after reading through the article i am thoroughly amazed at how well he x2 architecture holds up against core2duo, with the exception of overclocking of course. But for most mainstream users who are not into overclocking it looks like AMD still offers a better deal over current hardware
This shows great signs of AMD beating intel significantly with its new architecture
you are on drugs right?
the x2 arch does not hold up against c2d. it gets destroyed without overclocking.
most mainstream users dont give a crap if its amd or intel only what the price is and what the features are. the old pentiums D's are what amd is competing with not the c2D.
2 things i am pissed off by are why did amd do the socket change after making us all think we could upgrade and second why are the prices so low now?
i gave up on them and got a E6600 and it rocks
Did you read the article clearly?
Obviously not, since from the E4300/X2 4400+ up Intel and AMD are within 5% of each other price/performance wise. This is close enough to a toss up (Baron's gonna love this
) that the consumer wins either way since there is no 'bad choice' (just avoid the goddamn PDs of course!).
Things like mobo price (AM2 has the advantage), RAM requirements (Intel has the advantage as high speed DDR2 is not necessary for good performance), power consumption (Intel has an advantage at load, AMD is a bit better at idle) and of course 'overclockability' (Intel clearly ahead on this one) will be the main deciding factors for most people.