once again amd bias - why? this seems fair?
well its not! This article is designed to make amd look good!
This article only makes amd chips look better then they really are. A 2.4ghz amd chip is near the top - the all mighty fx-60 is only 2.6 ghz and barely clock to 3ghz. While a C2D at 2.93ghz easly clocks over 3.8ghz or a P4 2.4c clocks to 4.1ghz THG did that test (4.1ghz) what 3 years ago?
amd chips barely can get over 3ghz. Well p4's clock easily at 4.1-4.25ghz. The article even says clock speed is not a true measure - all this proves is that THG loves to make amd look good if they can!
THG thinking: "lets compare amd's almost fastest chips to intels mid stuff - that make make amd look good"
4 years ago you could buy a a p4 to hit 4ghz even today no amd chip can hit 4ghz. we all know core 2 duo can be pushed to around 4ghz.
testing a p4 at 2.4ghz to amd at 2.4ghz to c2d is a poor test of true potential of each chip.
THG: "AMD has tried to educate people not to judge a processor based on its clock speed ever since the introduction of the Athlon XP"
how about apples to apples, this is not. This is a comparison of amd's near fastest to intels mid to low end! if you had overclocked the chips too it would have been a better and more informative article.
well its not! This article is designed to make amd look good!
This article only makes amd chips look better then they really are. A 2.4ghz amd chip is near the top - the all mighty fx-60 is only 2.6 ghz and barely clock to 3ghz. While a C2D at 2.93ghz easly clocks over 3.8ghz or a P4 2.4c clocks to 4.1ghz THG did that test (4.1ghz) what 3 years ago?
amd chips barely can get over 3ghz. Well p4's clock easily at 4.1-4.25ghz. The article even says clock speed is not a true measure - all this proves is that THG loves to make amd look good if they can!
THG thinking: "lets compare amd's almost fastest chips to intels mid stuff - that make make amd look good"
4 years ago you could buy a a p4 to hit 4ghz even today no amd chip can hit 4ghz. we all know core 2 duo can be pushed to around 4ghz.
testing a p4 at 2.4ghz to amd at 2.4ghz to c2d is a poor test of true potential of each chip.
THG: "AMD has tried to educate people not to judge a processor based on its clock speed ever since the introduction of the Athlon XP"
how about apples to apples, this is not. This is a comparison of amd's near fastest to intels mid to low end! if you had overclocked the chips too it would have been a better and more informative article.