Well IE7 has a couple of handy features, except for me it seems very unreliable
www.sportinglife.com/racing/liveshows, www.ladbrokes.co.uk and various other sports websites which my dad uses worked great under IE6 with maybe the odd crash if we really pushed our luck. These website display sports odds so they are automatically refreshed as part of the script. It seemed under IE7, so much as Alt Tabbing would cause meltdown under all these sites. Even just going for a coffee and leaving it un attended would cause a problem. I had crashes every minute with IE7, and it even started on my usual websites.
That was the final straw - One system restore later and I am now back with IE6. I miss the tabbed browsing a little (Windows Live toolbar gives me that feature in the meantime) and the ability to view websites in thumbnails was a nice idea, and my dad did like the zoom ability without having to use large fonts and distort the formatting of the website. But if you cant use these features for more than 60 seconds without a crash then its REALLY not worth it. After all, back when I had Windows 95, I was so tempted to move over to 98 to get USB support and the lovely new desktop themes and screensavers, just so I could have some new eye candy and also be the big showoff showing peeps my PC and them going "ooooh you got Windows 98". But after I discovered that the BSOD rate would quadrouple and after Mr Gates public embarassment with USB under 98, it really wasn't worth it!!
As for other browsers - I don't wish to complicate things and overburden my PC with more than one browser. It's bad enough having 4 or so media players all doing the same tasks and competing for which one is going to be default. IE has always been the defacto browser for every webpage so I will stick to IE.
Now, is there anything wrong in my thinking? or have I been given the duff version of IE 7??