Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

E4300 will not go above 9*270Mhz!!!!! AAARGH!!

Last response: in Overclocking
March 21, 2007 2:16:35 PM


Sorry I decided to start a new thread to keep everything in once place.

I am having real woes overclocking my E4300! Here is my setup

Gigabyte P965-DS3 rev 1 F10 + E4300
Tuniq Tower 120 + Artic 5
2gb Geil Ultra 800 4-4-4-12
Corsair HX520
PCI-E 6800 GT Xtreme 256
PCI Firewire card
PCI Usb card

OK now the problem:

2 weeks ago I only had the 1gig of RAM and I didnt have the firewire card. I got the system up to 2.7Ghz using the following setup:

Vcore 1.35V (+0.025V)
Memory set to 1:1
9*300Mhz = 2.7Ghz
EVERYTHING ELSE AUTO (and all things that need to be disabled are off)

Temperatures were fine, <50c full load with TAT.

Then I added the Firewire card and it booted fine. Stable for the following week or two

Yesterday I added another gig of RAM (to bring me to 2gig) and stupidly I didnt revert to stock settings before installing it. I booted, and the motherboard did its usual trick of reducing back down to 200Mhz*9. It wouldnt then boot above about 9*240.

I upped the VDRAM to +0.2V and manually set the timigs to 4-4-4-12. That got me to 270*9. However when I tried to go further I got the bleeps and had to clear the CMOS.

Next I tried following the guide, set the timigs to 4-4-4-12, the FSB to +0.1v and the MCH to +0.1v and the VDRAM to +0.3v (2.1v). I tried to boot at 9*270 but it refused and went back to stock.

Whats going on here? Are my timings too tight?


More about : e4300 270mhz aaargh

March 21, 2007 2:59:40 PM

Yes, I would suggest loosening your timings a little to see if that will get the system stable.

Another thought I had is maybe the RAM isn't matched close enough to work together. If they didn't come in a kit, even RAM of the same model number might have different type chips that make up the module. Difference subtle enough that could cause these problems maybe.

EDIT: Try this first. One other suggestion. Try removing the firewire card. Crazy I know, but it COULD be the culprit. Maybe the PCI frequency isn't locking like it's supposed to. I've experienced that on several motherboards.
March 21, 2007 3:20:42 PM

Also try the different pairs of RAM alone.

then take voltage up to 1.4 and see if you can get a better OC

Related resources
March 21, 2007 3:52:57 PM

Still no luck. I put the RAM setting back to AUTO (SPD was setting it to 5-5-5-18 which seems OK?)

I removed both PCI cards, still wont boot above 9*270mhz
I increased Vcore to 1.375, no difference
I increased Vcore to 1.4, no differemce
I tried setting the PCI-E freq to 100, no differemce (bleeps)
I tried upping the PCI-E by +0.1V, no difference

I didnt try each RAM pair separately, as ultimately I need to use them together and I'm not buying new stuff,

One thing I have noticed is that sometimes (e.g. when I put Vcore to 1.4, it turns on, and seems like it loads windows (hdd lights, etc) but nothing comes on the screen at all - not even the GFX bios stuff... weird... Hard reset results in the same thing, OFF then ON brings the screen up again but settings go back to 9*200Mhz

I dont know what else to try now. Perhaps my RAM is not very well matched and 2.430Ghz is a good as I'm going to get?!? Booo!!

March 21, 2007 4:30:23 PM

Solved. Fixed the PCI-E freq to 105 (from some other thread). Currently running stable @ 9*333 :)  and rising....

Knew it could do it :) 


March 21, 2007 4:47:10 PM

OK highest stable setting like this is 9*350=3.150Ghz with STOCK settings aside from

PCI-E freq = 105

When I go to 360 I get errors with TAT. What should I raise next to keep going? Also should I try reducing vdram and vcore first as I dont actually know whether I need them to be raised - perhaps my problem was the PCI exp freq all along.


March 22, 2007 2:28:54 AM

DANG -LOCK the PCI-E freq to 105??? Never heard of that one before. Was it suppose to be a fix for all motherboards or just yours?

I am stuck at 322 on an ASUS P5DWG2-WS-Pro and thought I was doing well since it is a 975x chipset. I am going to have to try that.