Hey guys, much appreciated if anyone has an answer to this
My brother took home an old Dell Optiplex 170L from his work as a stopgap until he builds a proper HTPC for his bedroom. The problem is that were trying to connect the integrated graphics VGA output to a 40" 1080P Samsung
We bought a cheapo VGA->DVI connector to a HDMI/DVI cable to the VGA but the monitor doesnt like at all. No picture. Thankfuly the Samsung F71 actually has a VGA input - but connecting it with a VGA->VGA cable is leaving us with limited options in resolutions - either 800x600 or 1024x768 or 1280x1024 (all 4:3) are the only ones that work. 1366(?)x768 is there but the Samsung wont display it.
Now, i know the tv loves HDMI/DVI inputs and is capable of almost any resolution, including 1366x768 because I've had my computer hooked up to it.
Is our poor choice of resolutions caused by the VGA cable input on the Samsung or the 82865G integrated graphics chip?
My brother took home an old Dell Optiplex 170L from his work as a stopgap until he builds a proper HTPC for his bedroom. The problem is that were trying to connect the integrated graphics VGA output to a 40" 1080P Samsung
We bought a cheapo VGA->DVI connector to a HDMI/DVI cable to the VGA but the monitor doesnt like at all. No picture. Thankfuly the Samsung F71 actually has a VGA input - but connecting it with a VGA->VGA cable is leaving us with limited options in resolutions - either 800x600 or 1024x768 or 1280x1024 (all 4:3) are the only ones that work. 1366(?)x768 is there but the Samsung wont display it.
Now, i know the tv loves HDMI/DVI inputs and is capable of almost any resolution, including 1366x768 because I've had my computer hooked up to it.
Is our poor choice of resolutions caused by the VGA cable input on the Samsung or the 82865G integrated graphics chip?