17ot8mkv11@corp.supernews.com...
>> Just a stupid series of questions maybe, but, I am curious about something
>> and thought maybe some of you poke-masters could throw a little wisdom to
>> a beginner.
>>
>> I understand that waiting on evolving your pokemon allows them to learn
>> all their natural moves at an earlier level. So, what is the advantage in
>> evolving? When a pokemon evolves do their stats go up maybe?
Yes. They also can change types, and other features.
For
>> example, would a squirtle with all his moves learned, at Level 53, be as
>> good as a Blastoise with all his levels learned at 53 (or whatever level
>> he would learn his last move), I'm just hypothetical guessing for
>> comparison here?
The Squirtle would be weaker.
>> I guess what I'm asking is if it is better to cancel the evolution every
>> time, until all moves are learned, and then letting it evolve, or just let
>> it evolve when it tries? What are the pros and cons of either way?
>> Thanks.
>
>In the end, if you keep your Squirtle (mind you it's a bad example) a
>Squirtle until it learns it's moves earlier then evolve it and raise it, it
>will have about the same stats, depending on EVs from the pokes fought, as
>if you had let it evolve at the earliest points and then raised it.
>
Right. Either path has the same end result. If you want the evolved
form earlier, you can evolve and get moves later. If you want to
get the moves faster, you can get the moves and then evolve. No
big deal. (Right now, in Leaf Green, I'm trying to decide whether
to evolve a Rhyhorn now, or wait for it to learn Earthquake and then
evolve.)
In Sapphire, when I wanted a L50 Salamence for the Battle Tower,
I kept it as a Bagon until it learned Dragon Claw, then evolved
it, and it became a Salamence at level 50.
>Mind you Squirtle, and some of the other pokes, learns different moves than
>it's evolved forms. Sometimes this means that if you really want a move you
>might have to breed for it.
>
For example, in Ruby/Sapphire, if you evolve a Nincada as soon as you
can, it won't learn False Swipe. If you let it go up to L25 (IIRC),
it does learn False Swipe, and then you can let it evolve and get a
nice fast Ninjask with False Swipe (not to mention Shedinja...).
>I did this with Shroomish, raising both a male and a female up to level 54
>to learn Spore then breeding them to pass the move on to their offspring. I
>then raised the offspring, and let it evolve as soon as it wanted to because
>it's evolved form learns different moves. If you raise something that knows
>False Swipe and can breed with Shroomish, you breed for a male Shroomish
>that knows False Swipe, then up to level 54 for Spore, and then breed with a
>female Shroomish that knows Spore (level 54) to get a Breloom that knows
>Spore and False Swipe and you have a Pokemon catching machine.
>
You can only do that in Ruby. Get a male Zangoose, and raise it to L55
or so until it learns False Swipe. Breed it to a Seedot/Nuzleaf/Shiftry,
get a mail Seedot who knows False Swipe, breed it to a female Shroomish/
Breloom, raise a male offspring to know Spore, breed it to another
female Shroomish/Breloom who knows Spore.
It's a *lot* of work, but boy does it catch fish!
--
David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask.
david@thornley.net | If you don't, flee.
http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O-