Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > Which "Windows' better handles 4GB of mem?

Which "Windows' better handles 4GB of mem?

Forum Windows XP : Windows XP General Discussion - Which "Windows' better handles 4GB of mem?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I read in some forums that Windows XP can't handle 4GB of memory and uses, instead, only 3.3GB
Here are one link:
http://bink.nu/forums/8805/PrintPost.aspx
but if you do a search "windows XP 4GB ram limit" you will see tons of forums which discuss this issue.
The fact is, I just assembled my nes PC and I got 4GB of memory on Win XP.
Now, check this:
- the BIOS recognizes all 4 GB
- when I check the system properties, it shows 1.93GB of RAM (!?!?!)
- system information says I have 4096MB of total physical memory.
- task manager, under the "performance" tab shows 2030896K of total memory which is 1.936GB

What is going on?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Quote :

I read in some forums that Windows XP can't handle 4GB of memory and uses, instead, only 3.3GB
Here are one link:
http://bink.nu/forums/8805/PrintPost.aspx
but if you do a search "windows XP 4GB ram limit" you will see tons of forums which discuss this issue.
The fact is, I just assembled my nes PC and I got 4GB of memory on Win XP.
Now, check this:
- the BIOS recognizes all 4 GB
- when I check the system properties, it shows 1.93GB of RAM (!?!?!)
- system information says I have 4096MB of total physical memory.
- task manager, under the "performance" tab shows 2030896K of total memory which is 1.936GB

What is going on?



32 bits os and cpu can only use 2^32 bits (4 gigs) total adress space. since everything, from video card to usb devices use some adress spaces, then there is no more 4 gigs available for ram.

64 bits os and cpu will be able to use way more than 4 gigs of ram...(2^64)

Reply to pat

I'm not really convinced about that: all other systems I saw show the actuall total physical memory in the "Syestem Properties" tab, regardless of they use.
So why would it show only 1.93GB when there are 4GB avail?

Or are you saying that some of the 2^32 addresses are not available because reserved by some hardware?
Even so, 1.93 is << 4: can it be that 2.07GB are reserved? that's less than 2^31 ...

Reply to yankeeDDL
- 0 +

Quote :

I'm not really convinced about that: all other systems I saw show the actuall total physical memory in the "Syestem Properties" tab, regardless of they use.
So why would it show only 1.93GB when there are 4GB avail?



I dont know..maybe there is something wrong with th OS memory management or you are using some sort of virtual devices that chop some memroy.

Quote :


Or are you saying that some of the 2^32 addresses are not available because reserved by some hardware?
Even so, 1.93 is << 4: can it be that 2.07GB are reserved? that's less than 2^31 ...




thats it. 4gigs is the max allowed with 32 bits. running 2 512megs videocard in SLI use 1 gigs of adress space that cannot be use by ram, ie.

Reply to pat
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > Which "Windows' better handles 4GB of mem?
Go to:

There are 1344 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them