IBM doubles CPU cooling capabilities

1Tanker

Splendid
Apr 28, 2006
4,645
1
22,780
I wasn't sure if this had been posted before but I thought I would post it, tis a very good read :)

Interesting]http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070325-ibm-doubles-cpu-cooling-capabilities-with-simple-manufacturing-change.html
Interesting idea, but by adding "more" trenches(areas to be filled with thermal-paste), i would have thought the efficiency would go down....as they're relying more on the TIM. If you have a "groove", the groove IMO would fill with more thermal paste.... and the thicker it is, the less heat it would conduct away from the IHS. Does anyone else feel this way, or am i looking at it from the wrong perspective? :|
 

sweetpants

Distinguished
Jul 5, 2006
579
0
18,980
I wasn't sure if this had been posted before but I thought I would post it, tis a very good read :)

Interesting]http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070325-ibm-doubles-cpu-cooling-capabilities-with-simple-manufacturing-change.html
Interesting idea, but by adding "more" trenches(areas to be filled with thermal-paste), i would have thought the efficiency would go down....as they're relying more on the TIM. If you have a "groove", the groove IMO would fill with more thermal paste.... and the thicker it is, the less heat it would conduct away from the IHS. Does anyone else feel this way, or am i looking at it from the wrong perspective? :|

That's what I was looking at it... but I think what it's supposed to do is keep the the very small peices of metal from clumping together, instead of making the magical cross jobby.