Show me about those ridiculously low prices? and don't come now with the next price drop on april. Its not pointless to make something available that extends the life out of your machine. Penryn can be made to use existing boards and FSB and not have ANY negative impact on the performance.
We are mainly a performance site and enthusiast. Most IT Managers are not obsessing about every single new processor that is coming out. And if you find one that is constantly upgrading to the latest and foremost technology w/o needing it, then HE or YOU will be the one flipping burgers in FUDROCKERS
It's pretty well agreed that Vista requires 2GB to not be a slug. Therefore, do you think it is "normal" that you can configure a brand new system with a very capable dual core sitting on a reasonably competent motherboard where the RAM costs more than the CPU and motherboard put together? Today's CPUs are being sold at firesale subcost pricing due to the disastrous price wars that are taking chunks out of the market value of the entire duopoly. It may be good for the consumer in the short run but the long term effects are completely unpredictable and could turn out to be short term gain for long term pain.
As for IT managers, I was clearly referring to OCing. I strongly doubt that any corporate IT guys are OCing the data entry clerk's PCs. If you want to debate that fact, go for it.
And BTW, Fudruckers is my favorite Fast Fud Restaurant. 8)
I saw your avatar, hence why i said it.
Anyways... IT managers never care for data entry people... If their computers are slow, let them deal with it. Besides with the applications that a data entry runs, there is no need for overclocking, just a fast ethernet connection and a fast server to process the data.
Overclocking is exactly like modifying a car. You wouldn't modify your every day company car. Period.
The point I am trying to get accross is: Look at all the signatures in this forums and look at all the reviews on every single magazine. most of them deal with overclocking. Most of the ones that shell the most amount of money are the enthusiasts and spanking on the enthusiasts really hurts business also. What if everyone started to write. I prefer AMD because it has the longest run of upgrades you can get. ALl of them... Wouldn't that hurt intel? AMD making the chips overclockable enough and providing future upgrades as they have had.
Have you seen lately that intel is advertising in Formula 1 and other places? Advertisement is the most important aspect to a business in most cases. One angry customer represents 25 potential NON buyers.
Vista is a pig. Less than 2gb and you are totally crawling, but its a good OS and it makes well use of every single mhz you put into it. But I think there has been some issues with drivers and maybe its because they have failed to release all technical documents needed for the development of such. Such is the case for intel and its motherboard requirements for processor upgrades.
If they release a roadmap of the sockets and future possible technical specs or specifications needed and standards I guess its possible to have a longer run of hardware. There is always the need for new cheap motherboards. Why not give something back to the enthusiast (the one that overclocks to hell) that is the one plaguing this forum and recommending INTEL and making intel what it is today?
Why do you think that they are upping the bandwidth?? /because it is bottlenecked. Please.... It hasn't been bottlenecked since it was 533MHz. We just need faster memory with better execution time to make the most out of the bandwidth (DDR3 for RAM). They are doing it to stop the amount of overcloking being done to a chip and now they have finally released an unlocked multiplier in the X series. Aren't they forcing you to shell out the money for the same level of overclock?